Literature DB >> 26232363

Field-stepped direct detection electron paramagnetic resonance.

Zhelin Yu1, Tengzhi Liu1, Hanan Elajaili1, George A Rinard2, Sandra S Eaton1, Gareth R Eaton3.   

Abstract

The widest scan that had been demonstrated previously for rapid scan EPR was a 155G sinusoidal scan. As the scan width increases, the voltage requirement across the resonating capacitor and scan coils increases dramatically and the background signal induced by the rapidly changing field increases. An alternate approach is needed to achieve wider scans. A field-stepped direct detection EPR method that is based on rapid-scan technology is now reported, and scan widths up to 6200G have been demonstrated. A linear scan frequency of 5.12kHz was generated with the scan driver described previously. The field was stepped at intervals of 0.01 to 1G, depending on the linewidths in the spectra. At each field data for triangular scans with widths up to 11.5G were acquired. Data from the triangular scans were combined by matching DC offsets for overlapping regions of successive scans. This approach has the following advantages relative to CW, several of which are similar to the advantages of rapid scan. (i) In CW if the modulation amplitude is too large, the signal is broadened. In direct detection field modulation is not used. (ii) In CW the small modulation amplitude detects only a small fraction of the signal amplitude. In direct detection each scan detects a larger fraction of the signal, which improves the signal-to-noise ratio. (iii) If the scan rate is fast enough to cause rapid scan oscillations, the slow scan spectrum can be recovered by deconvolution after the combination of segments. (iv) The data are acquired with quadrature detection, which permits phase correction in the post processing. (v) In the direct detection method the signal typically is oversampled in the field direction. The number of points to be averaged, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio, is determined in post processing based on the desired field resolution. A degased lithium phthalocyanine sample was used to demonstrate that the linear deconvolution procedure can be employed with field-stepped direct detection EPR signals. Field-stepped direct detection EPR spectra were obtained for Cu(2+) doped in Ni(diethyldithiocarbamate)2, Cu(2+) doped in Zn tetratolylporphyrin, perdeuterated tempone in sucrose octaacetate, vanadyl ion doped in a parasubstituted Zn tetratolylporphyrin, Mn(2+) impurity in CaO, and an oriented crystal of Mn(2+) doped in Mg(acetylacetonate)2(H2O)2.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct detection; Metalloporphyrin; Mn(2+); Rapid scan

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26232363      PMCID: PMC4561016          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2015.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  12 in total

1.  X-band rapid-scan EPR of nitroxyl radicals.

Authors:  Deborah G Mitchell; Richard W Quine; Mark Tseitlin; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Detection of undistorted continuous wave (CW) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra with non-adiabatic rapid sweep (NARS) of the magnetic field.

Authors:  Aaron W Kittell; Theodore G Camenisch; Joseph J Ratke; Jason W Sidabras; James S Hyde
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Deconvolution of sinusoidal rapid EPR scans.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Rapid-scan EPR with triangular scans and fourier deconvolution to recover the slow-scan spectrum.

Authors:  Janhavi P Joshi; John R Ballard; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Digitally generated excitation and near-baseband quadrature detection of rapid scan EPR signals.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; Zhelin Yu; Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Inter-spin distance determination using L-band (1-2 GHz) non-adiabatic rapid sweep electron paramagnetic resonance (NARS EPR).

Authors:  Aaron W Kittell; Eric J Hustedt; James S Hyde
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Spin-label CW microwave power saturation and rapid passage with triangular non-adiabatic rapid sweep (NARS) and adiabatic rapid passage (ARP) EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Aaron W Kittell; James S Hyde
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  A Linear Magnetic Field Scan Driver.

Authors:  Richard W Quine; Tomasz Czechowski; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 1.176

9.  Corrections for sinusoidal background and non-orthogonality of signal channels in sinusoidal rapid magnetic field scans.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; Deborah G Mitchell; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Moving difference (MDIFF) non-adiabatic rapid sweep (NARS) EPR of copper(II).

Authors:  James S Hyde; Brian Bennett; Aaron W Kittell; Jason M Kowalski; Jason W Sidabras
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  7 in total

1.  Rapid-Scan EPR of Nitroxide Spin Labels and Semiquinones.

Authors:  Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Rapid Scan EPR imaging as a Tool for Magnetic Field Mapping.

Authors:  Oxana Tseytlin; Andrey A Bobko; Mark Tseytlin
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 0.831

3.  Background correction in rapid scan EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Laura A Buchanan; Lukas B Woodcock; Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  250 MHz Rapid Scan Cross Loop Resonator.

Authors:  Laura A Buchanan; Lukas B Woodcock; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Yilin Shi; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 0.831

Review 5.  Rapid-scan EPR imaging.

Authors:  Sandra S Eaton; Yilin Shi; Lukas Woodcock; Laura A Buchanan; Joseph McPeak; Richard W Quine; George A Rinard; Boris Epel; Howard J Halpern; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Electron Spin Relaxation of Tb3+ and Tm3+ Ions.

Authors:  Joseph McPeak; Dinu Alexander; Cyriac Joseph; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 0.831

Review 7.  EPR Everywhere.

Authors:  Joshua R Biller; Joseph E McPeak
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 0.831

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.