A W A M de Cock1, A M Lodhi2, T L Rintoul3, K Bala3, G P Robideau3, Z Gloria Abad4, M D Coffey5, S Shahzad6, C A Lévesque3. 1. CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Plant Pathology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Pakistan. 3. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada; 4. USDA-APHIS-PPQ-Center of Plant Health Science and Technology, Bldg 580, BARC-e, Powder Mill Road, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. 5. Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. 6. Department of Agriculture, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abstract
The genus Phytopythium (Peronosporales) has been described, but a complete circumscription has not yet been presented. In the present paper we provide molecular-based evidence that members of Pythium clade K as described by Lévesque & de Cock (2004) belong to Phytopythium. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (LSU and SSU) and mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) as well as statistical analyses of pairwise distances strongly support the status of Phytopythium as a separate phylogenetic entity. Phytopythium is morphologically intermediate between the genera Phytophthora and Pythium. It is unique in having papillate, internally proliferating sporangia and cylindrical or lobate antheridia. The formal transfer of clade K species to Phytopythium and a comparison with morphologically similar species of the genera Pythium and Phytophthora is presented. A new species is described, Phytopythium mirpurense.
The genus Phytopythium (Peronosporales) has been described, but a complete circumscription has not yet been presented. In the present paper we provide molecular-based evidence that members of Pythium clade K as described by Lévesque & de Cock (2004) belong to Phytopythium. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (LSU and SSU) and mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) as well as statistical analyses of pairwise distances strongly support the status of Phytopythium as a separate phylogenetic entity. Phytopythium is morphologically intermediate between the genera Phytophthora and Pythium. It is unique in having papillate, internally proliferating sporangia and cylindrical or lobate antheridia. The formal transfer of clade K species to Phytopythium and a comparison with morphologically similar species of the genera Pythium and Phytophthora is presented. A new species is described, Phytopythium mirpurense.
The genus Pythium as defined by Pringsheim in 1858 was divided by Lévesque & de Cock (2004) into 11 clades based on molecular systematic analyses. These clades are generally well supported by morphological features. In particular, Pythium species belonging to clade K were observed to be phylogenetically distinct from the rest of the Pythium spp. and showed combined features of both Pythium and Phytophthora. The unique phylogenetic placement of species belonging to clade K has been recognised since the beginning of sequence-based phylogenetics. Briard et al. (1995) and Cooke et al. (2000) showed that Pythium vexans was clearly different from other Pythium spp. and Phytophthora using the ribosomal large subunit (LSU) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS), respectively. In a multigene study, Villa et al. (2006) showed that Pythium species belonging to clade K were closely related to Phytophthora. The uniqueness of this clade was also supported by Bedard et al. (2006) by analysis of the organisation of the 5S gene family. In species in clade K, the 5S rRNA genes were predominantly linked to the rDNA repeat mostly in tandem arrays in the same orientation as the rRNA genes.Phytopythium is a new genus in the family Pythiaceae, order Peronosporales that was described with Phytopythium sindhum as the type species by Bala et al. (2010b). They showed that Phytopythium sindhum is a member of clade K. Uzuhashi et al. (2010) divided Pythium into five new genera and assigned the name Ovatisporangium to the members of clade K, this name, however, is a later synonym of Phytopythium. Phytopythium therefore has priority. The objective of the present study is to establish which species belong to clade K and to make new taxonomic combinations for these species. To achieve this goal, phylogenies based on nuclear LSU rRNA (28S), SSU rRNA (18S) and mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase1 (COI) as well as statistical analyses of the pairwise distances from these datasets were prepared with an extensive coverage of the oomycetes containing almost all Pythium and Phytophthora species available in culture. The ITS gene region was also used to ascertain the position of all possible species in clade K but not for phylogeny since it is too variable to align sequences between Pythium and Phytophthora. Diagnostic morphological features of the group are also presented and discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Morphological studies
The strains used for the phylogenetic study were morphologically examined to verify their identity and to find the characteristic features of the group. The methods used for cultivation of the strains for study of morphology and zoospore development are the same as described by de Cock & Lévesque (2004).
DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing
Almost 300 strains of Pythium, Phytopythium, Phytophthora, Halophytophthora and Albugo were used in this study (Table 1). DNA was extracted using the protocols as described in Bala et al. (2010a). PCR amplifications for the rDNA LSU and ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 regions and mitochondrial DNA COI were done using the protocols and primer sequences as provided in Robideau et al. (2011). The SSU region was amplified using forward primer NS1 (5’-TAGTCATATGCTTGTCTC-3’) (White et al. 1990) and reverse primer OomLo5.8S47B (3’-CGCATTACGTATCGCAGTTCGCAG-5’) (Mazzola et al. 2002), with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 55 °C for 45 s, elongation at 72 °C for 2 min and final elongation at 72 °C for 8 min. Sequencing primers used for the SSU region were NS1, NS2 (5’-GGCTGCTGGCACCAGACTTGC3’), NS3 (5’-GCAAGTCTGGTGCCAGCAGCC), NS4 (5’-CTTCCGTCAATTCCTTTAAG3’), NS5 (5’-AACTTAAAGGAATTGACGGAAG3’) and NS8 (5’-TCCGCAGGTTCACCTACGGA3’) (White et al. 1990) as well as Oom_Lo5.8S47 (5’-ATTACGTATCGCAGTTCGCAG3’) (Man in ’t Veld et al. 2002) for full bidirectional coverage. Sequencing reactions were prepared using the Big Dye Terminator (BDT) v. 2 protocols (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Sequencing of the PCR product was performed in an Applied Biosystems Prism Genetic Analyzer model 3130XL.
Table 1
Species and isolates included in the study, showing GenBank accession numbers for each gene.
GenBank Accessions
Species
Strain Number
Clade
SSU_ITS_28S
SSU_ITS
SSU
COI
LSU
ITS
Albugo candida
AC2V
–
–
–
HQ708184
HQ665049
–
AC7A
–
–
HQ643110
HQ708183
HQ665050
