Literature DB >> 26239407

Breeding patterns and cultivated beets origins by genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium analyses.

Brigitte Mangin1,2,3, Florian Sandron3, Karine Henry4, Brigitte Devaux4, Glenda Willems5, Pierre Devaux4, Ellen Goudemand6.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Genetic diversity in worldwide population of beets is strongly affected by the domestication history, and the comparison of linkage disequilibrium in worldwide and elite populations highlights strong selection pressure. Genetic relationships and linkage disequilibrium (LD) were evaluated in a set of 2035 worldwide beet accessions and in another of 1338 elite sugar beet lines, using 320 and 769 single nucleotide polymorphisms, respectively. The structures of the populations were analyzed using four different approaches. Within the worldwide population, three of the methods gave a very coherent picture of the population structure. Fodder beet and sugar beet accessions were grouped together, separated from garden beets and sea beets, reflecting well the origins of beet domestication. The structure of the elite panel, however, was less stable between clustering methods, which was probably because of the high level of genetic mixing in breeding programs. For the linkage disequilibrium analysis, the usual measure (r (2)) was used, and compared with others that correct for population structure and relatedness (r S (2) , r V (2) , r VS (2)). The LD as measured by r (2) persisted beyond 10 cM within the elite panel and fell below 0.1 after less than 2 cM in the worldwide population, for almost all chromosomes. With correction for relatedness, LD decreased under 0.1 by 1 cM for almost all chromosomes in both populations, except for chromosomes 3 and 9 within the elite panel. In these regions, the larger extent of LD could be explained by strong selection pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26239407     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2582-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  26 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants.

Authors:  Sherry A Flint-Garcia; Jeffry M Thornsberry; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 3.  Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize.

Authors:  Jianming Yu; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices.

Authors:  M E J Newman
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-09-11

5.  Recombination and linkage disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Sung Kim; Vincent Plagnol; Tina T Hu; Christopher Toomajian; Richard M Clark; Stephan Ossowski; Joseph R Ecker; Detlef Weigel; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Variances and covariances of squared linkage disequilibria in finite populations.

Authors:  W G Hill; B S Weir
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Effect of population structure corrections on the results of association mapping tests in complex maize diversity panels.

Authors:  Sofiane Mezmouk; Pierre Dubreuil; Mickaël Bosio; Laurent Décousset; Alain Charcosset; Sébastien Praud; Brigitte Mangin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 9.  Progress towards the understanding and control of sugar beet rhizomania disease.

Authors:  Graham R D McGrann; Michael K Grimmer; Effie S Mutasa-Göttgens; Mark Stevens
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.663

10.  Population structure and eigenanalysis.

Authors:  Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price; David Reich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

1.  Insights into the genetic relationships among plants of Beta section Beta using SNP markers.

Authors:  Marco Andrello; Karine Henry; Pierre Devaux; Daphné Verdelet; Bruno Desprez; Stéphanie Manel
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genetic and phenotypic assessment of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris) elite inbred lines selected in Japan during the past 50 years.

Authors:  Kazunori Taguchi; Yosuke Kuroda; Kazuyuki Okazaki; Masanori Yamasaki
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Independent Validation of Genomic Prediction in Strawberry Over Multiple Cycles.

Authors:  Luis F Osorio; Salvador A Gezan; Sujeet Verma; Vance M Whitaker
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris chromosome 8 shows significant association with geosmin concentration in table beet.

Authors:  Solveig J Hanson; Julie C Dawson; Irwin L Goldman
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.154

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.