Literature DB >> 26236091

Episodic Memory Does Not Add Up: Verbatim-Gist Superposition Predicts Violations of the Additive Law of Probability.

C J Brainerd1, Zheng Wang2, Valerie F Reyna1, K Nakamura1.   

Abstract

Fuzzy-trace theory's assumptions about memory representation are cognitive examples of the familiar superposition property of physical quantum systems. When those assumptions are implemented in a formal quantum model (QEMc), they predict that episodic memory will violate the additive law of probability: If memory is tested for a partition of an item's possible episodic states, the individual probabilities of remembering the item as belonging to each state must sum to more than 1. We detected this phenomenon using two standard designs, item false memory and source false memory. The quantum implementation of fuzzy-trace theory also predicts that violations of the additive law will vary in strength as a function of reliance on gist memory. That prediction, too, was confirmed via a series of manipulations (e.g., semantic relatedness, testing delay) that are thought to increase gist reliance. Surprisingly, an analysis of the underlying structure of violations of the additive law revealed that as a general rule, increases in remembering correct episodic states do not produce commensurate reductions in remembering incorrect states.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fuzzy-trace theory; gist memory; quantum probability; subadditivity; superposition

Year:  2015        PMID: 26236091      PMCID: PMC4517291          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  32 in total

1.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  AreYoung children susceptible to the false-memory illusion?

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; T J Forrest
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

3.  Overdistribution in source memory.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; R E Holliday; K Nakamura
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Developmentally invariant dissociations in children's true and false memories: not all relatedness is created equal.

Authors:  Mark L Howe
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

5.  Explaining developmental reversals in false memory.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-05

6.  A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-09-11

7.  An additive-utility model of delay discounting.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The two recollections.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; C F A Gomes; R Moran
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Tyler Solloway; Richard M Shiffrin; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Overdistribution illusions: Categorical judgments produce them, confidence ratings reduce them.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; K Nakamura; V F Reyna; R E Holliday
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-01

2.  Developmental reversals in false memory: Development is complementary, not compensatory.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; R E Holliday
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-08-02

3.  Complementarity in false memory illusions.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-11-20

4.  On the use of discrete-time quantum walks in decision theory.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Giuseppe M Ferro; Didier Sornette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.