–
ACCS
–
–
KF853245
–
–
–
Halophytophthora avicenniae
CBS188.85
Halophytophthora
–
–
–
HQ708219
HQ665146
–
Halophytophthora operculata
CBS241.83
Phytopythium
–
–
GU994173
KF853238
KJ128038
KJ128038
Halophytophthora polymorphica
CBS680.84
Halophytophthora
–
–
–
–
HQ665288
–
Phytophthora alni
P10564
Clade 7
–
–
JN635200
–
–
–
Phytophthora alticola
P16053
Clade 4
–
–
JN635264
–
–
–
Phytophthora andina
P13660
Clade 1
–
–
JN635253
–
–
–
Phytophthora arecae
CBS305.62
Clade 4
–
–
–
HQ708218
HQ665200
–
Phytophthora austrocedrae
P16040
Clade 8
–
–
JN635271
–
–
–
Phytophthora batemanensis
CBS679.84
Halophytophthora
–
–
–
HQ708220
HQ665286
–
Phytophthora bisheria
P10117
Clade 2
–
–
–
–
EU080746
–
P11311
Clade 2
–
–
JN635246
HQ261249
–
–
Phytophthora boehmeriae
CBS291.29
Clade 10
–
–
–
HQ708221
HQ665190
–
P1257
Clade 10
–
–
JN635228
–
–
–
P6950
Clade 10
–
–
–
–
EU080166
–
Phytophthora botryosa
P1044
Clade 2
–
–
JN635168
–
–
–
Phytophthora brassicae
CBS178.87
Clade 8
–
–
–
HQ708225
HQ665144
–
P10155
Clade 8
–
–
JN635172
–
–
–
P3273
Clade 8
–
–
JN635066
–
–
–
Phytophthora cactorum
CBS108.09
Clade 1
–
–
–
KJ128035
KJ128036
–
P0714
Clade 1
–
–
JN635210
–
–
–
P10365
Clade 1
–
–
JN635194
–
–
–
Phytophthora capsici
CBS554.88
Clade 2
–
–
–
HQ708250
HQ665266
–
P6522
Clade 2
–
–
JN635061
–
–
–
Phytophthora captiosa
P10719
Clade 9
–
–
JN635227
–
–
–
P10720
Clade 9
–
–
JN635229
–
–
–
Phytophthora cinnamomi
CBS144.22
Clade 7
–
–
–
HQ708257
HQ665126
–
Phytophthora cinnamomi var. parvispora
CBS411.96
Clade 7
–
–
–
HQ708268
HQ665231
–
Phytophthora cinnamomi var. robiniae
P16351
Clade 7
–
–
JN635269
–
–
–
Phytophthora citricola
CBS221.88
Clade 2
–
–
–
HQ708269
HQ665161
–
Phytophthora citrophthora
CBS950.87
Clade 2
–
–
–
HQ708272
HQ665305
–
P1212
Clade 2
–
–
JN635223
–
–
–
Phytophthora clandestina
P3942
Clade 1
–
–
JN635111
–
–
–
Phytophthora colocasiae
P6102
Clade 2
–
–
JN635058
–
–
–
Phytophthora cryptogea
P16165
Clade 8
–
–
JN635259
–
–
–
CBS468.81
Clade 8
–
–
–
HQ708276
HQ665238
–
Phytophthora drechsleri
P10331
Clade 8
–
–
–
–
EU079511
–
P1087
Clade 8
–
–
–
HQ261299
–
–
P1087
Clade 8
–
–
JN635260
–
–
–
Phytophthora erythroseptica
CBS129.23
Clade 8
–
–
–
HQ708286
HQ665121
–
P1693
Clade 8
–
–
JN635249
–
–
–
Phytophthora europaea
P10324
Clade 7
–
–
JN635189
–
–
–
Phytophthora fallax
P10722
Clade 9
–
–
JN635219
–
–
–
Phytophthora foliorum
P10969
Clade 8
–
–
–
HQ261307
EU079704
–
Phytophthora fragariae
CBS209.46
Clade 7
–
–
–
HQ708294
HQ665150
–
P1435
Clade 7
–
–
JN635233
–
–
–
Phytophthora frigida
P16051
Clade 2
–
–
JN635162
–
–
–
Phytophthora gonapodyides
CBS363.79
Clade 6
–
–
–
–
HQ665216
–
CBS554.67
Clade 6
–
–
–
HQ708297
HQ665265
–
P10337
Clade 6
–
–
JN635201
–
–
–
P3700
Clade 6
–
–
JN635141
–
–
–
Phytophthora hedraiandra
CBS118732
Clade 1
–
–
–
HQ708300
–
–
PDA331
Clade 1
–
–
–
–
EU080880
–
Phytophthora heveae
CBS296.29
Clade 5
–
–
–
HQ708301
HQ665194
–
P10167
Clade 5
–
–
JN635090
–
–
–
Phytophthora hibernalis
P3822
Clade 8
–
–
JN635091
–
–
–
Phytophthora himalayensis
CBS357.59
Clade 8
–
–
–
–
HQ665215
–
Phytophthora humicola
CBS200.81
Clade 6
–
–
–
–
HQ665148
–
P3826
Clade 6
–
–
JN635108
–
–
–
Phytophthora idaei
P6767
Clade 1
–
–
JN635116
–
–
–
Phytophthora ilicis
P3939
Clade 3
–
–
JN635092
–
–
–
Phytophthora infestans
CBS366.51
Clade 1
–
–
–
HQ708309
HQ665217
HQ643247
Phytophthora insolita
P6703
Clade 9
–
–
JN635140
–
–
–
Phytophthora inundata
CBS215.85
Clade 6
–
–
–
HQ708311
HQ665154
–
P8478
Clade 6
–
–
JN635083
–
EU079946
–
Phytophthora ipomoeae
P10225
Clade 1
–
–
JN635181
–
–
–
Phytophthora iranica
CBS374.72
Clade 1
–
–
–
HQ708314
HQ665219
–
Phytophthora katsurae
CBS587.85
Clade 5
–
–
–
HQ708315
HQ665278
–
P10187
Clade 5
–
–
JN635173
–
–
–
Phytophthora kelmania
P10613
Clade 8
–
–
JN635103
–
–
–
Phytophthora kernoviae
P10958
Clade 10
–
–
–
HQ261349
EU080057
–
P10958
Clade 10
–
–
JN635237
–
–
–
Phytophthora lateralis
CBS168.42
Clade 8
–
–
–
–
KJ128037
–
Lev1213
Clade 8
–
–
–
HQ708320
–
–
Phytophthora macrochlamydospora
P1026
Clade 9
–
–
JN635190
–
–
–
Phytophthora meadii
CBS219.88
Clade 2
–
–
–
HQ708324
HQ665159
–
Phytophthora medicaginis
P7029
Clade 8
–
–
JN635096
–
–
–
Phytophthora megakarya
P1672
Clade 4
–
–
–
HQ261357
–
–
P1672
Clade 4
–
–
JN635250
–
–
–
P8516
Clade 4
–
–
–
–
EU079974
–
Phytophthora megasperma
CBS402.72
Clade 6
–
–
–
HQ708329
HQ665228
–
Phytophthora megasperma
P10340
Clade 6
–
–
JN635176
–
–
–
Phytophthora melonis
CBS582.69
Clade 7
–
–
–
HQ708336
HQ665274
–
P3609
Clade 7
–
–
JN635049
–
–
–
Phytophthora mengei
P10139
Clade 2
–
–
JN635038
–
–
–
Phytophthora mirabilis
CBS678.85
Clade 1
–
–
–
HQ708339
HQ665285
–
P10231
Clade 1
–
–
JN635179
–
–
–
Phytophthora multivesiculata
CBS545.96
Clade 2
–
–
–
HQ708340
HQ665257
–
Phytophthora multivora
P1233
Clade 2
–
–
JN635155
–
–
–
Phytophthora nemorosa
P10288
Clade 3
–
–
JN635183
–
–
–
Phytophthora nicotianae
CBS303.29
Clade 1
–
–
–
HQ708352
–
–
P10297
Clade 1
–
–
JN635184
–
–
–
P7146
Clade 1
–
–
–
–
EU079560
–
Phytophthora palmivora
CBS298.29
Clade 4
–
–
–
HQ708357
HQ665195
–
P0113
Clade 4
–
–
JN635188
–
–
–
P0255
Clade 4
–
–
JN635186
HQ261382
EU080343
–
Phytophthora parsiana
P21281
Clade 9
–
–
JN635161
–
–
–
P21282
Clade 9
–
–
JN635160
HQ261384
–
–
Phytophthora phaseoli
CBS556.88
Clade 1
–
–
–
HQ708359
HQ665267
–
P10145
Clade 1
–
–
JN635167
–
–
–
Phytophthora pinifolia
P16100
Clade 6
–
–
–
HQ261390
–
–
P16100
Clade 6
–
–
JN635272
–
–
–
Phytophthora polonica
P15004
Clade 9
–
–
–
HQ261394
EU080268
–
P15005
Clade 9
–
–
JN635240
–
–
–
Phytophthora porri
CBS567.86
Clade 8
–
–
–
HQ708368
HQ665271
–
P10728
Clade 8
–
–
JN635236
–
–
–
Phytophthora primulae
P10220
Clade 8
–
–
JN635180
–
–
–
P10333
Clade 8
–
–
JN635187
HQ261397
EU080403
–
Phytophthora pseudosyringae
P1 0443
Clade 3
–
–
–
–
EU080026
–
P16355
Clade 3
–
–
JN635257
HQ261399
–
–
Phytophthora pseudotsugae
CBS444.84
Clade 1
–
–
–
HQ708381
HQ665234
–
P10218
Clade 1
–
–
JN635207
–
–
–
Phytophthora quercetorum
P15555
Clade 4
–
–
–
HQ261404
–
–
PD01105
Clade 4
–
–
–
–
EU080905
–
Phytophthora quercina
P10334
Clade 4
–
–
JN635198
–
–
–
Phytophthora quininea
CBS407.48
Clade 9
–
–
–
HQ708386
HQ665230
–
P3247
Clade 9
–
–
JN635110
–
–
–
Phytophthora ramorum
CBS101553
Clade 8
–
–
–
HQ708387
HQ665053
–
P10301
Clade 8
–
–
JN635185
–
–
–
Phytophthora richardiae
P3876
Clade 8
–
–
JN635045
–
–
–
Phytophthora rosacearum
P8048
Clade 6
–
–
JN635062
–
–
–
P8049
Clade 6
–
–
JN635057
–
–
–
Phytophthora rubi
CBS967.95
Clade 7
–
–
–
–
HQ665306
–
Phytophthora sansomea
P3163
Clade 8
–
–
JN635047
–
–
–
Phytophthora sinensis
CBS557.88
Clade 7
–
–
–
–
HQ665269
–
Phytophthora siskiyouensis
P15122
Clade 2
–
–
–
HQ261421
HQ665311
–
P15123
Clade 2
–
–
–
–
HQ665312
–
Phytophthora sojae
CBS382.61
Clade 7
–
–
–
–
HQ665224
–
Phytophthora sp aacrimae
P15880
Clade 6
–
–
JN635255
–
–
–
Phytophthora sp asparagi
P10707
Clade 6
–
–
JN635226
–
–
–
Phytophthora sp canalensis
P10456
Clade 6
–
–
JN635174
–
–
–
Phytophthora sp cuyabensis
P8213
Clade 9
–
–
JN635084
–
–
–
Phytophthora sp lagoriana
P8220
Clade 9
–
–
JN635085
