BACKGROUND: The use of electronic interventions (e-interventions) may improve treatment of alcohol misuse. PURPOSE: To characterize treatment intensity and systematically review the evidence for efficacy of e-interventions, relative to controls, for reducing alcohol consumption and alcohol-related impairment in adults and college students. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (via PubMed) from January 2000 to March 2015 and the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PsycINFO from January 2000 to August 2014. STUDY SELECTION: English-language, randomized, controlled trials that involved at least 50 adults who misused alcohol; compared an e-intervention group with a control group; and reported outcomes at 6 months or longer. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers abstracted data and independently rated trial quality and strength of evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS: In 28 unique trials, the modal e-intervention was brief feedback on alcohol consumption. Available data suggested a small reduction in consumption (approximately 1 drink per week) in adults and college students at 6 months but not at 12 months. There was no statistically significant effect on meeting drinking limit guidelines in adults or on binge-drinking episodes or social consequences of alcohol in college students. LIMITATIONS: E-interventions that ranged in intensity were combined in analyses. Quantitative results do not apply to short-term outcomes or alcohol use disorders. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that low-intensity e-inter ventions produce small reductions in alcohol consumption at 6 months, but there is little evidence for longer-term, clinically significant effects, such as meeting drinking limits. Future e-interventions could provide more intensive treatment and possibly human support to assist persons in meeting recommended drinking limits. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
BACKGROUND: The use of electronic interventions (e-interventions) may improve treatment of alcohol misuse. PURPOSE: To characterize treatment intensity and systematically review the evidence for efficacy of e-interventions, relative to controls, for reducing alcohol consumption and alcohol-related impairment in adults and college students. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (via PubMed) from January 2000 to March 2015 and the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PsycINFO from January 2000 to August 2014. STUDY SELECTION: English-language, randomized, controlled trials that involved at least 50 adults who misused alcohol; compared an e-intervention group with a control group; and reported outcomes at 6 months or longer. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers abstracted data and independently rated trial quality and strength of evidence. DATA SYNTHESIS: In 28 unique trials, the modal e-intervention was brief feedback on alcohol consumption. Available data suggested a small reduction in consumption (approximately 1 drink per week) in adults and college students at 6 months but not at 12 months. There was no statistically significant effect on meeting drinking limit guidelines in adults or on binge-drinking episodes or social consequences of alcohol in college students. LIMITATIONS: E-interventions that ranged in intensity were combined in analyses. Quantitative results do not apply to short-term outcomes or alcohol use disorders. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that low-intensity e-inter ventions produce small reductions in alcohol consumption at 6 months, but there is little evidence for longer-term, clinically significant effects, such as meeting drinking limits. Future e-interventions could provide more intensive treatment and possibly human support to assist persons in meeting recommended drinking limits. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Authors: Carmen V Voogt; Evelien A P Poelen; Marloes Kleinjan; Lex A C J Lemmers; Rutger C M E Engels Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Michael A Cucciare; Kenneth R Weingardt; Sharfun Ghaus; Matthew T Boden; Susan M Frayne Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Tim Neumann; Bruno Neuner; Edith Weiss-Gerlach; Hanne Tønnesen; Larry M Gentilello; Klaus-D Wernecke; Katrin Schmidt; Torsten Schröder; Helmar Wauer; Andreas Heinz; Karl Mann; Joachim M Müller; Norbert Haas; Wolfgang J Kox; Claudia D Spies Journal: J Trauma Date: 2006-10
Authors: Christopher J Monahan; Meghan E McDevitt-Murphy; Ashley A Dennhardt; Jessica R Skidmore; Matthew P Martens; James G Murphy Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Joseph E Glass; James R McKay; David H Gustafson; Rachel Kornfield; Paul J Rathouz; Fiona M McTavish; Amy K Atwood; Andrew Isham; Andrew Quanbeck; Dhavan Shah Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2017-03-30
Authors: Brian D Kiluk; Kathleen A Devore; Matthew B Buck; Charla Nich; Tami L Frankforter; Donna M LaPaglia; Brian T Yates; Melissa A Gordon; Kathleen M Carroll Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Kristin A Tansil; Marissa B Esser; Paramjit Sandhu; Jeffrey A Reynolds; Randy W Elder; Rebecca S Williamson; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Michele K Bohm; Robert D Brewer; Lela R McKnight-Eily; Daniel W Hungerford; Traci L Toomey; Ralph W Hingson; Jonathan E Fielding Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Anna E Jaffe; Jessica A Blayney; Scott Graupensperger; Cynthia A Stappenbeck; Michele Bedard-Gilligan; Mary Larimer Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2021-08-26
Authors: Benjamin H Han; Kristin Masukawa; David Rosenbloom; Alexis Kuerbis; Eric Helmuth; Diana H Liao; Alison A Moore Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2018-01-03
Authors: Gail L Rose; Gary J Badger; Joan M Skelly; Charles D MacLean; Tonya A Ferraro; John E Helzer Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 2.826