Literature DB >> 24027203

A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction.

Zheng Wang1, Jerome R Busemeyer.   

Abstract

Question order effects are commonly observed in self-report measures of judgment and attitude. This article develops a quantum question order model (the QQ model) to account for four types of question order effects observed in literature. First, the postulates of the QQ model are presented. Second, an a priori, parameter-free, and precise prediction, called the QQ equality, is derived from these mathematical principles, and six empirical data sets are used to test the prediction. Third, a new index is derived from the model to measure similarity between questions. Fourth, we show that in contrast to the QQ model, Bayesian and Markov models do not generally satisfy the QQ equality and thus cannot account for the reported empirical data that support this equality. Finally, we describe the conditions under which order effects are predicted to occur, and we review a broader range of findings that are encompassed by these very same quantum principles. We conclude that quantum probability theory, initially invented to explain order effects on measurements in physics, appears to be a powerful natural explanation for order effects of self-report measures in social and behavioral sciences, too.
© 2013 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; Constructive; Judgment; Markov; Order effects; Quantum probability; Question order; Vector feature space

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24027203     DOI: 10.1111/tops.12040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  22 in total

1.  Paths of Cultural Systems.

Authors:  Paul Ballonoff
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 2.524

2.  Challenging the classical notion of time in cognition: a quantum perspective.

Authors:  James M Yearsley; Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  On contextuality in behavioural data.

Authors:  Ehtibar N Dzhafarov; Janne V Kujala; Víctor H Cervantes; Ru Zhang; Matt Jones
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Contextuality in canonical systems of random variables.

Authors:  Ehtibar N Dzhafarov; Víctor H Cervantes; Janne V Kujala
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.

Authors:  James M Yearsley; Jennifer S Trueblood
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

6.  Episodic Memory Does Not Add Up: Verbatim-Gist Superposition Predicts Violations of the Additive Law of Probability.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; Zheng Wang; Valerie F Reyna; K Nakamura
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Tyler Solloway; Richard M Shiffrin; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Quantum probability theory as a common framework for reasoning and similarity.

Authors:  Jennifer S Trueblood; Emmanuel M Pothos; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-11

9.  Quantum-like model of unconscious-conscious dynamics.

Authors:  Andrei Khrennikov
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-03

10.  In search for a standard of rationality.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.