Literature DB >> 26239985

U.S.-Based National Sentinel Surveillance Study for the Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrheal Isolates and Their Susceptibility to Fidaxomicin.

D R Snydman1, L A McDermott2, N V Jacobus2, C Thorpe3, S Stone2, S G Jenkins4, E J C Goldstein5, R Patel6, B A Forbes7, S Mirrett8, S Johnson9, D N Gerding9.   

Abstract

In 2011 a surveillance study for the susceptibility to fidaxomicin and epidemiology of Clostridium difficile isolates in the United States was undertaken in seven geographically dispersed medical centers. This report encompasses baseline surveillance in 2011 and 2012 on 925 isolates. A convenience sample of C. difficile isolates or toxin positive stools from patients were referred to a central laboratory. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by agar dilution (CLSI M11-A8). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Food and Drug Administration, or European Union of Clinical Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints were applied where applicable. Toxin gene profiles were characterized by multiplex PCR on each isolate. A random sample of 322 strains, stratified by institution, underwent restriction endonuclease analysis (REA). The fidaxomicin MIC90 was 0.5 μg/ml for all isolates regardless of REA type or toxin gene profile, and all isolates were inhibited at ≤1.0 μg/ml. By REA typing, BI strains represented 25.5% of the isolates. The toxin gene profile of tcdA, tcdB, and cdtA/B positive with a tcdC 18-bp deletion correlated with BI REA group. Moxifloxacin and clindamycin resistance was increased among either BI or binary toxin-positive isolates. Metronidazole and vancomycin showed reduced susceptibility (EUCAST criteria) in these isolates. Geographic variations in susceptibility, REA group and binary toxin gene presence were observed. Fidaxomicin activity against C. difficile isolated in a national surveillance study did not change more than 1 year after licensure. This analysis provides baseline results for future comparisons.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26239985      PMCID: PMC4576112          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00845-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  28 in total

1.  International typing study of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Carl E Manzo; Michelle M Merrigan; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding; Thomas V Riley; Joseph Silva; Jon S Brazier
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  Strain types and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Clostridium difficile isolates from the United States, 2011 to 2013.

Authors:  Isabella A Tickler; Richard V Goering; Joseph D Whitmore; Ashley N W Lynn; David H Persing; Fred C Tenover
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pan-European longitudinal surveillance of antibiotic resistance among prevalent Clostridium difficile ribotypes.

Authors:  J Freeman; J Vernon; K Morris; S Nicholson; S Todhunter; C Longshaw; M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Definition of the single integration site of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  V Braun; T Hundsberger; P Leukel; M Sauerborn; C von Eichel-Streiber
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1996-11-28       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  New multiplex PCR method for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A (tcdA) and toxin B (tcdB) and the binary toxin (cdtA/cdtB) genes applied to a Danish strain collection.

Authors:  S Persson; M Torpdahl; K E P Olsen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Emergence of reduced susceptibility to metronidazole in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Simon D Baines; Rachael O'Connor; Jane Freeman; Warren N Fawley; Celine Harmanus; Paola Mastrantonio; Ed J Kuijper; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Clostridium difficile infections in a Canadian tertiary care hospital before and during a regional epidemic associated with the BI/NAP1/027 strain.

Authors:  Annie-Claude Labbé; Louise Poirier; Duncan Maccannell; Thomas Louie; Michel Savoie; Claire Béliveau; Michel Laverdière; Jacques Pépin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparison of seven techniques for typing international epidemic strains of Clostridium difficile: restriction endonuclease analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PCR-ribotyping, multilocus sequence typing, multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and surface layer protein A gene sequence typing.

Authors:  George Killgore; Angela Thompson; Stuart Johnson; Jon Brazier; Ed Kuijper; Jacques Pepin; Eric H Frost; Paul Savelkoul; Brad Nicholson; Renate J van den Berg; Haru Kato; Susan P Sambol; Walter Zukowski; Christopher Woods; Brandi Limbago; Dale N Gerding; L Clifford McDonald
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  In vitro activities of 15 antimicrobial agents against 110 toxigenic clostridium difficile clinical isolates collected from 1983 to 2004.

Authors:  David W Hecht; Minerva A Galang; Susan P Sambol; James R Osmolski; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Binary toxin production in Clostridium difficile is regulated by CdtR, a LytTR family response regulator.

Authors:  Glen P Carter; Dena Lyras; David L Allen; Kate E Mackin; Pauline M Howarth; Jennifer R O'Connor; Julian I Rood
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Update on Antimicrobial Resistance in Clostridium difficile: Resistance Mechanisms and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Zhong Peng; Dazhi Jin; Hyeun Bum Kim; Charles W Stratton; Bin Wu; Yi-Wei Tang; Xingmin Sun
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Constitutive expression of the cryptic vanGCd operon promotes vancomycin resistance in Clostridioides difficile clinical isolates.

Authors:  Wan-Jou Shen; Aditi Deshpande; Kirk E Hevener; Bradley T Endres; Kevin W Garey; Kelli L Palmer; Julian G Hurdle
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Differences in the Molecular Epidemiology and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile Isolates in Pediatric and Adult Patients.

Authors:  Larry K Kociolek; Dale N Gerding; James R Osmolski; Sameer J Patel; David R Snydman; Laura A McDermott; David W Hecht
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Chemical Genomics, Structure Elucidation, and in Vivo Studies of the Marine-Derived Anticlostridial Ecteinamycin.

Authors:  Thomas P Wyche; René F Ramos Alvarenga; Jeff S Piotrowski; Megan N Duster; Simone R Warrack; Gabriel Cornilescu; Travis J De Wolfe; Yanpeng Hou; Doug R Braun; Gregory A Ellis; Scott W Simpkins; Justin Nelson; Chad L Myers; James Steele; Hirotada Mori; Nasia Safdar; John L Markley; Scott R Rajski; Tim S Bugni
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.100

5.  U.S.-Based National Surveillance for Fidaxomicin Susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrheal Isolates from 2013 to 2016.

Authors:  C M Thorpe; L A McDermott; M K Tran; J Chang; S G Jenkins; E J C Goldstein; R Patel; B A Forbes; S Johnson; D N Gerding; D R Snydman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Probiotics as adjunctive therapy for preventing Clostridium difficile infection - What are we waiting for?

Authors:  Jennifer K Spinler; Caná L Ross; Tor C Savidge
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.331

7.  Evaluation of the In Vitro Activity of Eravacycline against a Broad Spectrum of Recent Clinical Anaerobic Isolates.

Authors:  David R Snydman; Laura A McDermott; Nilda V Jacobus; Kathryn Kerstein; Trudy H Grossman; Joyce A Sutcliffe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Simultaneous detection and characterization of toxigenic Clostridium difficile directly from clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Hanjiang Lai; Chen Huang; Jian Cai; Julian Ye; Jun She; Yi Zheng; Liqian Wang; Yelin Wei; Weijia Fang; Xianjun Wang; Yi-Wei Tang; Yun Luo; Dazhi Jin
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Improving Outcomes in Patients Receiving Dialysis: The Peer Kidney Care Initiative.

Authors:  James B Wetmore; David T Gilbertson; Jiannong Liu; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Next-Generation Probiotics Targeting Clostridium difficile through Precursor-Directed Antimicrobial Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Jennifer K Spinler; Jennifer Auchtung; Aaron Brown; Prapaporn Boonma; Numan Oezguen; Caná L Ross; Ruth Ann Luna; Jessica Runge; James Versalovic; Alex Peniche; Sara M Dann; Robert A Britton; Anthony Haag; Tor C Savidge
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.