–
–
–
Phytophthora sp napoensis
P8225
Clade 9
–
–
JN635082
–
–
–
Phytophthora sp niederhauserii
P10617
Clade 7
–
–
JN635212
–
EU080247
–
Phytophthora sp novaeguinee
P3389
Clade 5
–
–
JN635067
–
–
–
Phytophthora sp ohioensis
P16050
Clade 4
–
–
JN635265
–
–
–
Phytophthora sp personii
P11555
Clade 6
–
–
JN635134
–
–
–
Phytophthora sp sulawesiensis
P6306
Clade 6
–
–
JN635095
–
–
–
Phytophthora syringae
CBS132.23
Clade 8
–
–
–
HQ708404
HQ665123
–
P10330
Clade 8
–
–
JN635193
–
–
–
Phytophthora tabaci
CBS305.29
Clade 1
–
–
–
HQ708411
HQ665198
–
Phytophthora tentaculata
CBS552.96
Clade 1
–
–
–
HQ708413
HQ665264
–
P10363
Clade 1
–
–
JN635192
–
–
–
Phytophthora thermophilum
P1896
Clade 9
–
–
JN635117
–
–
–
Phytophthora trifolii
P1462
Clade 8
–
–
JN635065
–
–
–
Phytophthora tropicalis
CBS434.91
Clade 2
–
–
–
HQ708417
HQ665233
–
Phytophthora tropicalistype
P10329
Clade 2
–
–
JN635099
–
–
–
Phytophthora uliginosa
P10328
Clade 7
–
–
JN635175
–
–
–
P10413
Clade 7
–
–
JN635202
–
–
–
Phytopythium boreale
CBS551.88
Phytopythium
AY598662
–
–
HQ708419
–
–
Phytopythium carbonicum
CBS112544
Phytopythium
HQ643373
–
–
HQ708420
–
–
Phytopythium chamaehyphon
CBS259.30
Phytopythium
AY598666
–
–
HQ708421
–
–
Phytopythium citrinum
CBS119171
Phytopythium
HQ643375
–
–
HQ708422
–
–
Phytopythium delawarense
OH382/CBS123040
Phytopythium
KF853241
–
–
KF853240
–
EU339312
Phytopythium helicoides
CBS286.31
Phytopythium
AY598665
–
–
HQ708430
–
–
Phytopythium kandeliae
CBS113.91
Phytopythium
–
–
–
HQ708206
HQ665079
HQ643133
AT CC66501 /P11614
Phytopythium
–
–
GU994166
–
–
–
Phytopythium litorale
CBS118360
Phytopythium
HQ643386
–
–
HQ708433
–
–
CBS122662
Phytopythium
–
–
–
–
HQ665114
HQ643385
Phytopythium mercuriale
A89 (GENBANK)
Phytopythium
–
–
–
–
–
JN630486
CBS122443
Phytopythium
KF853243
–
–
KF853239
KF853236
–
Phytopythium mirpurense
CBS124523
Phytopythium
KJ831613
–
–
KJ831612
–
–
CBS124524
Phytopythium
–
–
–
–
KJ831614
KJ831614
Phytopythium montanum
CBS111349
Phytopythium
HQ643389
–
–
HQ708436
–
–
Phytopythium oedochilum
CBS292.37
Phytopythium
AY598664
–
–
HQ708439
–
–
Phytopythium ostracodes
CBS768.73
Phytopythium
AY598663
–
–
HQ708442
–
–
Phytopythium sindhum
CBS124518
Phytopythium
HQ643396
–
–
HQ708443
–
–
Phytopythium vexans
CBS119.80
Phytopythium
HQ643400
–
–
HQ708447
–
–
Pythium abappressorium
CBS110198
Clade F
HQ643408
–
–
HQ708455
–
–
Pythium acanthicum
CBS377.34
Clade D
AY598617
–
–
HQ708456
–
–
Pythium acanthophoron
CBS337.29
Clade J
AY598711
–
–
HQ708460
–
–
Pythium acrogynum
CBS549.88
Clade E
–
–
–
–
HQ665258
–
Pythium adhaerens
CBS520.74
Clade B
AY598619
–
–
HQ708462
–
–
Pythium amasculinum
CBS552.88
Clade D
AY598671
–
–
HQ708481
–
–
Pythium anandrum
CBS285.31
Clade H
AY598650
–
–
HQ708482
–
–
Pythium angustatum
CBS522.74
Clade B
AY598623
–
–
HQ708484
–
–
Pythium aphanidermatum
CBS118.80
Clade A
AY598622
–
–
HQ708485
–
–
Pythium apiculatum
CBS120945
Clade E
HQ643443
–
–
HQ708490
–
–
Pythium apleroticum
CBS772.81
Clade B
AY598631
–
–
HQ708491
–
–
Pythium aquatile
CBS215.80
Clade B
AY598632
–
–
–
HQ665153
–
Pythium aristosporum
CBS263.38
Clade B
AY598627
–
–
HQ708494
HQ665179
–
Pythium arrhenomanes
CBS324.62
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708499
HQ665208
–
Pythium attrantheridium
DAOM230383
Clade F
–
–
–
HQ708524
HQ665308
–
DAO M 230386
Clade F
HQ643476
–
–
–
–
–
Pythium buismaniae
CBS288.31
Clade J
AY598659
–
–
–
HQ665188
–
Pythium camurandrum
CBS124096
Clade E
–
–
–
HQ708527
–
–
Pythium canariense
CBS112353
Clade G
–
–
–
HQ708528
HQ665069
–
Pythium capillosum
CBS222.94
Clade B
AY598635
–
–
HQ708529
HQ665164
–
Pythium carolinianum
CBS122659
Clade E
–
–
–
HQ708530
HQ665111
–
Pythium catenulatum
CBS842.68
Clade B
AY598675
–
–
HQ708540
HQ665302
–
Pythium chondricola
CBS203.85
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708544
HQ665149
–
Pythium coloratum
CBS154.64
Clade B
AY598633
–
–
HQ708547
HQ665128
–
Pythium conidiophorum
CBS223.88
Clade B
AY598629
–
–
HQ708555
HQ665166
–
Pythium contiguanum
CBS221.94
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708560
HQ665162
–
Pythium cryptoirregulare
CBS118731
Clade F
HQ643515
–
–
HQ708561
HQ665083
–
Pythium cylindrosporum
CBS218.94
Clade F
AY598643
–
–
HQ708562
HQ665157
–
Pythium cystogenes
CBS675.85
Clade J
HQ643518
–
–
HQ708564
HQ665284
–
Pythium debaryanum
CBS752.96
Clade F
AY598704
–
–
HQ708565
HQ665294
–
Pythium deliense
CBS314.33
Clade A
AY598674
–
–
HQ708568
HQ665204
–
Pythium diclinum
CBS664.79
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708570
HQ665282
–
Pythium dimorphum
CBS406.72
Clade H
AY598651
–
–
HQ708571
HQ665229
–
Pythium dissimile
CBS155.64
Clade B
AY598681
–
–
HQ708572
HQ665130
–
Pythium dissotocum
CBS166.68
Clade B
AY598634
–
–
HQ708574
HQ665139
–
Pythium echinulatum
CBS281.64
Clade E
AY598639
–
–
HQ708577
HQ665183
–
Pythium emineosum
BR479
Clade F
–
–
–
GQ244423
–
–
Pythium erinaceus
CBS505.80
Clade E
–
–
–
HQ708578
HQ665243
–
Pythium flevoense
CBS234.72
Clade B
AY598691
–
–
HQ708580
HQ665170
–
CBS278.81
Clade B
–
–
–
–
HQ665182
–
Pythium folliculosum
CBS220.94
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708584
HQ665160
–
Pythium glomeratum
CBS120914
Clade I
HQ643543
–
–
–
HQ665091
–
Pythium graminicola
CBS327.62
Clade B
AY598625
–
–
HQ708589
HQ665211
–
Pythium grandisporangium
CBS286.79
Clade C
AY598692
–
–
HQ708590
HQ665187
–
Pythium helicandrum
CBS393.54
Clade H
AY598653
–
–
HQ708592
HQ665225
–
Pythium heterothallicum
CBS450.67
Clade I
AY598654
–
–
HQ708597
HQ665235
–
Pythium hydnosporum
CBS253.60
Clade D
AY598672
–
–
HQ708608
HQ665175
–
Pythium hypogynum
CBS234.94
Clade E
AY598693
–
–
HQ708609
HQ665171
–
Pythium inflatum
CBS168.68
Clade B
AY598626
–
–
HQ708610
HQ665140
–
Pythium insidiosum
ATCC 58643
Clade C
AF289981
–
–
–
–
–
CBS574.85
Clade C
–
–
–
HQ708614
HQ665273
–
Pythium intermedium
CBS266.38
Clade F
AY598647
–
–
HQ708616
HQ665180
–
Pythium irregulare
CBS250.28
Clade F
AY598702
–
–
HQ708640
HQ665172
–
Pythium iwayamai
CBS156.64
Clade G
AY598648
–
–
HQ708713
HQ665131
–
Pythium kashmirense
ADC0819
Clade B
–
HQ643671
–
–
–
–
CBS122908
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708715
HQ665118
–
Pythium kunmingense
CBS550.88
Clade F
AY598647
–
–
–
HQ665259
–
Pythium longisporangium
CBS122646
Clade E
–
–
–
HQ708724
HQ665099
–
Pythium lucens
CBS113342
Clade F
HQ643681
–
–
HQ708725
HQ665077
–
Pythium lutarium
CBS222.88
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ643682
HQ665163
–
Pythium lycopersici
CBS122909
Clade D
–
–
–
HQ708727
HQ665119
–
Pythium macrosporum
CBS574.80
Clade F
AY598646
–
–
HQ708728
HQ665272
–
Pythium marsipium
CBS773.81
Clade E
–
–
–
HQ708734
HQ665297
–
Pythium mastophorum
CBS375.72
Clade J
AY598661
–
–
HQ708735
HQ665220
–
Pythium megacarpum
CBS112351
Phytopythium
–
–
–
–
–
HQ643388
Pythium middletonii
CBS528.74
Clade E
–
–
–
HQ708738
HQ665249
–
Pythium minus
CBS122657
Clade E
–
–
–
HQ708739
HQ665109
–
CBS226.88
Clade E
AY598698
–
–
HQ643696
–
–
Pythium monospermum
CBS158.73
Clade A
HQ643697
–
–
HQ708741
HQ665137
–
