Literature DB >> 26235706

Bias and imprecision in analysis of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction data.

Joel Tellinghuisen1,2, Andrej-Nikolai Spiess1,2.   

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulations are used to examine the bias and loss of precision that result from experimental error and analysis procedures in real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the limit of small copy numbers (N0), Poisson statistics govern the dispersion in estimates of the quantification cycle (Cq) for replicate experiments, permitting the estimation of N0 from the Cq variance, which is inversely proportional to N0. We derive corrections to expressions given previously for this determination. With increasing N0, the Poisson contribution decreases and other effects, like pipet volume uncertainty (typically >3%), dominate. Cycle-to-cycle variability in the amplification efficiency E produces scale dispersion similar to that for variability in the sensitivity of fluorescence detection. When this E variability is proportional to just the amplification (E - 1), there is insignificant effect on Cq if scale-independent definitions are used for this marker. Single-reaction analysis methods based on the exponential growth equation are inherently low-biased in E and high-biased in N0, and these biases can amount to factor-of-4 or greater error in N0. For estimating Cq, their greatest limitation is use of a constant absolute threshold, making them inefficient for data that exhibit scale variability.

Year:  2015        PMID: 26235706     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  10 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for Group Testing: A Practical Approach for the Clinical Laboratory.

Authors:  Jun G Tan; Aznan Omar; Wendy By Lee; Moh S Wong
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-12

2.  Accuracy of real-time PCR and digital PCR for the monitoring of total HIV DNA under prolonged antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Constance Renault; Karine Bolloré; Amandine Pisoni; Camille Motto-Ros; Philippe Van de Perre; Jacques Reynes; Edouard Tuaillon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Droplet Digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: from variable nonsense to publication quality data.

Authors:  Sean C Taylor; Genevieve Laperriere; Hugo Germain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Methods to determine limit of detection and limit of quantification in quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

Authors:  Amin Forootan; Robert Sjöback; Jens Björkman; Björn Sjögreen; Lucas Linz; Mikael Kubista
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2017-04-29

5.  qPCR data analysis: Better results through iconoclasm.

Authors:  Joel Tellinghuisen; Andrej-Nikolai Spiess
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2019-06-05

6.  Estrogen receptor profiles across tissues from male and female Rattus norvegicus.

Authors:  Dillion D Hutson; Rakesh Gurrala; Benard O Ogola; Margaret A Zimmerman; Ricardo Mostany; Ryousuke Satou; Sarah H Lindsey
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.027

7.  Modelling RT-qPCR cycle-threshold using digital PCR data for implementing SARS-CoV-2 viral load studies.

Authors:  Fabio Gentilini; Maria Elena Turba; Francesca Taddei; Tommaso Gritti; Michela Fantini; Giorgio Dirani; Vittorio Sambri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Unaccounted uncertainty from qPCR efficiency estimates entails uncontrolled false positive rates.

Authors:  Anders E Bilgrau; Steffen Falgreen; Anders Petersen; Malene K Kjeldsen; Julie S Bødker; Hans E Johnsen; Karen Dybkær; Martin Bøgsted
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Improved Survival and Initiation of Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Hepatocyte-Like Cells upon Culture in William's E Medium followed by Hepatocyte Differentiation Inducer Treatment.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Naoki Ishige
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  System-specific periodicity in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data questions threshold-based quantitation.

Authors:  Andrej-Nikolai Spiess; Stefan Rödiger; Michał Burdukiewicz; Thomas Volksdorf; Joel Tellinghuisen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.