Literature DB >> 26233734

Evaluating exposure of pedestrians to airborne contaminants associated with non-potable water use for pavement cleaning.

M Seidl1, G Da2, P Ausset3, S Haenn4, E Géhin2, L Moulin4.   

Abstract

Climate change and increasing demography press local authorities to look after affordable water resources and replacement of drinking water for city necessities like street and pavement cleaning by more available raw water. Though, the substitution of drinking by non-drinking resources demands the evaluation of sanitary hazards. This article aims therefore to evaluate the contribution of cleaning water to the overall exposure of city dwellers in case of wet pavement cleaning using crossed physical, chemical and biological approaches. The result of tracer experiments with fluorescein show that liquid water content of the cleaning aerosol produced is about 0.24 g m(-3), rending possible a fast estimation of exposure levels. In situ analysis of the aerosol particles indicates a significant increase in particle number concentration and particle diameter, though without change in particle composition. The conventional bacterial analysis using total coliforms as tracer suggests that an important part of the contamination is issued from the pavement. The qPCR results show a more than 20-fold increase of background genome concentration for Escherichia coli and 10-fold increase for Enterococcus but a negligible contribution of the cleaning water. The fluorescence analysis of the cleaning aerosol confirms the above findings identifying pavement surface as the major contributor to aerosol organic load. The physical, chemical and microbiological approaches used make it possible to describe accurately the cleaning bioaerosol and to identify the existence of significantly higher levels of all parameters studied during the wet pavement cleaning. Though, the low level of contamination and the very short time of passage of pedestrian in the zone do not suggest a significant risk for the city dwellers. As the cleaning workers remain much longer in the impacted area, more attention should be paid to their chronic exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airborne particles; Bioaerosol; Non-potable water uses; Paris; Pathogens; Street cleaning; Urban atmosphere

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233734     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5062-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  22 in total

1.  Determination of PM10 emission rates from street sweepers.

Authors:  D R Fitz; K Bumiller
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  A comprehensive assessment of PM emissions from paved roads: real-world Emission Factors and intense street cleaning trials.

Authors:  F Amato; S Nava; F Lucarelli; X Querol; A Alastuey; J M Baldasano; M Pandolfi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  A review on the effectiveness of street sweeping, washing and dust suppressants as urban PM control methods.

Authors:  F Amato; X Querol; C Johansson; C Nagl; A Alastuey
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.

Authors:  H R An; G Mainelis; M Yao
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.770

5.  A comparison of ten USEPA approved total coliform/E. coli tests.

Authors:  Jeremy Olstadt; James Jay Schauer; Jon Standridge; Sharon Kluender
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  Fluorescence intensity calibration using the Raman scatter peak of water.

Authors:  A J Lawaetz; C A Stedmon
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Evaluation of natural organic matter changes from Lake Hohloh by three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy during TiO(2)/UV process.

Authors:  Sergio Valencia; Juan M Marín; Gloria Restrepo; Fritz H Frimmel
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Comparison of fecal coliform agar and violet red bile lactose agar for fecal coliform enumeration in foods.

Authors:  A Leclercq; C Wanegue; P Baylac
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  A comparison of contact plate and calcium alginate swab techniques for quantitative assessment of bacteriological contamination of environmental surfaces.

Authors:  E Scott; S F Bloomfield; C G Barlow
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1984-04

10.  Microbial load from animal feces at a recreational beach.

Authors:  Mary E Wright; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Samir Elmir; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.553

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characterization and remediation of contamination: the influences of mining and other human activities.

Authors:  Pablo L Higueras; Francisco J Sáez-Martínez; Lorenzo Reyes-Bozo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.