Pythium multisporum
CBS470.50
Clade E
AY598641
–
–
HQ708744
HQ665239
–
Pythium myriotylum
CBS254.70
Clade B
AY598678
–
–
HQ708745
HQ665176
–
Pythium nagaii
CBS779.96
Clade G
AY598705
–
–
HQ708749
HQ665299
–
Pythium nodosum
CBS102274
Clade J
–
–
–
HQ708753
HQ665055
–
Pythium nunn
CBS808.96
Clade J
AY598709
–
–
HQ708755
HQ665300
–
Pythium okanoganense
CBS315.81
Clade G
AY598649
–
–
–
HQ665205
–
Pythium oligandrum
CBS382.34
Clade D
AY598618
–
–
HQ708759
HQ665223
–
Pythium oopapillum
BR632
Clade B
–
–
–
FJ655178
–
–
Pythium ornacarpum
CBS112350
Clade E
HQ643721
–
–
HQ708762
HQ665066
–
Pythium ornamentatum
CBS122665
Clade D
–
–
–
HQ708763
HQ665117
–
Pythium orthogonon
CBS376.72
Clade J
–
–
–
HQ708764
HQ665221
–
Pythium pachycaule
CBS227.88
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708765
HQ665169
–
Pythium paddicum
CBS698.83
Clade G
AY598707
–
–
HQ708769
HQ665290
–
Pythium paroecandrum
CBS157.64
Clade F
AY598644
–
–
–
HQ665133
–
Pythium parvum
CBS225.88
Clade E
AY598697
–
–
HQ708779
HQ665167
–
Pythium pectinolyticum
CBS122643
Clade B
HQ643739
–
–
HQ708780
HQ665096
–
Pythium periilum
CBS169.68
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708781
HQ665141
–
Pythium periplocum
CBS289.31
Clade D
AY598670
–
–
HQ708784
HQ665189
–
Pythium perplexum
CBS674.85
Clade J
AY598658
–
–
HQ708785
HQ665283
–
Pythium pleroticum
CBS776.81
Clade E
AY598642
–
–
HQ708789
HQ665298
–
Pythium plurisporium
CBS100530
Clade B
AY598684
–
–
HQ708790
HQ665052
–
Pythium polymastum
CBS811.70
Clade J
AY598660
–
–
HQ708793
HQ665301
–
Pythium porphyrae
CBS369.79
Clade A
AY598673
–
–
HQ708794
HQ665218
–
Pythium prolatum
CBS845.68
Clade H
AY598652
–
–
HQ708795
HQ665303
–
Pythium pyrilobum
CBS158.64
Clade B
AY598636
–
–
HQ708796
HQ665136
–
Pythium radiosum
CBS217.94
Clade E
–
–
–
–
HQ665156
–
Pythium rhizooryzae
CBS119169
Clade B
HQ643757
–
–
HQ708798
HQ665087
–
Pythium rhizosaccharum
CBS112356
Clade E
–
–
–
HQ708801
HQ665072
–
Pythium rostratifingens
CBS115464
Clade E
HQ643761
–
–
HQ708802
HQ665080
–
Pythium rostratum
CBS533.74
Clade E
AY598696
–
–
HQ708808
HQ665252
–
Pythium salpingophorum
CBS471.50
Clade B
AY598630
–
–
HQ708809
HQ665240
–
Pythium scleroteichum
CBS294.37
Clade B
AY598680
–
–
HQ708812
HQ665192
–
Pythium segnitium
CBS112354
Clade E
HQ643772
–
–
HQ708813
HQ665070
–
Pythium senticosum
CBS122490
Clade H
HQ643773
–
–
HQ708814
HQ665093
–
Pythium sp balticum
CBS122649
Clade F
–
–
–
HQ708525
–
–
Pythium sp
CBS113341
Clade F
KF853244
–
–
–
–
–
Pythium sp CAL-2011a
CBS122647
Clade D
–
–
–
HQ708815
–
–
Pythium sp CAL-2011e
CBS122648
Clade E
–
–
–
HQ708770
HQ665101
–
Pythium sp CAL-2011f
CBS101876
Clade J
HQ643778
–
–
HQ708819
–
–
Pythium spiculum
CBS122645
Clade F
KF853242
–
–
–
HQ665098
–
Pythium spinosum
CBS275.67
Clade F
AY598701
–
–
HQ708834
HQ665181
–
Pythium splendens
CBS462.48
Clade I
AY598655
–
–
HQ708836
HQ665237
–
Pythium sterilum
B09
Phytopythium
–
–
–
–
–
EU240096
Pythium sukuiense
CBS110030
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708877
HQ665059
–
Pythium sylvaticum
CBS453.67
Clade F
AY598645
–
–
HQ708886
HQ665236
–
Pythium takayamanum
CBS122491
Clade E
HQ643854
–
–
HQ708895
HQ665094
–
Pythium terrestris
CBS112352
Clade F
–
–
–
HQ708898
HQ665068
–
Pythium torulosum
CBS316.33
Clade B
AY598624
–
–
HQ708900
HQ665206
–
Pythium tracheiphilum
CBS323.65
Clade B
–
–
–
HQ708903
HQ665207
–
Pythium ultimum var. sporangiiferum
CBS219.65
Clade I
AKYB02045405
–
–
HQ708920
HQ665158
–
Pythium ultimum var. ultimum
CBS398.51
Clade I
AY598657
–
–
HQ708906
HQ665227
–
Pythium uncinulatum
CBS518.77
Clade J
AY598712
–
–
HQ708985
HQ665244
–
Pythium undulatum
CBS157.69
Clade H
AY598708
–
–
HQ708987
HQ665134
–
Pythium vanterpoolii
CBS295.37
Clade B
AY598685
–
–
HQ708993
HQ665193
–
Pythium viniferum
CBS119168
Clade F
HQ643956
–
–
HQ708997
HQ665086
–
Pythium violae
CBS132.37
Clade G
AY598717
–
–
–
–
–
CBS159.64
Clade G
AY598706
–
–
HQ708999
HQ665138
–
Pythium volutum
CBS699.83
Clade B
AY598686
–
–
HQ709012
HQ665291
–
Pythium zingiberis
CBS216.82
Clade B
–
–
HQ709014
HQ665155
–
Phylogenetic analyses
Sequences were edited manually using the DNAStar Lasergene 9 Suite (Bioinformatics Pioneer DNAStar, Inc., WI) or Geneious v. 6.1.6 (Biomatters http://www.geneious.com/). Multiple alignments of each gene region were generated using MAFFT (Katoh et al. 2005). The genera included in the phylogenetic analyses were Albugo, Halophytophthora, Phytophthora, Phytopythium and Pythium. Isolates of Albugo candida from the order Albuginales were included as an outgroup.In order to include the maximum molecular data for clade K Pythium the invalid species Pythium sterile and Pythium megacarpum as well as two strains of the novel species Phytopythium mirpurense are considered in a cladogram generated based on ITS sequence data. Pythium ultimum from clade I and Pythium dimorphum from clade H are outgroups in these analyses and representatives of Phytophthora, P. infestans, P. ramorum and P. sojae are included. The aligned data matrix from 23 strains contained 1 096 characters from the ITS1, ITS2 and the 5.8S gene.The aligned data matrices were assessed to find the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution using jMODELTEST (Posada 2008). In each case this was identified as General Time Reversible (GTR+I+G). Redundant sequences were identified and those with 100 % identity to other included taxa were removed from the analyses. These duplicates are catalogued in Table 2. The aligned data matrices contained 1 374 bp of D1–D3 regions of LSU with 176 strains, 1 724 bp of SSU rRNA with 159 strains and 680 bp of COI with 174 strains. The sequence alignments were subjected to maximum likelihood analysis using the GTR+I+G substitution model and the Best option for tree topology search with PhyML v. 3.0 (Guindon & Gascuel 2003) to obtain ML trees which were rooted to Albugo (LSU, COI and SSU) or Pythium (ITS). Nonparametric ML bootstraps were calculated with 1 000 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian inferences (BI) were generated using MrBayes v. 3.2.1 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003) with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology to calculate posterior probabilities of the phylogenetic trees. The program was run for 20 M generations for the LSU, 40 M generations for the COI, 50 M generations for the SSU and 10 M for the ITS datasets with the GTR+I+G model of evolution for each gene. The first 25 % of the iterations were discarded as burn-in and every 1 000th iteration was sampled from the remainder. The trees were considered to be fully converged when the average standard deviation of split frequencies reached a level less than 0.01. FigTree v. 1.3.1 (http://tree.bio. ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) was used to view and edit ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees. Consensus trees were generated using the 50 % majority rule tree criteria and rooted to Albugo (LSU, COI and SSU) or Pythium (ITS).
