Literature DB >> 26237766

Association between tumor size and Breslow's thickness in malignant melanoma: a cross-sectional, multicenter study.

David Moreno-Ramírez1, Teresa Ojeda-Vila, Juan J Ríos-Martín, Adoración Nieto-García, Lara Ferrándiz.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the potential role of tumor diameter in explaining variations in tumoral invasion and in the initial prognosis for patients with malignant melanoma (MM). This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study that recruited between 2000 and 2009 patients with primary in-situ MM (Tis) and invasive cutaneous MM. Tis and MMs with a Breslow's thickness less than 1 mm (T1) were grouped (Tis-T1) and tumors with a Breslow's thickness 1 mm or more were also analyzed in combination (T2-T4). The tumor size was measured after routine formalin tissue fixation. Primary outcomes were the correlation between Breslow's thickness and tumor size, and the role of tumor size in explaining variations in Breslow's thickness, as assessed by the Pearson correlation test and logistic binary regression with calculation of the odds ratios. A total of 1610 MM patients were included and analyzed. The Pearson correlation between tumor size and Breslow's thickness was 0.42, with a determination coefficient of R2=0.18 (P>0.01). Correlations between tumor size and thickness were stronger in patients aged 30-60 years (r=0.42, R2=0.1764, P<0.001) and in tumors arising on the upper limbs (r=0.55, R2=0.3025). The odds ratio of identifying a T2-T4 stage MM in patients with tumors larger than 1 cm in size was 2.76 (95% confidence interval 2.25-3.39, P<0.001). Even though a direct, positive, and strong association between tumoral size and Breslow's thickness might be expected in melanoma cases, the strength of this association has been moderate. Tumor size explains a low burden of the variation observed in the Breslow's thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26237766     DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  5 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of LKB1 promoter methylation in cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Weiming Zhang; Xiao Li; Guoxin Song; Dan Luo
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Prognostic significance of tumor size for primary invasive cutaneous melanoma: A population-based study, 2004-2016.

Authors:  Qiuying Ma; Huinan Suo; Li Zhu; Yue Qian; Xiaoyan Sun; Jun Xie; Qianru Li; Yangxue Fu; Jun Li; Juan Tao
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Impact of clinical and personal data in the dermoscopic differentiation between early melanoma and atypical nevi.

Authors:  Linda Tognetti; Elisa Cinotti; Elvira Moscarella; Francesca Farnetani; Josep Malvehy; Aimilios Lallas; Giovanni Pellacani; Giuseppe Argenziano; Gabriele Cevenini; Pietro Rubegni
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-10-31

4.  Protocol for the Histologic Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus Statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) for the National Cutaneous Melanoma Registry.

Authors:  A Tejera-Vaquerizo; M T Fernández-Figueras; A Santos-Briz; J J Ríos-Martín; C Monteagudo; A Fernández-Flores; C Requena; V Traves; M A Descalzo-Gallego; J L Rodríguez-Peralto
Journal:  Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed)       Date:  2020-10-07

5.  The frequency and clinicopathological significance of NRAS mutations in primary cutaneous nodular melanoma in Indonesia.

Authors:  Hanggoro Tri Rinonce; Deflen Jumatul Sastri; Fita Trisnawati; Bidari Kameswari; Paranita Ferronika
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-06-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.