PURPOSE: Delayed surgical management of acetabular fractures, often necessary due to life-threatening concomitant injuries, is a great challenge because delays may potentially increase complications and decrease outcomes. We report clinical outcomes of 61 acetabular fractures treated by delayed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with an injury-to-surgery interval (ISI) of 22-399 days. METHODS: Operations were performed between April 2001 and December 2008. There were 61 cases (42 men 19 women), with an average age of 38 years. All patients were followed for an average of 82 months. Demographic data, fracture pattern, ISI, concomitant injuries, surgical approach, complications and clinical outcomes were recorded and analysed. There were 16 simple fractures (26.2%) and 45 associated fractures (73.8%). Matta criteria were used to evaluate reduction quality. The Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scoring system was employed to assess post-operative functionality. RESULTS: Anatomical reduction was achieved in 45 cases (73.8%). The clinical result was excellent in 38 cases, good in 13, fair in six and poor in four. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was observed in three cases, and heterotopic ossification was found in 28 cases. Four patients had transient palsy of the sciatic nerve. CONCLUSIONS: ORIF for fresh acetabular fractures might yield a better prognosis; however, for delayed acetabular fractures, clinical outcomes are also predictable when sophisticated surgical techniques are employed. Our results indicate that delayed ORIF could yield satisfactory clinical outcomes in the majority of patients with acetabular fractures.
PURPOSE: Delayed surgical management of acetabular fractures, often necessary due to life-threatening concomitant injuries, is a great challenge because delays may potentially increase complications and decrease outcomes. We report clinical outcomes of 61 acetabular fractures treated by delayed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with an injury-to-surgery interval (ISI) of 22-399 days. METHODS: Operations were performed between April 2001 and December 2008. There were 61 cases (42 men 19 women), with an average age of 38 years. All patients were followed for an average of 82 months. Demographic data, fracture pattern, ISI, concomitant injuries, surgical approach, complications and clinical outcomes were recorded and analysed. There were 16 simple fractures (26.2%) and 45 associated fractures (73.8%). Matta criteria were used to evaluate reduction quality. The Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scoring system was employed to assess post-operative functionality. RESULTS: Anatomical reduction was achieved in 45 cases (73.8%). The clinical result was excellent in 38 cases, good in 13, fair in six and poor in four. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was observed in three cases, and heterotopic ossification was found in 28 cases. Four patients had transient palsy of the sciatic nerve. CONCLUSIONS: ORIF for fresh acetabular fractures might yield a better prognosis; however, for delayed acetabular fractures, clinical outcomes are also predictable when sophisticated surgical techniques are employed. Our results indicate that delayed ORIF could yield satisfactory clinical outcomes in the majority of patients with acetabular fractures.
Authors: André Busch; Ulrich Stöckle; Anna Schreiner; Peter de Zwaart; Aljoscha Schäffler; Björn Gunnar Ochs Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 3.067