| Literature DB >> 26236740 |
Radwa A Mehanna1, Iman Nabil2, Noha Attia2, Amany A Bary3, Khalid A Razek4, Tamer A E Ahmed5, Fatma Elsayed6.
Abstract
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) represent a modern approach for management of chronic skin injuries. In this work, we describe BM-MSCs application versus their conditioned media (CM) when delivered topically admixed with fibrin glue to enhance the healing of chronic excisional wounds in rats. Fifty-two adult male rats were classified into four groups after induction of large-sized full-thickness skin wound: control group (CG), fibrin only group (FG), fibrin + MSCs group (FG + SCs), and fibrin + CM group (FG + CM). Healing wounds were evaluated functionally and microscopically. Eight days after injury, number of CD68+ macrophages infiltrating granulation tissue was considerably higher in the latter two groups. Although--later--none of the groups depicted a substantially different healing rate, the quality of regenerated skin was significantly boosted by the application of either BM-MSCs or their CM both (1) structurally as demonstrated by the obviously increased mean area percent of collagen fibers in Masson's trichrome-stained skin biopsies and (2) functionally as supported by the interestingly improved epidermal barrier as well as dermal tensile strength. Thus, we conclude that topically applied BM-MSCs and their CM-via fibrin vehicle--could effectively improve the quality of healed skin in chronic excisional wounds in rats, albeit without true acceleration of wound closure.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26236740 PMCID: PMC4508387 DOI: 10.1155/2015/846062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Morphological and phenotypic characteristics of BM-MSCs. The cells isolated from rat bone marrow exhibited spindle shaped fibroblast-like morphology. (a) Primary culture, passage zero (P0), (b) P1, (c) P2, and (d) P3. (Phase contrast microscope, scale bar = 100 µm.) (e) A representative flow cytometric analysis of cell-surface markers of BM-MSCs at P3. Cells were labeled with antibodies against MSC marker (CD44-PE) and hematopoietic antigen (CD45-FITC); M1 is the % of cells positive for both markers.
Figure 2Model of progression of wound healing over time and wound measurement. (a)–(f) The shown graduated instrument measured the wound length and width. (a) Day 0. (b) Day 7. (c) Day14. (d) Day 21. (e) Day 28. (f) Day 35 complete healing. (g) Line graph of wound healing progression over time. Vertical error bars represented the standard deviation of the reported mean values (n = 10).
Comparison between the different studied groups according to tensile strength, extension ratio, and healing duration.
| CG | FG | FG + SCs | FG + CM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength (Kg/mm2) | 0.015 ± 0.001 | 0.013 ± 0.003 | 0.023ab ± 0.007 | 0.020ab ± 0.002 | <0.001 |
| Extension ratio (mm) | 1.63 ± 0.21 | 1.65 ± 0.14 | 2.13ab ± 0.27 | 1.99ab ± 0.21 | <0.001 |
| Healing (days) | 36.90 ± 4.31 | 36.30 ± 4.06 | 34.40 ± 3.66 | 34.60 ± 4.03 | 0.426 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD (tensile strength and extension ratio: n = 7/group, healing: n = 10/group). One-way ANOVA was conducted and post hoc test for pair comparison. Results are significant at p < 0.001. CG: control group, FG: wound sprayed with fibrin glue, FG + SCs: wound sprayed with MSCs-loaded fibrin glue, and FG + CM: wound sprayed with fibrin glue dissolved in conditioned media. aSignificant with CG and bsignificant with FG.
Figure 3(a)–(d) Immunohistochemistry of granulation tissue 8 days after injury showing variable degrees of immunoreactivity in CD68+ macrophages (brown color). Each figure is a hematoxylin-counterstained representative section (Scale bar = 50 µm). (e) Macrophage count/HPF. (f)–(i) Photomicrographs of skin biopsies 35 days after injury depicting variable amounts and arrangement of collagen fibers in the dermis. Each figure is a Masson's trichrome-stained representative section (scale bar = 200 µm). (j) Histomorphometric quantification of mean collagen fraction. In (e) and (j) F-test (ANOVA) test was used to analyze data presented as mean ± SD; “∗” is significant versus CG and “#” is significant versus FG group [p < 0.001], while “°” is significant versus FG + CM [p < 0.05] (n = 3).
Figure 4Comparison between the different studied groups according to hydration (a) and TEWL (b). One-way ANOVA test was used to analyze the data presented as mean ± SD; “∗” is significant versus CG; “#” is significant versus FG group [p < 0.001] (n = 7).