Literature DB >> 26240531

In Situ Teaching: Fusing Labs & Lectures in Undergraduate Science Courses to Enhance Immersion in Scientific Research.

Jennifer Round1, Barbara Lom2.   

Abstract

Undergraduate courses in the life sciences at most colleges and universities are traditionally composed of two or three weekly sessions in a classroom supplemented with a weekly three-hour session in a laboratory. We have found that many undergraduates can have difficulty making connections and/or transferring knowledge between lab activities and lecture material. Consequently, we are actively developing ways to decrease the physical and intellectual divides between lecture and lab to help students make more direct links between what they learn in the classroom and what they learn in the lab. In this article we discuss our experiences teaching fused laboratory biology courses that intentionally blurred the distinctions between lab and lecture to provide undergraduates with immersive experiences in science that promote discovery and understanding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fused courses; laboratory; pedagogy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26240531      PMCID: PMC4521739     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ        ISSN: 1544-2896


  17 in total

1.  Inquiry-based undergraduate teaching in the life sciences at large research universities: a perspective on the Boyer Commission Report.

Authors:  William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2003

2.  Education. Scientific teaching.

Authors:  Jo Handelsman; Diane Ebert-May; Robert Beichner; Peter Bruns; Amy Chang; Robert DeHaan; Jim Gentile; Sarah Lauffer; James Stewart; Shirley M Tilghman; William B Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Teaching more by lecturing less.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

4.  The pipeline. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences.

Authors:  Susan H Russell; Mary P Hancock; James McCullough
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them.

Authors:  William B Wood
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.827

6.  Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science.

Authors:  Gabriela C Weaver; Cianán B Russell; Donald J Wink
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 7.  Education. Undergraduate research experiences: impacts and opportunities.

Authors:  Marcia C Linn; Erin Palmer; Anne Baranger; Elizabeth Gerard; Elisa Stone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning.

Authors:  David Lopatto
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Integrating teaching and research in undergraduate biology laboratory education.

Authors:  Matthew J Kloser; Sara E Brownell; Nona R Chiariello; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: lack of training, time, incentives, and...tensions with professional identity?

Authors:  Sara E Brownell; Kimberly D Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  1 in total

1.  DNA nanotechnology in the undergraduate laboratory: Analysis of molecular topology using DNA nanoswitches.

Authors:  Jibin Abraham Punnoose; Ken Halvorsen; Arun Richard Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Chem Educ       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.979

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.