Markus Loew1, Petra Magosch1, Sven Lichtenberg1, Peter Habermeyer2, Felix Porschke3. 1. Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, ATOS Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, ATOS Clinic, Munich, Germany. 3. BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at Heidelberg University Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Electronic address: felix.porschke@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Discrimination between acute traumatic and chronic degenerative rotator cuff lesions (RCLs) is an important aid to decision making in therapeutic management. To date, no clinical signs or radiologic findings that enable confident differentiation between these distinct etiologic entities have been identified. The purpose of this investigation was to perform a systematic analysis of known radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of RCLs and of further, not yet accurately described parameters. The hypothesis was that there are specific radiologic features that allow reliable discrimination between traumatic and nontraumatic RCLs. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with RCLs confirmed by MRI were enrolled in this study. Group A was made up of 25 patients with a history of trauma within the previous 6 weeks and no pre-existing shoulder pain, whereas group B comprised 25 patients with shoulder pain for not more than 12 months and no history of relevant trauma. Radiographs and magnetic resonance images were analyzed in a standardized protocol. RESULTS: No radiographic features were found to differ significantly between the 2 groups. On MRI, edema in the injured muscle was more common in group A (37.5% vs 4%, P = .04). A characteristic feature in traumatic RCLs was a wavelike appearance (kinking) of the central tendon (64% vs 32%, P = .03). In group B, more muscular atrophy was found (29.2% vs 60%, P = .02). Thinning and retraction did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: MRI, but not radiography, can be used to help discriminate between traumatic and nontraumatic RCLs. Although no absolute distinguishing feature was found, edema, kinking, and muscular atrophy are positive criteria for differentiation.
BACKGROUND: Discrimination between acute traumatic and chronic degenerative rotator cuff lesions (RCLs) is an important aid to decision making in therapeutic management. To date, no clinical signs or radiologic findings that enable confident differentiation between these distinct etiologic entities have been identified. The purpose of this investigation was to perform a systematic analysis of known radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of RCLs and of further, not yet accurately described parameters. The hypothesis was that there are specific radiologic features that allow reliable discrimination between traumatic and nontraumatic RCLs. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with RCLs confirmed by MRI were enrolled in this study. Group A was made up of 25 patients with a history of trauma within the previous 6 weeks and no pre-existing shoulder pain, whereas group B comprised 25 patients with shoulder pain for not more than 12 months and no history of relevant trauma. Radiographs and magnetic resonance images were analyzed in a standardized protocol. RESULTS: No radiographic features were found to differ significantly between the 2 groups. On MRI, edema in the injured muscle was more common in group A (37.5% vs 4%, P = .04). A characteristic feature in traumatic RCLs was a wavelike appearance (kinking) of the central tendon (64% vs 32%, P = .03). In group B, more muscular atrophy was found (29.2% vs 60%, P = .02). Thinning and retraction did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: MRI, but not radiography, can be used to help discriminate between traumatic and nontraumatic RCLs. Although no absolute distinguishing feature was found, edema, kinking, and muscular atrophy are positive criteria for differentiation.
Authors: Tanujan Thangarajah; Frederick Henshaw; Anita Sanghani-Kerai; Simon M Lambert; Catherine J Pendegrass; Gordon W Blunn Journal: Shoulder Elbow Date: 2017-03-08
Authors: Alexandre Lädermann; Stephen S Burkhart; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Lionel Neyton; Philippe Collin; Evan Yates; Patrick J Denard Journal: EFORT Open Rev Date: 2017-03-13
Authors: Fabian Plachel; Philipp Moroder; Renate Gehwolf; Herbert Tempfer; Andrea Wagner; Alexander Auffarth; Nicholas Matis; Stephan Pauly; Mark Tauber; Andreas Traweger Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Hannes Degenhardt; Markus Irger; Jonas Pogorzelski; Bernd Erber; Alexander Themessl; Marco-Christopher Rupp; Matthias J Feucht; Andreas B Imhoff Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 3.067