Literature DB >> 15500631

Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.

H R An1, G Mainelis, M Yao.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study investigated the physical and biological performances of a portable centrifugal sampler for viable bioaerosols, RCS High Flow. The performance of the test sampler in the laboratory and field environments was compared with that of a reference sampler, BioSampler. The laboratory experiments with non-biological particles of KCl, oleic acid, and polystyrene latex showed that the test sampler's collection efficiency is about 22% for 0.5-microm particles, 48% for 1.0-microm particles, and approximately 100% for particles of 2.5 microm and larger. These tests indicated that the sampler's cut-off size (d50) was 1.1 microm. The test sampler's physical performance when collecting the spores and vegetative cells of Bacillus subtilis var. niger (BG) was similar to that when collecting non-biological particles of the same size. In the laboratory tests, the RCS High Flow sampler was found to enumerate approximately 40% of BG spores and cells relative to the reference sampler, BioSampler. A similar ratio was found during testing in an indoor environment. This ratio decreased to below 10% when testing was performed in an outdoor environment. We hypothesize that the test sampler's underperformance compared with the BioSampler could be caused by the damage to sensitive microorganisms during the collection process, test sampler's sensitivity to wind direction and speed as well as break-up of particle aggregates during the impingement process in BioSampler, which resulted in more colony-forming units (CFUs) being counted by the reference sampler than by the test sampler. Overall, when the RCS High Plus is used to sample culturable airborne microorganisms, the results obtained may have to be adjusted to avoid potential underestimation of microorganism concentration in the air. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The laboratory testing of the RCS High Flow bioaerosol sampler showed that the sampler collects 1 microm particles and larger with an efficiency of 50% and higher; the efficiency reaches approximately 100% for particles of 2.5 microm and larger. When considering this result, most of the airborne fungal spores would be collected with an efficiency between 50 and 100%. The field testing, however, indicated that the RCS High Flow sampler recovered from 41 to 71% of microorganisms collected relative to the reference sampler, Biosampler, and this ratio dropped to below 5% during outdoor testing. Thus, while the RCS High Flow sampler offers certain advantages over other samplers for viable bioaerosols--it is lightweight, battery operated, and collects viable microorganisms at a high flow rate directly on agar media, the results obtained may have to be adjusted to avoid potential underestimation of microorganism concentration in the air, especially if sampling is performed outdoors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15500631     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  10 in total

1.  Characterization of airborne bacteria at an underground subway station.

Authors:  Marius Dybwad; Per Einar Granum; Per Bruheim; Janet Martha Blatny
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Containment of bioaerosol infection risk by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and its applicability to point-of-care settings.

Authors:  Padmapriya P Banada; Satheesh K Sivasubramani; Robert Blakemore; Catharina Boehme; Mark D Perkins; Kevin Fennelly; David Alland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluating exposure of pedestrians to airborne contaminants associated with non-potable water use for pavement cleaning.

Authors:  M Seidl; G Da; P Ausset; S Haenn; E Géhin; L Moulin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Guillaume J Bilodeau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Miniaturizing Wet Scrubbers for Aerosolized Droplet Capture.

Authors:  Ulri N Lee; Tammi L van Neel; Fang Yun Lim; Jian Wei Khor; Jiayang He; Ravi S Vaddi; Angelo Q W Ong; Anthony Tang; Jean Berthier; John S Meschke; Igor V Novosselov; Ashleigh B Theberge; Erwin Berthier
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 8.008

6.  Association between increased DNA mutational frequency and thermal inactivation of aerosolized Bacillus spores exposed to dry heat.

Authors:  Elisabet Johansson; Atin Adhikari; Tiina Reponen; Michael Yermakov; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Incorporating polymerase chain reaction-based identification, population characterization, and quantification of microorganisms into aerosol science: A review.

Authors:  Jordan Peccia; Mark Hernandez
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Performance evaluation of high-volume electret filter air samplers in aerosol microbiome research.

Authors:  Kari Oline Bøifot; Jostein Gohli; Gunnar Skogan; Marius Dybwad
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2020-07-28

9.  The efficient method for simultaneous monitoring of the culturable as well as nonculturable airborne microorganisms.

Authors:  Barbara Hubad; Aleš Lapanje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A high-flow portable biological aerosol trap (HighBioTrap) for rapid microbial detection.

Authors:  Haoxuan Chen; Maosheng Yao
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.433

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.