Raphaël Chouteau1,2, Benoit Combès2, Elise Bannier2,3, Haykel Snoussi2, Jean-Christophe Ferré2,3, Christian Barillot2, Gilles Edan1,2,4, Paul Sauleau5,6, Anne Kerbrat7,8. 1. Neurology Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France. 2. Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, CNRS, Inria, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, VISAGES (Vision, Action Et Gestion Des Informations en santé), ERL U 1228, 35000, Rennes, France. 3. Radiology Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France. 4. Plurithematic Clinical Investigation Center (CIC-P 1414), INSERM, Rennes, France. 5. Neurophysiology Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France. 6. Behavior and Basal Ganglia Research Unit (EA4712), Rennes 1 University, Rennes, France. 7. Neurology Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France. anne.kerbrat@chu-rennes.fr. 8. Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, CNRS, Inria, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, VISAGES (Vision, Action Et Gestion Des Informations en santé), ERL U 1228, 35000, Rennes, France. anne.kerbrat@chu-rennes.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with MS, the effect of structural damage to the corticospinal tract (CST) has been separately evaluated in the brain and spinal cord (SC), even though a cumulative impact is suspected. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CST damages on both the cortex and cervical SC, and examine their relative associations with motor function, measured both clinically and by electrophysiology. METHODS: We included 43 patients with early relapsing-remitting MS. Lesions were manually segmented on SC (axial T2*) and brain (3D FLAIR) scans. The CST was automatically segmented using an atlas (SC) or tractography (brain). Lesion volume fractions and diffusion parameters were calculated for SC, brain and CST. Central motor conduction time (CMCT) and triple stimulation technique amplitude ratio were measured for 42 upper limbs, from 22 patients. RESULTS: Mean lesion volume fractions were 5.2% in the SC portion of the CST and 0.9% in the brain portion. We did not find a significant correlation between brain and SC lesion volume fraction (r = 0.06, p = 0.68). The pyramidal EDSS score and CMCT were both significantly correlated with the lesion fraction in the SC CST (r = 0.39, p = 0.01 and r = 0.33, p = 0.03), but not in the brain CST. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the major contribution of SC lesions to CST damage and motor function abnormalities.
BACKGROUND: In patients with MS, the effect of structural damage to the corticospinal tract (CST) has been separately evaluated in the brain and spinal cord (SC), even though a cumulative impact is suspected. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CST damages on both the cortex and cervical SC, and examine their relative associations with motor function, measured both clinically and by electrophysiology. METHODS: We included 43 patients with early relapsing-remitting MS. Lesions were manually segmented on SC (axial T2*) and brain (3D FLAIR) scans. The CST was automatically segmented using an atlas (SC) or tractography (brain). Lesion volume fractions and diffusion parameters were calculated for SC, brain and CST. Central motor conduction time (CMCT) and triple stimulation technique amplitude ratio were measured for 42 upper limbs, from 22 patients. RESULTS: Mean lesion volume fractions were 5.2% in the SC portion of the CST and 0.9% in the brain portion. We did not find a significant correlation between brain and SC lesion volume fraction (r = 0.06, p = 0.68). The pyramidal EDSS score and CMCT were both significantly correlated with the lesion fraction in the SC CST (r = 0.39, p = 0.01 and r = 0.33, p = 0.03), but not in the brain CST. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the major contribution of SC lesions to CST damage and motor function abnormalities.
Authors: A Rico; B Audoin; J Franques; A Eusebio; F Reuter; I Malikova; A Ali Cherif; J Pouget; J Pelletier; S Attarian Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2009-01-19 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Kathleen M Zackowski; Seth A Smith; Daniel S Reich; Eliza Gordon-Lipkin; BettyAnn A Chodkowski; Divya R Sambandan; Michael Shteyman; Amy J Bastian; Peter C van Zijl; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Brain Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Robert T Naismith; Junqian Xu; Eric C Klawiter; Samantha Lancia; Nhial T Tutlam; Joanne M Wagner; Peiqing Qian; Kathryn Trinkaus; Sheng-Kwei Song; Anne H Cross Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 10.422