Literature DB >> 2624283

Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons. Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects.

C L Highgenboten1, A Jackson, N B Meske.   

Abstract

Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been presented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility of the anterior and posterior knee laxity values for each and made direct comparisons of the results obtained. Thirty asymptomatic subjects were given a test-retest protocol on both legs with all three devices. Devices were tested in a counterbalanced order. Repeatability of test values within devices was variable, but all were acceptable, the lowest being r = 0.74. Analysis of variance (AN-OVA), and correlational analysis revealed that device-specific anterior and posterior laxity values were produced. We concluded that each commercially available knee laxity testing device can provide reproducible quantitative measurements of knee laxity; however, due to differences in device sensitivities and functional design, numerical results from one device cannot be generalized to another device.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2624283     DOI: 10.1177/036354658901700602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  17 in total

1.  Influences of Clinician Technique on Performance and Interpretation of the Lachman Test.

Authors:  Wendy L. Hurley; D Thompson McGuire
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Objective evaluation of anterior knee laxity; comparison of the KT-1000 and GNRB® arthrometers.

Authors:  Michel Collette; Julie Courville; Marc Forton; Bertrand Gagnière
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Development of a simple device for measurement of rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Kevin M Bell; Andrew G Tsai; Ryan S Costic; Robert Allaire; Thore Zantop; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The effect of thigh muscle activity on anterior knee laxity in the uninjured and anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee.

Authors:  Massimo G Barcellona; Matthew C Morrissey; Peter Milligan; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The measurement of anterior cruciate ligament strain in vivo.

Authors:  B Beynnon; J G Howe; M H Pope; R J Johnson; B C Fleming
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Bioabsorbable sutures versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Vladimir Senekovic; Matej Balazic
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-09

Review 7.  Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Romain Seil
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 8.  Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging.

Authors:  Eric M Rohman; Jeffrey A Macalena
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

9.  Knee-laxity measurements examined by a left-hand- and a right-hand-dominant physiotherapist, in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and healthy controls.

Authors:  Ninni Sernert; Janett Helmers; Catarina Kartus; Lars Ejerhed; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Assessment of anterior cruciate laxity using the Genucom System.

Authors:  H N Andersen; P A Frandsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.