Literature DB >> 22269123

Minimum ten-year follow-up of acetabular fracture fixation from the Irish tertiary referral centre.

Paul Magill1, James McGarry, Joseph M Queally, Seamus F Morris, John P McElwain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Successful outcome from acetabular fracture fixation is multi-factorial. Long-term results are not frequently reported. Pooling such data from high output centres will help progress acetabular fixation. This paper presents the first ten-year data from the Irish tertiary referral centre. AIM: To audit the radiographic and clinical outcome of all patients who had acetabular fracture fixation in the unit a minimum of ten years previously.
METHODS: Patients were identified from the unit database. Each patient was contacted and invited to attend the hospital for clinical and radiographic review. Clinical review consisted of examination and three separate scoring systems using both subjective and objective parameters. Radiographic review consisted of a standard AP pelvis and Judet views.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients were identified. Follow up of 68% was achieved. Total hip arthroplasty rate was 13.8%. Twenty percent of the remaining native hips had radiographic evidence of established arthritis. Sixty-three percent of functional outcome scores were classified as 'good' or 'excellent'. Radiographic and functional data did not strongly correlate. The strongest correlating factor with poor functional outcome was concurrent injuries, particularly sciatic nerve injury.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the role of operative intervention for acetabular fractures in a tertiary referral centre and allow better counselling of patients on prognosis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22269123     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  7 in total

1.  Late surgery for acetabular fractures in a Chinese level I trauma centre: surgical experience and outcomes.

Authors:  You-Shui Gao; Zu-Bin Zhou; Ming-Jie Tang; Xiao-Wei Yu; Song Chen; Chang-Qing Zhang; Yu-Qiang Sun
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  WHOQOL-BREF Hindi questionnaire: Quality of life assessment in acetabular fracture patients.

Authors:  Umesh K Meena; Ramesh K Sen; Prateek Behera; Sujit K Tripathy; Sameer Aggrawal; Sreekanth R Rajoli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  A reduction clamp for an aiming component in associated acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Zhang-Fu Wang; Zheng-Hua Hong; Mei-Zhen Wang; Jian-Wei Ruan; Wei Wang; Wei-Bo Pan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Radiographic analysis of the restoration of hip joint center following open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hong-fei Shi; Jin Xiong; Yi-xin Chen; Jun-Fei Wang; Yin-he Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Operative management of acetabular fracture: A 10-year experience in Isfahan, Iran.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Etemadifar; Amin Nemati; Mojde Chinigarzade
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-10-26

6.  Outcome of surgical treatment for displaced acetabular fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sahu Ramji Lal
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-12-29

7.  The value of 3D reconstructions in determining post-operative reduction in acetabular fractures: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elke Arts; Han Nijsink; Luc Verhamme; Jan Biert; Mike Bemelman; Lars Brouwers; Bas van Wageningen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.693

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.