Literature DB >> 25164798

The place of modeling in cognitive science.

James L McClelland1.   

Abstract

I consider the role of cognitive modeling in cognitive science. Modeling, and the computers that enable it, are central to the field, but the role of modeling is often misunderstood. Models are not intended to capture fully the processes they attempt to elucidate. Rather, they are explorations of ideas about the nature of cognitive processes. In these explorations, simplification is essential-through simplification, the implications of the central ideas become more transparent. This is not to say that simplification has no downsides; it does, and these are discussed. I then consider several contemporary frameworks for cognitive modeling, stressing the idea that each framework is useful in its own particular ways. Increases in computer power (by a factor of about 4 million) since 1958 have enabled new modeling paradigms to emerge, but these also depend on new ways of thinking. Will new paradigms emerge again with the next 1,000-fold increase?
Copyright © 2009 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian approaches; Cognitive architectures; Computer simulation; Connectionist models; Dynamical systems; Hybrid models; Modeling frameworks; Symbolic models of cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 25164798     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01003.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  31 in total

1.  A neurobehavioral model of flexible spatial language behaviors.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Sebastian Schneegans; Yulia Sandamirskaya; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Evaluating the random representation assumption of lexical semantics in cognitive models.

Authors:  Brendan T Johns; Michael N Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

3.  Unraveling the sub-processes of selective attention: insights from dynamic modeling and continuous behavior.

Authors:  Simon Frisch; Maja Dshemuchadse; Max Görner; Thomas Goschke; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-02

Review 4.  What we talk about when we talk about access deficits.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Computational cognitive modeling of the temporal dynamics of fatigue from sleep loss.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; Glenn Gunzelmann; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

6.  Task effects determine whether recognition memory is mediated discretely or continuously.

Authors:  Ryan M McAdoo; Kylie N Key; Scott D Gronlund
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

7.  Why won't you do what I want? The informative failures of children and models.

Authors:  Christopher H Chatham; Benjamin E Yerys; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2012-10-01

8.  Integration of new information in memory: new insights from a complementary learning systems perspective.

Authors:  James L McClelland; Bruce L McNaughton; Andrew K Lampinen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Contributions of modern network science to the cognitive sciences: revisiting research spirals of representation and process.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Cynthia S Q Siew
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.704

10.  What can we learn from learning models about sensitivity to letter-order in visual word recognition?

Authors:  Itamar Lerner; Blair C Armstrong; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.