Literature DB >> 26236843

Separating the role of biotic interactions and climate in determining adaptive response of plants to climate change.

Sara Tomiolo, Wim H Van der Putten, Katja Tielbörger.   

Abstract

Altered rainfall regimes will greatly affect the response of plant species to climate change. However, little is known about how direct effects of changing precipitation on plant performance may depend on other abiotic factors and biotic interactions. We used reciprocal transplants between climatically very different sites with simultaneous manipulation of soil, plant population origin, and neighbor conditions to evaluate local adaptation and possible adaptive response of four Eastern Mediterranean annual plant species to climate change. The effect of site on plant performance was negligible, but soil origin had a strong effect on fecundity, most likely due to differential water retaining ability. Competition by neighbors strongly reduced fitness. We separated the effects of the abiotic and biotic soil properties on plant performance by repeating the field experiment in a greenhouse under homogenous environmental conditions and including a soil biota manipulation treatment. As in the field, plant performance differed among soil origins and neighbor treatments. Moreover, we found plant species-specific responses to soil biota that may be best explained by the differential sensitivity to negative and positive soil biota effects. Overall, under the conditions of our experiment with two contrasting sites, biotic interactions had a strong effect on plant fitness that interacted with and eventually overrode climate. Because climate and biotic interactions covary, reciprocal transplants and climate gradient studies should consider soil biotic interactions and abiotic conditions when evaluating climate change effects on plant performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26236843     DOI: 10.1890/14-1445.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  5 in total

1.  Specific adaptation to strong competitors can offset the negative effects of population size reductions.

Authors:  Xin-Feng Zhao; Angus Buckling; Quan-Guo Zhang; Elze Hesse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Drought mildly reduces plant dominance in a temperate prairie ecosystem across years.

Authors:  Karen Castillioni; Kevin Wilcox; Lifen Jiang; Yiqi Luo; Chang Gyo Jung; Lara Souza
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Adaptation to elevated CO2 in different biodiversity contexts.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Kleynhans; Sarah P Otto; Peter B Reich; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Intraspecific Trait Variation and Phenotypic Plasticity Mediate Alpine Plant Species Response to Climate Change.

Authors:  Jonathan J Henn; Vanessa Buzzard; Brian J Enquist; Aud H Halbritter; Kari Klanderud; Brian S Maitner; Sean T Michaletz; Christine Pötsch; Lorah Seltzer; Richard J Telford; Yan Yang; Li Zhang; Vigdis Vandvik
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  Small spaces, big impacts: contributions of micro-environmental variation to population persistence under climate change.

Authors:  Derek A Denney; M Inam Jameel; Jordan B Bemmels; Mia E Rochford; Jill T Anderson
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.276

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.