Literature DB >> 26233567

Breath carbonyl compounds as biomarkers of lung cancer.

Mingxiao Li1, Dake Yang2, Guy Brock2, Ralph J Knipp3, Michael Bousamra4, Michael H Nantz3, Xiao-An Fu5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer dysregulations impart oxidative stress which results in important metabolic products in the form of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. The objective of this work is to use statistical classification models to determine specific carbonyl VOCs in exhaled breath as biomarkers for detection of lung cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Exhaled breath samples from 85 patients with untreated lung cancer, 34 patients with benign pulmonary nodules and 85 healthy controls were collected. Carbonyl compounds in exhaled breath were captured by silicon microreactors and analyzed by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS). The concentrations of carbonyl compounds were analyzed using a variety of statistical classification models to determine which compounds best differentiated between the patient sub-populations. Predictive accuracy of each of the models was assessed on a separate test data set.
RESULTS: Six carbonyl compounds (C(4)H(8)O, C(5)H(10)O, C(2)H(4)O(2), C(4)H(8)O(2), C(6)H(10)O(2), C(9)H(16)O(2)) had significantly elevated concentrations in lung cancer patients vs. CONTROLS: A model based on counting the number of elevated compounds out of these six achieved an overall classification accuracy on the test data of 97% (95% CI 92%-100%), 95% (95% CI 88%-100%), and 89% (95% CI 79%-99%) for classifying lung cancer patients vs. non-smokers, current smokers, and patients with benign nodules, respectively. These results were comparable to benchmarking based on established statistical and machine-learning methods. The sensitivity in each case was 96% or higher, with specificity ranging from 64% for benign nodule patients to 86% for smokers and 100% for non-smokers.
CONCLUSION: A model based on elevated levels of the six carbonyl VOCs effectively discriminates lung cancer patients from healthy controls as well as patients with benign pulmonary nodules.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Carbonyl compound; Exhaled breath; Lung cancer; Statistical model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233567     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  12 in total

Review 1.  From diagnosis to therapy in lung cancer: management of CT detected pulmonary nodules, a summary of the 2015 Chinese-German Lung Cancer Expert Panel.

Authors:  Chunxia Su; Mathias Meyer; Robert Pirker; Wieland Voigt; Jingyun Shi; Lothar Pilz; Rudolf M Huber; Yilong Wu; Jinghong Wang; Yonglan He; Xuan Wang; Jian Zhang; Xiuyi Zhi; Meiqi Shi; Bo Zhu; Stefan S Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler; Christian Manegold; Caicun Zhou; Eric Dominic Roessner
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08

2.  The Influence of β-Ammonium Substitution on the Reaction Kinetics of Aminooxy Condensations with Aldehydes and Ketones.

Authors:  Mumiye A Ogunwale; Ralph J Knipp; Clint N Evrard; Lee M Thompson; Michael H Nantz; Xiao-An Fu
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 3.  Breath Analysis: A Promising Tool for Disease Diagnosis-The Role of Sensors.

Authors:  Maria Kaloumenou; Evangelos Skotadis; Nefeli Lagopati; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Dimitris Tsoukalas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Headspace Volatile Organic Compound Profiling of Pleural Mesothelioma and Lung Cancer Cell Lines as Translational Bridge for Breath Research.

Authors:  Eline Janssens; Zoë Mol; Lore Vandermeersch; Sabrina Lagniau; Karim Y Vermaelen; Jan P van Meerbeeck; Christophe Walgraeve; Elly Marcq; Kevin Lamote
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Accuracy and Methodologic Challenges of Volatile Organic Compound-Based Exhaled Breath Tests for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  George B Hanna; Piers R Boshier; Sheraz R Markar; Andrea Romano
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  A novel technology to integrate imaging and clinical markers for non-invasive diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed Shaffie; Ahmed Soliman; Xiao-An Fu; Michael Nantz; Guruprasad Giridharan; Victor van Berkel; Hadil Abu Khalifeh; Mohammed Ghazal; Adel Elmaghraby; Ayman El-Baz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  [Advances on Collection and Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds 
in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer].

Authors:  Ling Guo; Hong Wu; Qiang Li; Chuan Xu; Yuyang Liu
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2021-11-20

Review 8.  Lipid Peroxidation Produces a Diverse Mixture of Saturated and Unsaturated Aldehydes in Exhaled Breath That Can Serve as Biomarkers of Lung Cancer-A Review.

Authors:  Saurin R Sutaria; Sadakatali S Gori; James D Morris; Zhenzhen Xie; Xiao-An Fu; Michael H Nantz
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-06-18

9.  Monitoring cancer prognosis, diagnosis and treatment efficacy using metabolomics and lipidomics.

Authors:  Emily G Armitage; Andrew D Southam
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 10.  Biomarkers for early diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: Do we need another moonshot?

Authors:  Sabrina Lagniau; Kevin Lamote; Jan P van Meerbeeck; Karim Y Vermaelen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.