Table 2
Species and isolates not included in the study for strains that were 100 % identical for certain genes and therefore not included in the phylogenetic analyses.
Sequence included in phylogeny
Identical sequences not included in phylogenies
Species
Strain
Clade
GenBank
Species
Strain
Clade
GenBank
SSU
Phytophthora alticola
P16053
Clade 4
JN635264
Phytophthora frigida
P16051
Clade 2
JN635162
Phytophthora asparagi
P10707
Clade 6
JN635226
Phytophthora rosacearum
P8048
Clade 6
JN635062
Phytophthora cactorum
P0714
Clade 1
JN635210
Phytophthora cactorum
P10365
Clade 1
JN635194
Phytophthora captiosa
P10719
Clade 9
JN635227
Phytophthora captiosa
P10720
Clade 9
JN635229
Phytophthora cryptogea
P16165
Clade 8
JN635259
Phytophthora pseudosyringae
P16355
Clade 3
JN635257
Phytophthora erythroseptica
P1693
Clade 8
JN635249
Phytophthora gonapodyides
P3700
Clade 6
JN635141
Phytophthora richardiae
P3876
Clade 8
JN635045
Phytophthora sansomea
P3163
Clade 8
JN635047
Phytophthora trifolii
P1462
Clade 8
JN635065
Phytophthora europaea
P10324
Clade 7
JN635189
Phytophthora uliginosa
P10328
Clade 7
JN635175
Phytophthora uliginosa
P10413
Clade 7
JN635202
Phytophthora lagoriana
P8220
Clade 9
JN635085
Phytophthora lagoriana
P8223
Clade 9
JN635086
Phytophthora parsiana
P21282
Clade 9
JN635160
Phytophthora palmivora
P0113
Clade 4
JN635188
Phytophthora palmivora
P0255
Clade 4
JN635186
Phytophthora primulae
P10220
Clade 8
JN635180
Phytophthora primulae
P10333
Clade 8
JN635187
Pythium flevoense
CBS23472
Clade B
AY598691
Pythium pectinolyticum
CBS122643
Clade B
HQ643739
Pythium minus
CBS22688
Clade E
AY598698
Pythium pleroticum
CBS776.81
Clade E
AY598642
Pythium parvum
CBS225.88
Clade E
AY598697
Pythium porphyrae
CBS36979
Clade A
AY598673
Pythium adhaerens
CBS520.74
Clade B
AY598619
Pythium salinum
CBS113341
Clade F
KF853244
Pythium attrantheridium
DAOM230386
Clade F
HQ643476
Pythium spinosum
CBS27567
Clade F
AY598701
Pythium violae
CBS132.37
Clade G
AY598717
Pythium lucens
CBS113342
Clade F
HQ643681
Pythium kunmingense
CBS55088
Clade F
AY598647
Pythium uncinulatum
CBS51877
Clade J
AY598712
Pythium buismaniae
CBS288.31
Clade J
AY598659
LSU
Phytophthora arecae
CBS30562
Clade 4
HQ665200
Phytophthora palmivora
CBS29829
Clade 4
HQ665195
Phytophthora boehmeriae
CBS29129
Clade 10
HQ665190
Phytophthora boehmeriae
P6950
Clade 10
EU080166
Phytophthora brassicae
CBS17887
Clade 8
HQ665144
Phytophthora brassicae
CBS178.87
Clade 8
HQ665144
Phytophthora erythroseptica
CBS12923
Clade 8
HQ665121
Phytophthora himalayensis
CBS35759
Clade 8
HQ665215
Phytophthora fragariae
CBS20946
Clade 7
HQ665150
Phytophthora rubi
CBS96795
Clade 7
HQ665306
Phytophthora gonapodyides
CBS55467
Clade 6
HQ665265
Phytophthora gonapodyides
CBS36379
Clade 6
HQ665216
Phytophthora inundata
P8478
Clade 6
EU079946
Phytophthora humicola
CBS20081
Clade 6
HQ665148
Phytophthora inundata
CBS21585
Clade 6
HQ665154
Phytophthora melonis
CBS58269
Clade 7
HQ665274
Phytophthora sinensis
CBS55788
Clade 7
HQ665269
Phytophthora sp “niederhauserii"
P10617
Clade 7
EU080247
Phytophthora sojae
CBS38261
Clade 7
HQ665224
Phytophthora siskiyouensis
P15123
Clade 2
HQ665312
Phytophthora siskiyouensis
P15122
Clade 2
HQ665311
Pythium amasculinum
CBS55288
Clade D
HQ665263
Pythium lycopersicum
CBS122909
Clade D
HQ665119
Pythium oligandrum
CBS38234
Clade D
HQ665223
Pythium apleroticum
CBS77281
Clade B
HQ665296
Pythium aquatile
CBS21580
Clade B
HQ665153
Pythium buismaniae
CBS28831
Clade J
HQ665188
Pythium polymastum
CBS81170
Clade J
HQ665301
Pythium capillosum
CBS22294
Clade B
HQ665164
Pythium flevoense
CBS27881
Clade B
HQ665182
Pythium flevoense
CBS23472
Clade B
HQ665170
Pythium catenulatum
CBS84268
Clade B
HQ665302
Pythium rhizo-oryzae
CBS119169
Clade B
HQ665087
Pythium viniferum
CBS119168
Clade F
HQ665086
Pythium debaryanum
CBS75296
Clade F
HQ665294
COI
Phytophthora arecae
CBS30562
Clade 4
HQ708218
Phytophthora palmivora
CBS29829
Clade 4
HQ643307
Pythium amasculinum
CBS55288
Clade D
HQ708481
Pythium lycopersicum
CBS122909
Clade D
HQ643683
Pythium ornamentatum
CBS122665
Clade D
HQ708763
Pythium conidiophorum
CBS22388
Clade B
HQ708555
Pythium salpingophorum
CBS47150
Clade B
HQ643768
Pythium debaryanum
CBS75296
Clade F
HQ708565
Pythium viniferum
CBS119168
Clade F
HQ643956
Pythium diclinum
CBS66479
Clade B
HQ708570
Pythium lutarium
CBS22288
Clade B
HQ643682
Pythium erinaceus
CBS50580
Clade E
HQ708578
Pythium ornacarpum
CBS112350
Clade E
HQ643721
Pythium folliculosum
CBS22094
Clade B
HQ708584
Pythium torulosum
CBS31633
Clade B
HQ643859
Pythium minus
CBS122657
Clade E
HQ708739
Pythium pleroticum
CBS77681
Clade E
HQ643748
Pythium myriotylum
CBS25470
Clade B
HQ708745
Pythium zingiberis
CBS21682
Clade B
HQ643973
Statistical analyses of pairwise distances
The alignments of COI, LSU and SSU used for phylogeny were also used to generate pairwise distance as was done for DNA barcode analyses (Robideau et al. 2011, Schoch et al. 2012). Statistical analyses and plots were performed with R (R Development Core Team, 2011). All pairwise distances involving a Phytopythium species against Pythium or Phytophthora were extracted, i.e. all pairwise distances involving any two Phytopythium species were excluded. An arcsine transformation of the distances was done to improve the variance homogeneity. ANOVA using ’lm’ was done with markers (COI/LSU/SSU), genera (Phytophthora/Pythium) or clades (clade 1–10 and A–J) as variables. Plots were generated with ’ggplot’ for R. The 0.05 confidence interval for 60 multiple comparisons was adjusted using the Bonferoni method. The average pairwise distance by marker was normalised to remove the bias from the difference in number of species between Pythium and Phytophthora.
