| Literature DB >> 26232882 |
Juliane Salbach-Hirsch1, Sergey A Samsonov2, Vera Hintze3, Christine Hofbauer4, Ann-Kristin Picke1, Martina Rauner1, Jan-Philip Gehrcke2, Stephanie Moeller5, Matthias Schnabelrauch5, Dieter Scharnweber6, M Teresa Pisabarro2, Lorenz C Hofbauer7.
Abstract
In order to improve bone defect regeneration, the development of new adaptive biomaterials and their functional and biological validation is warranted. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are important extracellular matrix (ECM) components in bone and may display osteogenic properties that are potentially useful for biomaterial coatings. Using hyaluronan (HA), chondroitin sulfate (CS) and chemically modified highly sulfated HA and CS derivatives (sHA3 and sCS3; degree of sulfation ∼3), we evaluated how GAG sulfation modulates Wnt signaling, a major regulator of osteoblast, osteoclast and osteocyte biology. GAGs were tested for their capability to bind to sclerostin, an inhibitor of Wnt signaling, using surface plasmon resonance and molecular modeling to characterize their interactions. GAGs bound sclerostin in a concentration- and sulfate-dependent manner at a common binding region. These findings were confirmed in an LRP5/sclerostin interaction study and an in vitro model of Wnt activation. Here, pre-incubation of sclerostin with different GAGs led to a sulfate- and dose-dependent loss of its bioactivity. Using GAG-biotin derivatives in a competitive ELISA approach sclerostin was shown to be the preferred binding partner over Wnt3a. In conclusion, highly sulfated GAGs might control bone homeostasis via interference with sclerostin/LRP5/6 complex formation. Whether these properties can be utilized to improve bone regeneration needs to be validated in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: Chondroitin sulfate (CS); Hyaluronic acid/hyaluronan (HA) sulfate; Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6); Molecular docking; Sclerostin; Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26232882 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomaterials ISSN: 0142-9612 Impact factor: 12.479