Literature DB >> 2624128

The validity of the General Health Questionnaire in a sample of accidentally injured adults.

U F Malt1.   

Abstract

The 20-item version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was given to 110 accidentally injured adults during the hospital stay. The patients were asked to rate their mental state prior to the accident. They also filled in the GHQ twice during a follow-up period of 28 months. All patients were twice examined by a psychiatrist who was blind to the patients' GHQ response. The overall values for sensitivity and specificity were good during the follow-up period and only slightly better using Chronic scoring procedure (80%-80%). The optimal cutting point for case screening varied across the different time-periods (2/3 pre-accident, 3/4 follow-up). Patients with permanently higher case-scores at follow-up than at pre-accident were among those severely affected by the injuries from a psychosocial point of view. The nine subjects who scored as a case at each of the three points of time all qualified for a DSM-III diagnosis. Sixty-three percent of the patients with a case score on two occasions qualified for a DSM-III diagnosis. The study indicates that GHQ-20 would be a useful measure of the psychosocial state of trauma patients seen in the course of rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2624128     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb05260.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1591


  21 in total

1.  30-item General Health Questionnaire in general hospitals: selecting items using a stepwise hierarchical procedure.

Authors:  J Wancata; R Alexandrowicz; N Benda
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Using Rasch-models to compare the 30-, 20-, and 12-items version of the general health questionnaire taking four recoding schemes into account.

Authors:  Rainer W Alexandrowicz; Fabian Friedrich; Rebecca Jahn; Nathalie Soulier
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr       Date:  2015-10-28

3.  The criterion validity of different versions of the General Health Questionnaire among non-psychiatric inpatients.

Authors:  Fabian Friedrich; Rainer Alexandrowicz; Norbert Benda; Gero Cerny; Johannes Wancata
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Psychological distress and user experiences with health care provision in persons living with spinal cord injury for more than 20 years.

Authors:  V M Jakimovska; E Kostovski; F Biering-Sørensen; I B Lidal
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Stressful life events and cognitive decline: Sex differences in the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Cynthia A Munro; Alexandra M Wennberg; Nicholas Bienko; William W Eaton; Constantine G Lyketsos; Adam P Spira
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.485

6.  Effect of exercise on mobility, balance, and health-related quality of life in osteoporotic women with a history of vertebral fracture: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  A Bergland; H Thorsen; R Kåresen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Translation, data quality, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Norwegian version of the Effective Musculoskeletal Consumer Scale (EC-17).

Authors:  Bente Hamnes; Andrew Garratt; Ingvild Kjeken; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Kåre B Hagen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  A critical review of dimension-specific measures of health-related quality of life in cross-cultural research.

Authors:  M J Naughton; I Wiklund
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The long-term psychological effect of fatal accidents at sea on survivors: a cross-sectional study of North-Atlantic seamen.

Authors:  E Líndal; J G Stefánsson
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Emotion regulation in patients with rheumatic diseases: validity and responsiveness of the Emotional Approach Coping Scale (EAC).

Authors:  Heidi A Zangi; Andrew Garratt; Kåre Birger Hagen; Annette L Stanton; Petter Mowinckel; Arnstein Finset
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.