Isolation and identification of Phytopythium mirpurense
Stagnant water was collected and immediately brought to the laboratory for the isolation of oomycetous fungi by the baiting technique of Harvey (1925). Grass blades, dicot leaves, hemp seeds, sesame seeds, lemon leaf and young cucumber stems were used as baits. Plates were incubated at room temperature, between 22–25 °C. Hyphae were observed on the baits after 5–8 days of incubation. The baits were rinsed in sterilised water to remove excess contaminants and transferred to fresh plates half-filled with sterile water. New fresh baits were then added and monitored daily for colonisation by oomycetes. After 2 d of incubation, the baits colonised by oomycetous fungi were transferred onto corn-meal agar (CMA) medium for purification by hyphal tip transfer. To obtain a pure culture a small disc of the CMA culture was placed into the centre of wateragar plates. After 15–24 h growing apical hyphae were cut with the aid of a microscope in the laminar flow hood and transferred onto the surface of a fresh plate containing culture media.For the assessment of cardinal temperatures, the isolates from this study were sub-cultured in two replicates on CMA in 90 mm Petri plates, and incubated at 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 °C for 5 d. Radial growth was measured daily along two lines intersecting the centre of the inoculum. Isolates were also grown on potatodextrose agar (PDA), potatocarrotagar (PCA), CMA and corn meal dextrose agar (CMDA) in 90 mm Petri plates (recipes according to Crous et al. 2009), and colony characteristics were assessed after incubation for 5 d at 25 °C.Water cultures for zoospore and sporangial production were prepared by adding an inoculum disc and a grass blade to sterile water in a Petri plate and incubating at 25 °C. Biometric values i.e aplerotic index, ooplast index and wall index were determined for 20 oogonia with the method described by Shahzad et al. (1992).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Morphological comparison of Phytopythium with Phytophthora and Pythium
Most species in the genus Phytopythium produce papillate, internally proliferating sporangia (Fig. 1). The shape of the sporangia is more or less similar to the shape of papillate Phytophthora sporangia: (sub-)globose to ovoid and papillate (Fig. 1). However, in Phytophthora the papillate sporangium type never shows internal proliferation. The combination of internal proliferation and papillation (Fig. 1) is unique to sporangia of Phytopythium and some Pythium species (see below). Also, the papillae in Phytopythium are different from the papillae in Phytophthora sporangia. In Phytopythium the sporangia are initially non-papillate, and the papillae develop at maturity and do not consist of a hyaline ’apical thickening’ as in Phytophthora (Blackwell 1949). They may grow out to form a shorter or larger discharge tube (Fig. 1d, f, g, i, j), which does not occur in Phytophthora. In some species the papilla is not the place where the plasma flows out, rather one or more discharge tubes are formed more basally of the sporangium. In some species the papilla grows out and develops branches (Fig. 1e). Another difference with Phytophthora is the zoospore discharge which is pythium-like in Phytopythium: the plasma flows out of the sporangium through a discharge tube to form a plasma-filled vesicle at the tip. Zoospores are developed outside the sporangium, within the vesicle membrane and are released after rupture of the membrane (Fig. 1a). According to Marano et al. (2014), Phytopythium kandeliae has zoospore release mostly like Pythium and occasionally in between Pythium and Phytophthora: zoospores developed (partly) inside a sporangium and partly in a vesicle.
Fig. 1
Sporangia of Phytopythium species. a. P. sindhum, four stages of sporangium development showing a young, globose sporangium, a mature, papillate sporangium, internal proliferation and pythium-like zoospore development; b. P. vexans, subglobose, non-papillate sporangia; c–g. P. citrinum: c. normal sporangia; d. outgrowing papillae; e. outgrowing and branching papilla; f. empty sporangium with internal proliferation and short discharge tube; g. empty sporangium with internal proliferation and long discharge tube (arrow indicating tip); h–j. P. helicandrum: h. sessile, globose, papillate sporangium; i. outgrowing papilla; j. empty sporangium with intermediate sized discharge tube (arrow indicating tip). — Scale bars = 20 μm.
Another unique characteristic of Phytopythium is the shape of the antheridium (Fig. 2). In most species the antheridia are elongate, cylindrical, often with constrictions. The fertilisation tube is mostly not apical but in ’navel position’ (Fig. 2a, b, c, d, arrows). Occasionally club-shaped antheridia with apical attachment occur. In P. vexans, the antheridia are often very broadly attached to the oogonium and lobed (Fig. 2e, f).
Fig. 2
Oogonia and antheridia of Phytopythium species. a. P. sindhum, slightly elongated antheridium; b–c. P. oedochilum, long cylindrical antheridia; d. P. mirpurense, elongate antheridium with slight constriction; e–f. P. vexans: e. elongate antheridium with distinct constrictions; f. antheridium with two lobes. Arrows indicate the fertilisation tube in navel position (a–d). — Scale bars = 10 μm.
Papillate sporangia with internal proliferation also occur in a small number of Pythium species: three members of clade E (P. marsipium, P. middletonii, P. multisporum), one member of clade G (P. nagaii) and clade C (P. grandisporangium) and all members of clade H (P. anandrum, P. dimorphum, P. helicandrum, P. prolatum, P. undulatum). However, none of these species except three has elongate, cylindrical or lobate antheridia. Only P. helicandrum has elongate antheridia, however, this species has ornamented oogonia and much bigger sporangia than any of the species in Phytopythium. Pythium marsipium has bell-shaped antheridia as they occur in Phytopythium vexans, however, its sporangia are utriform instead of ovoid. Pythium grandisporangium has lobate antheridia but this is a marine species with extremely large sporangia with a tapering neck rather than a distinct papilla.
Phylogenetic position of Phytopythium
Maximum likelihood analyses of nuclear (LSU and SSU) and mitochondrial DNA (COI) with Bayesian probability values mapped onto the trees are shown (Fig. 3A, B, C). These cladograms place all the strains belonging to the genus Phytopythium as a monophyletic group with bootstrap support (85–100 %) and high probabilities (0.99–1.00). Phylogenetic trees of the LSU and COI regions support this group as intermediary between Phytophthora and Pythium. There is phylogenetic support with two of the genes to group Phytopythium with Phytophthora (95 % / 1.00 for LSU and 79 % / 0.99 for COI). The SSU tree has Pythium clades A–D as grouping closer to Phytophthora and Halophytophthora, with very low bootstrap support and probabilities (< 50 % / 0.65). This suggests that given the SSU dataset, the major clades are unresolved in relation to the outgroup.
Fig. 3
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees of: a. LSU ribosomal RNA region; b. mitochondrial COI; c. SSU ribosomal RNA region. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values larger than 50 % are indicated numerically, those under 50 % are marked with (–). Posterior probability values larger than 0.50 are labelled numerically, those under 0.50 are marked (–) on each branch, those clades which were not present in the Bayesian trees are marked as (o), the scale bars represent the average number of substitutions per site.
Our results from phylogenetic analysis of nuclear (LSU and SSU) and mitochondrial (COI) genes with all available species of Pythium and Phytophthora support that Phytopythium is a distinct genus. Its placement as intermediate between Pythium and Phytophthora is supported by two of these datasets. In the three gene trees, this new genus clade was strongly supported by both ML bootstrap replicates and Bayesian probability values, which unambiguously confirmed the status of Phytopythium as a novel monophyletic genus. The maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses did not clearly delineate the relationships between the different groups in the part of the oomycete evolutionary tree we focused on. Inclusion of some of the more basal groups such as the Salisapiliaceae (Hulvey et al. 2010) and additional markers in future analyses would likely lead to greater resolution of these relationships.The ITS tree (Fig. 4) shows that the two strains of species P. mirpurense are both well embedded within Phytopythium with strong support (91 % / 0.96) and demonstrated the close relationships between P. litorale and Pythium sterile (100 / 1) as well as Phytopythium boreale and Pythium megacarpum (99 / 1).
Fig. 4
Maximum likelihood tree of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of Phytopythium spp., Pythium spp. and Phytophthora spp. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values larger than 50 % are indicated numerically, those under 50 % are marked with (–). Posterior probability values larger than 0.50 are labelled numerically, on each branch those clades which were not present in the Bayesian trees are marked as (o), the scale bars represent the average number of substitutions per site.
Markers, genera and clades as well as interactions between them all had a significant effect on pairwise distances of Phytopythium against Pythium and Phytophthora species (p < 10−15). The average pairwise distance of all Phytophthora species against all Phytopythium species using COI was 13.7 % whereas it was 14.5 % for all Pythium species against all Phytopythium, showing that Phytopythium is significantly closer to Phytophthora than Pythium (p < 10−16). For LSU, these differences were 10.4 % and 10.9 %, respectively, and were also significant (p < 10−16). For SSU, the trend was reversed, still significant, with the average pairwise distance between Pythium and Phytopythium being 2.5 % whereas the average between Phytophthora and Phytopythium was 2.7 %. The clade effect was significant, including a significant interaction with markers; therefore, the results are presented by clades and markers in Fig. 5. Each clade is compared against Phytopythium to show clades that have a significant difference from the average pairwise distance. The significant trend of Phytopythium being closer to Phytophthora clades than Pythium clades can be seen with COI and LSU whereas it is more difficult to visualise the reverse trend in SSU. With all markers, Pythium clades H and I were significantly closer to Phytopythium than were the other Pythium clades but for SSU there were three additional clades (B, F and G) that were significantly closer to Phytopythium than were the other clades.
