Literature DB >> 26234619

The Initial Slope of the Variogram, Foundation of the Trabecular Bone Score, Is Not or Is Poorly Associated With Vertebral Strength.

Ghislain Maquer1, Yongtao Lu2,3, Enrico Dall'Ara4, Yan Chevalier5, Matthias Krause6, Lang Yang4, Richard Eastell4, Kurt Lippuner7, Philippe K Zysset1.   

Abstract

Trabecular bone score (TBS) rests on the textural analysis of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to reflect the decay in trabecular structure characterizing osteoporosis. Yet, its discriminative power in fracture studies remains incomprehensible because prior biomechanical tests found no correlation with vertebral strength. To verify this result possibly owing to an unrealistic setup and to cover a wide range of loading scenarios, the data from three previous biomechanical studies using different experimental settings were used. They involved the compressive failure of 62 human lumbar vertebrae loaded 1) via intervertebral discs to mimic the in vivo situation ("full vertebra"); 2) via the classical endplate embedding ("vertebral body"); or 3) via a ball joint to induce anterior wedge failure ("vertebral section"). High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) scans acquired from prior testing were used to simulate anterior-posterior DXA from which areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and the initial slope of the variogram (ISV), the early definition of TBS, were evaluated. Finally, the relation of aBMD and ISV with failure load (F(exp)) and apparent failure stress (σexp) was assessed, and their relative contribution to a multilinear model was quantified via ANOVA. We found that, unlike aBMD, ISV did not significantly correlate with F(exp) and σexp , except for the "vertebral body" case (r(2) = 0.396, p = 0.028). Aside from the "vertebra section" setup where it explained only 6.4% of σexp (p = 0.037), it brought no significant improvement to aBMD. These results indicate that ISV, a replica of TBS, is a poor surrogate for vertebral strength no matter the testing setup, which supports the prior observations and raises a fortiori the question of the deterministic factors underlying the statistical relationship between TBS and vertebral fracture risk.
© 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIOMECHANICS; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT; OSTEOPOROSIS; TRABECULAR BONE SCORE (TBS); VERTEBRAL STRENGTH

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26234619     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  TBS and bone strength.

Authors:  Bernard Cortet; Valérie Bousson
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-03-02

3.  Variogram-based evaluations of DXA correlate with vertebral strength, but do not enhance the prediction compared to aBMD alone.

Authors:  Xuanliang Neil Dong; Yongtao Lu; Matthias Krause; Gerd Huber; Yan Chevalier; Huijie Leng; Ghislain Maquer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Sean Boone; Dimitri Martel; Chamith S Rajapakse; Robert S Hallyburton; Mitch Valko; Stephen Honig; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  The BALB/c mouse as a preclinical model of the age-related deterioration in the lumbar vertebra.

Authors:  Dominique Harris; Kate Garrett; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Amy Creecy; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry for the in-vivo assessment of bone strength: state of the art-outcomes of an expert consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Authors:  Nasser Al-Daghri; Jaime C Branco; Olivier Bruyère; Loredana Cavalli; Cyrus Cooper; Bernard Cortet; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Hans Peter Dimai; Stefano Gonnelli; Peyman Hadji; Philippe Halbout; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Andreas Kurth; Medea Locquet; Stefania Maggi; Radmila Matijevic; Jean-Yves Reginster; René Rizzoli; Thomas Thierry; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Predicting Trabecular Bone Stiffness from Clinical Cone-Beam CT and HR-pQCT Data; an In Vitro Study Using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Eva Klintström; Benjamin Klintström; Rodrigo Moreno; Torkel B Brismar; Dieter H Pahr; Örjan Smedby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.