BACKGROUND: One-third of injured patients treated in the emergency department (ED) have an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Few are screened and receive counseling because ED staff have little time for additional tasks. We hypothesized that computer technology can screen and provide an intervention that reduces at-risk drinking (British Medical Association criteria) in injured ED patients. METHODS: In all, 3,026 subcritically injured patients admitted to an ED were screened for an AUD using a laptop computer that administered the AUD Identification Test (AUDIT) and assessed motivation to reduce drinking. Patients with a positive AUDIT (n = 1,139) were randomized to an intervention (n = 563) or control (n = 576) condition. The computer generated a customized printout based on the patient's own alcohol use pattern, level of motivation, and personal factors, which was provided in the form of feedback and advice. RESULTS: Most patients (85%) used the computer with minimal assistance. At study entry, a similar proportion in each group met criteria for at-risk drinking (49.6% versus 46.8%, p = 0.355). At 6 months, 21.7% of intervention and 30.4% of control patients met criteria for at-risk drinking (p = 0.008). Intervention patients also had a 35.7% decrease in alcohol intake, compared with a 20.5% decrease in controls (p = 0.006). At 12 months, alcohol intake decreased by 22.8% in the intervention group versus 10.9% in controls (p = 0.023), but the proportion of at-risk drinkers did not significantly differ (37.3% versus 42.6%, p = 0.168). CONCLUSIONS: The computer-generated intervention was associated with a significant decrease in alcohol use and at-risk drinking. Research is needed to further evaluate and adapt information technology to provide preventive clinical services in the ED.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: One-third of injured patients treated in the emergency department (ED) have an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Few are screened and receive counseling because ED staff have little time for additional tasks. We hypothesized that computer technology can screen and provide an intervention that reduces at-risk drinking (British Medical Association criteria) in injured ED patients. METHODS: In all, 3,026 subcritically injured patients admitted to an ED were screened for an AUD using a laptop computer that administered the AUD Identification Test (AUDIT) and assessed motivation to reduce drinking. Patients with a positive AUDIT (n = 1,139) were randomized to an intervention (n = 563) or control (n = 576) condition. The computer generated a customized printout based on the patient's own alcohol use pattern, level of motivation, and personal factors, which was provided in the form of feedback and advice. RESULTS: Most patients (85%) used the computer with minimal assistance. At study entry, a similar proportion in each group met criteria for at-risk drinking (49.6% versus 46.8%, p = 0.355). At 6 months, 21.7% of intervention and 30.4% of control patients met criteria for at-risk drinking (p = 0.008). Intervention patients also had a 35.7% decrease in alcohol intake, compared with a 20.5% decrease in controls (p = 0.006). At 12 months, alcohol intake decreased by 22.8% in the intervention group versus 10.9% in controls (p = 0.023), but the proportion of at-risk drinkers did not significantly differ (37.3% versus 42.6%, p = 0.168). CONCLUSIONS: The computer-generated intervention was associated with a significant decrease in alcohol use and at-risk drinking. Research is needed to further evaluate and adapt information technology to provide preventive clinical services in the ED.
Authors: Frederic C Blow; Maureen A Walton; Kristen L Barry; Regan L Murray; Rebecca M Cunningham; Lynn S Massey; Stephen T Chermack; Brenda M Booth Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2010-12-29 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Shahram Lotfipour; James Howard; Samer Roumani; Wirachin Hoonpongsimanont; Bharath Chakravarthy; Craig L Anderson; Jie W Weiss; Victor Cisneros; Brad Dykzeul Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2013-01-12 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Anne C Fernandez; Rebecca Waller; Maureen A Walton; Erin E Bonar; Rosalinda V Ignacio; Stephen T Chermack; Rebecca M Cunningham; Brenda M Booth; Mark A Ilgen; Kristen L Barry; Frederic C Blow Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Rebecca M Cunningham; Maureen A Walton; Abby Goldstein; Stephen T Chermack; Jean T Shope; C Raymond Bingham; Marc A Zimmerman; Frederic C Blow Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Federico E Vaca; James Dziura; Fuad Abujarad; Michael V Pantalon; Allen Hsiao; Craig A Field; Gail D'Onofrio Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Kerry B Broderick; Megan L Ranney; Federico E Vaca; Gail D'Onofrio; Richard E Rothman; Karin V Rhodes; Bruce Becker; Jason S Haukoos Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Tamara M Haegerich; Linda L Dahlberg; Thomas R Simon; Grant T Baldwin; David A Sleet; Arlene I Greenspan; Linda C Degutis Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 79.321