| Literature DB >> 26240644 |
Shogo Sasaki1, Hideyuki Koga2, Tron Krosshaug3, Satoshi Kaneko4, Toru Fukubayashi5.
Abstract
The strengths of interpersonal dyads formed by the attacker and defender in one-on-one situations are crucial for performance in team ball sports such as soccer. The purpose of this study was to analyze the kinematics of one-on-one defensive movements in soccer competitions, and determine the relationships between lower limb kinematics and the center of mass translation during cutting actions. Six defensive scenes in which a player was responding to an offender's dribble attack were selected for analysis. To reconstruct the three-dimensional kinematics of the players, we used a photogrammetric model-based image-matching technique. The hip and knee kinematics were calculated from the matched skeleton model. In addition, the center of mass height was expressed as a ratio of each participant's body height. The relationships between the center of mass height and the kinematics were determined by the Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient. The normalized center of mass height at initial contact was correlated with the vertical center of mass displacement (r = 0.832, p = 0.040) and hip flexion angle at initial contact (r = -0.823, p = 0.044). This suggests that the lower center of mass at initial contact is an important factor to reduce the downwards vertical center of mass translation during defensive cutting actions, and that this is executed primarily through hip flexion. It is therefore recommended that players land with an adequately flexed hip at initial contact during one-on-one cutting actions to minimize the vertical center of mass excursion.Entities:
Keywords: Video analysis; center of mass; defender; kinematics; performance
Year: 2015 PMID: 26240644 PMCID: PMC4519200 DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1A frame of the matched for case 4 – a female defensive cutting action at the time point of the lowest center of mass height.
Figure 2Frame sequences of the six defensive movements at the time point of initial foot contact, the time point of the lowest center of mass height (COMlow), and the point of foot off.
Motion characteristics of defensive cutting actions during football competitions.
| Total (n=6) | Male (n=3) | Female (n=3) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normalized COM height (cm/cm) | IC | 0.42 (0.03) | 0.39 (0.03) | 0.44 (0.02) |
| COMlow | 0.39 (0.02) | 0.38 (0.03) | 0.39 (0.01) | |
| FO | 0.42 (0.03) | 0.42 (0.03) | 0.43 (0.03) | |
| Hip flexion angle (deg) | IC | 32 (19) | 44 (14) | 19 (15) |
| COMlow | 45 (21) | 44 (28) | 45 (18) | |
| FO | 2 (16) | 0 (9) | 4 (23) | |
| Knee flexion angle (deg) | IC | 51 (10) | 59 (7) | 44 (6) |
| COMlow | 57 (12) | 57 (18) | 57 (7) | |
| FO | 24 (8) | 25 (10) | 23 (8) | |
| COM height displacement (cm) | IC to COMlow | 4.9 (2.5) | 2.9 (1.6) | 6.9 (1.0) |
| COMlow to FO | 6.5 (2.7) | 7.2 (2.3) | 5.9 (3.4) | |
| Hip angular displacement (deg) | IC to COMlow | 13 (21) | −1 (15) | 26 (19) |
| COMlow to FO | 42 (18) | 44 (22) | 41 (18) | |
| Knee angular displacement (deg) | IC to COMlow | 6 (12) | −2 (13) | 13 (6) |
| COMlow to FO | 33 (18) | 33 (25) | 34 (12) |
IC = the time point of initial foot contact, COMlow = the time point of the lowest center of mass height, FO = the point of foot off
Correlation coefficients between the normalized center of mass (COM) height and the hip and knee flexion angles during cutting actions in football defensive situations
| Normalized COM height | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC | COM low | FO | ||
| Hip flexion angle | IC | −0.823 | −0.676 | −0.275 |
| COMlow | −0.027 | −0.169 | 0.347 | |
| FO | −0.299 | −0.346 | 0.086 | |
| Knee flexion angle | IC | −0.405 | −0.155 | 0.255 |
| COMlow | 0.078 | −0.114 | 0.214 | |
| FO | −0.523 | −0.455 | −0.278 | |
p < 0.05
C = the time point of initial foot contact, COMlow = the time point of the lowest center of mass height, FO = the point of foot off
Correlation coefficients between the center of mass (COM) height displacement and the normalized COM height, and the hip and knee flexion angular displacement during cutting actions in football defensive situations.
| COM height displacement | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| IC to COMlow | COMlow to FO | ||
| Normalized COM height | IC | 0.832 | −0.233 |
| COMlow | 0.533 | −0.183 | |
| FO | 0.364 | 0.438 | |
| Hip angular displacement | IC to COMlow | 0.870 | 0.387 |
| COMlow to FO | 0.385 | 0.501 | |
| Knee angular displacement | IC to COMlow | 0.829 | 0.096 |
| COMlow to FO | 0.504 | 0.433 | |
p < 0.05
Note: IC = the time point of initial foot contact, COMlow = the time point of the lowest center of mass height, FO = the point of foot off
Figure 3Correlation between the normalized center of mass height at IC and the hip flexion angle at IC (left panel), and correlation between the center of mass height displacement between IC and COMlow and the normalized center of mass height at IC (right panel).
IC = the time point of initial foot contact, COMlow = the time point of the lowest center of mass height