Fig. 5
Analysis of all pairwise distances containing only one representative of each Phytopythium sp. The dotted lines represent the average of all these pairwise distances for each marker, adjusted to remove the bias for the difference in species number between Pythium and Phytophthora. The bars represent 95 % confidence intervals corrected by the Bonferoni method for 60 comparisons. The analysis was done with arcsine transformation, therefore, the averages as well as the upper and lower boundaries of the intervals were transformed back to actual pairwise distances for the plot. Intervals that are not touching the average dotted line are significantly below or above the average, i.e. closer to or more distant to Phytopythium, respectively.
Strains used in circumscription of the genus
There are two invalid species that were investigated for the sake of examining the complete range of Pythium species from clade K, namely Pythium megacarpum and P. sterile. Pythium megacarpum is an invalid species because no type was indicated at the time of publication. Lévesque & de Cock (2004) placed it as potentially synonymous with Phytopythium boreale and in the barcode analyses of Robideau et al. (2011) these two species were only distinguishable through COI sequence data analysis, not by ITS. Pythium sterile is an invalid taxon based on the nomination of two herbarium specimens as the type of this species; this contravenes Art. 40.3 of the Melbourne convention (McNeill et al. 2012). Pythium sterile possesses identical ITS sequences to Phytopythium litorale. Other sequences from this organism could not be compared since no strain of Pythium sterile is available. Both species do not produce sexual stages. A more extensive study of these pairs of species, namely, Phytopythium boreale / Pythium megacarpum and Phytopythium litorale / Pythium sterile including more isolates and more DNA regions should reveal whether P. sterile and P. megacarpum should be validated as legitimate species.There were some clade K species which were not included in the phylogenetic analyses presented here. In the studies by Lévesque & de Cock (2004) and Robideau et al. (2011) the species Pythium indigoferae appeared in clade K, which is now the genus Phytopythium. In stark contrast to the other species in clade K, Pythium indigoferae produces filamentous sporangia according to its original description (Butler 1907). The strain of Pythium indigoferae in the study of Lévesque & de Cock (2004) was the strain CBS 261.30 which was used by van der Plaats-Niterink (1981) in her publication ’Monograph of the genus Pythium’, as the ex-type strain was no longer available. However, CBS 261.30 is also no longer viable. Under observation by van der Plaats-Niterink and more recently while it was still culturable, this strain did not sporulate. The identity of this strain can therefore not be confirmed. Other strains with DNA sequences very close to CBS 261.30 have been identified (unpubl. data) which produced, however, subglobose, proliferating, papillate sporangia. These findings agree with Spies et al. (2011) who suggested that this strain be re-identified as Pythium vexans. CBS 261.30 and related strains are clearly part of a Phytopythium vexans complex that needs to be resolved through further phylogenetic study. This P. vexans complex also contains the invalid taxon Pythium cucurbitacearum, which was not included in our analyses. This taxon is invalid as it is missing a Latin diagnosis and based on Art. 36 of the Melbourne convention (McNeill et al. 2012). The representative strain of P. cucurbitacearum CBS 748.96 is no longer viable. The ITS sequence of this strain was reported by Spies et al. (2011), to be related yet distinct from a novel strain isolated from Acacia which was very different among the isolates in the monophyletic Phytopythium vexans complex studied. Most likely strain CBS 748.96 represents a distinct species from the P. vexans complex, which as of yet is not validly described. Once this complex is resolved it is likely that it will represent a number of new species for the genus Phytopythium.Two other Pythium species not included in the phylogenetic analyses are P. palingenes and P. polytylum. Because no living strains of these species are available, they could not be included in the DNA studies. Morphological data for P. palingenes and P. polytylum show the typical characters of Phytopythium: ovoid, papillate, internally proliferating sporangia and cylindrical antheridia. Therefore we consider P. palingenes and P. polytylum as members of Phytopythium.A new species of Phytopythium was isolated from water samples collected in District MirpurKhas of Sindh province, Pakistan. It is described and illustrated here as P. mirpurense (see section New Species). Genetically, Phytopythium mirpurense is shown to nestle within the genus Phytopythium, in all of the phylogenetic trees presented. The most obvious morphological characters of this new species are the proliferating, subglobose sporangia, terminal and intercalary oogonia, antheridia with lengthwise application to oogonia over their entire length, aplerotic to nearly plerotic oospores, and high optimum temperature for growth. These characters are shared with many other members of Phytopythium. The main differentiation of this species is shown through the molecular analyses of DNA sequences and the phylogenetic trees (Fig. 3, 4).Halophytophthora s.l. is a heterogenous, polyphyletic genus (Hulvey et al. 2010) with species of marine origin. Two species of this genus clustered within the clade of Phytopythium: H. operculata (originally described as Phytophthora operculata) and H. kandeliae. Further, only species of Halophytophthora s.str. (Hulvey et al. 2010) show some morphological similarity to Phytopythium. However, their sporangia are in average two or more times the size of sporangia in the Phytopythium species (length av. 64–117 μm, resp. 20–40 μm). They develop zoospores inside the sporangium and not in a vesicle like Pythium, though the formation of a vesicle may be part of the release process. Moreover, no internal proliferation was observed in these species. Halophytophthora kandeliae was previously transferred to Phytopythium (Marano et al. 2014, Thines 2014). The strains of Halophytophthora kandeliae used in barcode analyses of ITS and COI regions were CBS 111.91 and CBS 113.91 and they were both found to be associated with the Phytopythium clade (Robideau et al. 2011). However, neither of these strains is the type strain of this species. Marano et al. (2014) have published the ITS sequence of the type strain of H. kandeliae from ATCC and this sequence was identical to that of CBS 111.91 and 113.91. We have then included data from strain CBS 113.91 in our analyses here and are certain that it well represents the systematic placement of Phytopythium kandeliae. There are some difficulties with Halophytophthora operculata’s lack of fit in this clade by morphological measures and we have decided not to rename it at this time. This marine species has zoospore development fully within the sporangium; no vesicle occurs. Zoospore discharge is unique, via an operculum at the apex of the sporangium and no internal proliferation was observed. The size of the sporangia is significantly much larger than those of the Phytopythium species (up to 175 um). The strain CBS 241.83, which is the ex-type strain of H. operculata, did not sporulate during our investigations, so the identity of the strain could not be confirmed. However the current molecular data available about this strain, the sequence data presented here and the organisation of the 5S gene family as reported by Bedard et al. (2006), does indicate that it belongs in a monophyletic circumscription of Phytopythium. More investigation of this species is clearly required in order to confirm its identity.New combinations were deposited in MycoBank (see below in section Taxonomic and Nomenclatural Changes; Crous et al. 2004).
CONCLUSIONS
The genus Phytopythium was first proposed to the community in 2008 (see www.phytophthoradb.org/pdf/O8LevesquePM.pdf) and it was formally published in June 2010 (Bala et al. 2010b), with Phytopythium sindhum as the type species. In 2010, Uzuhashi et al. (2010) proposed another name Ovatisporangium for clade K using a partial sampling of Pythium and Phytophthora species and published their findings in September of 2010. Comparison of their circumscription of the genus Ovatisporangium to our molecular analyses clearly shows that the type of Phytopythium, P. sindhum is a member of the group described as Ovatisporangium (Fig. 1, 2). Ovatisporangium is thus recognised as a synonym of Phytopythium.We demonstrated with three different phylogenetic markers that all species belonging to Pythium clade K represent a monophyletic genus that includes the type species of the previously described genus Phytopythium. The taxonomic circumscription of other Pythium clades remains unresolved. The species with filamentous and globose sporangia are well separated as reported before in many studies, however, both LSU and COI suggest that clades A–J could be divided into subgroups but provide no support for any particular arrangement. The inclusion of species from other genera closely related to Pythium such as Pythiogeton, Lagenidium or Myzocytiopsis can change these conclusions but clade support remains very low (Schroeder et al. 2013, Hyde et al. 2014). Therefore, we recommend avoiding any further changes in the generic status of Pythium Pringsheim species belonging to clade A–J until better phylogenetic markers are found and multigene phylogenies are available with the closely related genera.
TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES
Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, Persoonia 24: 137. 2010Type species. Phytopythium sindhum, Lodhi, Shahzad & Lévesque, Persoonia 24: 137. 2010.Etymology. Named after combined features of the genera Phytophthora and Pythium.Common morphological characteristics of the species of Phytopythium are globose to ovoid shape of sporangia, often with a more or less distinct papilla or non-papillate and often proliferating internally like those in Phytophthora with non-papillate sporangia. Zoospore discharge is like Pythium. Most species have large, smooth oogonia, thick-walled oospores, and 1–2 elongate or lobate antheridia, laterally applied to the oogonium. Cultures are mostly homothallic, occasionally sterile.Notes — Phytopythium (Bala et al. 2010b) is emended to include species of Pythium in clade K from Lévesque & de Cock (2004) and described after that. It is morphologically and phylogenetically between Pythium and Phytophthora.
NEW COMBINATIONS
(R.L. Duan) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563326Basionym. Pythium boreale R.L. Duan, Acta Mycol. Sin. 4: 1. 1985 (as ‘borealis’) (MB105742).≡ Ovatisporangium boreale (R.L. Duan) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517560).Representative strain — CHINA, soil under Brassica caulorapa, CBS 551.88 (ex-type strain not available).(B. Paul) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563328Basionym. Pythium carbonicum B. Paul, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 219: 270. 2003 (MB489329).≡ Ovatisporangium carbonicum (B. Paul) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517561).Representative strain — FRANCE, soil on top of spoil heap, CBS 112544 (ex-type strain).(Sideris) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563329Basionym. Pythium chamaehyphon Sideris, C.P, Mycologia 24: 33. 1932 (as ‘chamaihyphon’) (MB260414).≡ Ovatisporangium chamaehyphon (Sideris) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517562).Representative strain — USA, Hawaii, Carica papaya, CBS 259.30 (ex-type strain).(B. Paul) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563330Basionym. Pythium citrinum B. Paul, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 234: 273. 2004 (MB368597).≡ Ovatisporangium citrinum (B. Paul) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517563).Representative strain — FRANCE, Marsaunay la cote, vinyeard soil, CBS 119171 (ex-type strain).(Broders, P. E. Lipps, M L. Ellis & Dorrance) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB807542Basionym. Pythium delawarense Broders, P.E. Lipps, M.L. Ellis & Dorrance, Mycologia 104: 789. 2012 (MB563353).Representative strain — USA, Ohio, Delaware county, Glycine max, CBS 123040 (ex-type strain).(Drechsler) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563332Basionym. Pythium helicoides Drechsler, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 20: 413. 1930 (MB266912).≡ Ovatisporangium helicoides (Drechsler) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517559).= Phytophthora fagopyri S. Takim. ex S. Ito & Tokun., Trans. Sapporo Nat. Hist. Soc. 14: 15. 1935 (MB472184).Representative strain — USA, Phaseolus vulgaris, CBS 286.31 (authentic strain).(Nechw.) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563335Basionym. Pythium litorale Nechw., FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 255: 99. 2006 (MB521454).≡ Ovatisporangium litorale (Nechw.) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517566).Representative strain — GERMANY, Lake Konstanz, rhizosphere soil (Phragmites australis), CBS 118360 (ex-type strain).(Belbahri, B. Paul & Lefort) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563337Basionym. Pythium mercuriale Belbahri, B. Paul & Lefort, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 284: 20. 2008 (MB511433).≡ Ovatisporangium mercuriale (Belbahri, B. Paul & Lefort) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517568).Representative strain — SOUTH AFRICA, Limpopo Province, ex rhizosphere Macadamiae integrifoliae, CBS 122443 (ex-type strain).(Nechw ) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563338Basionym. Pythium montanum Nechw., Mycol. Progr. 2: 79. 2003 (MB373239).≡ Ovatisporangium montanum (Nechw.) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517569).Representative strain — GERMANY, Bavarian Alps, wet soil under Picea abies, CBS 111349 (ex-type strain).(Drechsler) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563339Basionym. Pythium oedochilum Drechsler, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 20: 414. 1931 (MB272763).≡ Ovatisporangium oedochilum (Drechsler) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (as ‘oedichilum’) (MB517570).Representative strain — USA, CBS 292.37 (authentic strain).(Drechsler) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563340Basionym. Pythium ostracodes Drechsler, Phytopathology 33: 286. 1943 (MB290364).≡ Ovatisporangium ostracodes (Drechsler) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517571).Representative strain — SPAIN, clay soil, CBS 768.73 (strain used by van der Plaats-Niterink (1981), ex-type strain not available).(Drechsler) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB807543Basionym. Pythium palingenes Drechsler, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 20: 416. 1930 (MB273284).Representative strain — None available.(Drechsler) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB807544Basionym. Pythium polytylum Drechsler, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 20: 415. 1930 (MB275012).Representative strain — None available.(de Bary) Abad, De Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB563322Basionym. Pythium vexans de Bary, J. R. Agric. Soc. 12 (Ser. 2,1): 255. 1876 (MB174427).≡ Ovatisporangium vexans (de Bary) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish., Mycoscience 51: 360. 2010 (MB517573).= Pythium complectens M. Braun, J. Agric. Res. 29: 415. 1924 (MB261556).= Pythium allantocladon Sideris, Mycologia 24: 27. 1932 (MB256394).= Pythium ascophallon Sideris, Mycologia 24: 29. 1932 (MB257476).= Pythium polycladon Sideris, Mycologia 24: 32. 1932 (MB274913).= Pythium euthyhyphon Sideris, Mycologia 24: 34. 1932 (MB536649).= Pythiumpiperinum Dastur, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B 1, 11: 803. 1935 (MB274563).Representative strain — IRAN, soil, CBS 119.80 (strain used by van der Plaats-Niterink (1981) ex-type strain not available).
Phytopythium mirpurense sp. nov. sporangia (a–g) and gametangia (h–o). a–b. Papillate sporangia; c. sporangium proliferation outside of empty sporangium; d. internally proliferating sporangium; e. early stage of vesicle formation; f. vesicle with zoospore development inside; g. empty sporangium with remnants of vesicle membrane still attached; h. oogonium on short lateral stalk; i. unilaterally intercalary oogonium; j–o. oogonia with aplerotic oospores and long, cylindrical antheria. Arrows indicate constrictions in antheridia. — Scale bar in all figures 10 μm, except panel d (20 μm).
Etymology. Name refers to the District MirpurKhas of Sindh province, Pakistan from where this species was frequently isolated.Main hyphae up to 6 μm wide. Sporangia papillate, proliferating, subglobose, limoniform, obovoid or ovoid 20–25 μm diam. Discharge tube short 5–8 × 5–6 μm diam. Oogonia large smooth globose, terminal, intercalary, occasionally unilaterally intercalary, (27-)34–37(-40) (av. 34) μm diam. Antheridia 1–3 per oogonium, mostly monoclinous or distantly monoclinous, occasionally diclinous. Oogonia and antheridial stalk originate from same hyphae. Antheridia apply lengthwise to the oogonium producing lateral or occasionally apical fertilisation tubes. Oospores aplerotic or nearly plerotic (22-)29–32(-34) (av. 29.45) μm diam. Oospore wall thickness is 2.5–3 (av. 2.8) μm. Ooplast 13–16 μm diam (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). Aplerotic index 66.7 %, ooplast index 23 % and wall index 47 %.Colony characteristics — Phytopythium mirpurense produces profuse white cottony growth on PDA and CMDA, on PCA submerged without any patterns, and on CMA with a rosette pattern. The optimum growth occurred at 30 °C. Daily growth at 25 °C on PDA 19 mm, PCA 20 mm, CMA 23.5 mm and CMAD 26 mm. The maximum growth temperature was 35 °C.Material examined. PAKISTAN, Sindh, District MirpurKhas, MirWah, N25°23’ E69°02’, stagnant water, 12 Jan. 2006, A.M. Lodhi (holotype CBS 124523, maintained in inactive state. Culture ex-type also deposited as DAOM 238991 in CCFC).Additional material examined. PAKISTAN, Sindh, from water pond at Sindhri, District MirpurKhas (DAOM 238992, CBS124524) (N25°37’ E69°12’).
Authors: Conrad L Schoch; Keith A Seifert; Sabine Huhndorf; Vincent Robert; John L Spouge; C André Levesque; Wen Chen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gregg P Robideau; Arthur W A M De Cock; Michael D Coffey; Hermann Voglmayr; Henk Brouwer; Kanak Bala; David W Chitty; Nicole Désaulniers; Quinn A Eggertson; Claire M M Gachon; Chia-Hui Hu; Frithjof C Küpper; Tara L Rintoul; Ehab Sarhan; Els C P Verstappen; Yonghong Zhang; Peter J M Bonants; Jean B Ristaino; C André Lévesque Journal: Mol Ecol Resour Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 7.090
Authors: T Jung; B Scanu; J Bakonyi; D Seress; G M Kovács; A Durán; E Sanfuentes von Stowasser; L Schena; S Mosca; P Q Thu; C M Nguyen; S Fajardo; M González; A Pérez-Sierra; H Rees; A Cravador; C Maia; M Horta Jung Journal: Persoonia Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 11.051