Literature DB >> 26231310

Salvage ablative therapy in prostate cancer: international multidisciplinary consensus on trial design.

Willemien van den Bos1, Berrend G Muller2, Daniel M de Bruin2, Andre Luis de Castro Abreu3, Christian Chaussy4, Jonathan A Coleman5, Antonio Finelli6, Inderbir S Gill7, Mitchell E Gross7, Sjoerd F M Jenniskens8, Frank Kahmann9, M Pilar Laguna-Pes2, Ardeshir R Rastinehad10, Lucy A Simmons11, Tullio Sulser12, Arnauld Villers13, John F Ward14, Jean J M C H de la Rosette2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Salvage ablative therapy (SAT) has been developed as a form of localized treatment for localized recurrence of prostate cancers following radiation therapy. To better address the utility of SAT, prospective clinical trials must address the aspects of accepted standards in the initial evaluation, treatment, follow-up, and outcomes in the oncology community. We undertook this study to achieve consensus on uniform standardized trial design for SAT trials.
METHODS: A literature search was performed and an international multidisciplinary group of experts was identified. A questionnaire was constructed and sent out to 71 participants in 3 consecutive rounds according to the Delphi method. The project was concluded with a face-to-face meeting in which the results were reviewed and conclusions were formulated.
RESULTS: Patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy were considered candidates for a SAT trial using any ablation scenario performed with cryotherapy or high-intensity focused ultrasound. It is feasible to compare different sources of energy or to compare with historical data on salvage radical prostatectomy outcomes. The primary objective should be to assess the efficacy of the treatment for negative biopsy rate at 12 months. Secondary objectives should include safety parameters and quality-of-life assessment. Exclusion criteria should include evidence of local or distant metastases. The optimal biopsy strategy is image-guided targeted biopsies. Follow-up includes multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate-specific antigen level, and quality of life for at least 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary board from international experts reached consensus on trial design for SAT in prostate cancer and provides a standard for designing a feasible SAT trial.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consensus; Salvage ablative therapy; Trial design

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26231310      PMCID: PMC9083830          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   2.954


  14 in total

1.  Whole-gland salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for localized prostate cancer recurrence after external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Paul Cathcart; Venu Chalasani; Andrew Williams; Neil McCartan; Alex Freeman; Alex Kirkham; Clare Allen; Joseph Chin; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound for patients with recurrent prostate cancer after brachytherapy.

Authors:  Vladimir Yutkin; Hashim U Ahmed; Ian Donaldson; Neil McCartan; Khurram Siddiqui; Mark Emberton; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Pretreatment nomogram that predicts 5-year probability of metastasis following three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael W Kattan; Michael J Zelefsky; Patrick A Kupelian; Daniel Cho; Peter T Scardino; Zvi Fuks; Steven A Leibel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Long-term multi-institutional analysis of stage T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy in the PSA era.

Authors:  Deborah A Kuban; Howard D Thames; Larry B Levy; Eric M Horwitz; Patrick A Kupelian; Alvaro A Martinez; Jeff M Michalski; Thomas M Pisansky; Howard M Sandler; William U Shipley; Michael J Zelefsky; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Cancer control and complications of salvage local therapy after failure of radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arti Parekh; Powell L Graham; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 6.  Management of biochemical recurrence after primary treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sanoj Punnen; Matthew R Cooperberg; Anthony V D'Amico; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Judd W Moul; Howard I Scher; Thorsten Schlomm; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Recurrence-free survival rates after external-beam radiotherapy for patients with clinical T1-T3 prostate carcinoma in the prostate-specific antigen era: what should we expect?

Authors:  Deepak Khuntia; Chandana A Reddy; Arul Mahadevan; Eric A Klein; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prostate cancer modality time trend analyses from 1973 to 2004: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry analysis.

Authors:  Ashesh B Jani; Peter A S Johnstone; Stanley L Liauw; Viraj A Master; Peter J Rossi
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.339

9.  Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in focal therapy for prostate cancer: a Delphi consensus project.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Willemien van den Bos; Maurizio Brausi; Francois Cornud; Paolo Gontero; Alexander Kirkham; Peter A Pinto; Thomas J Polascik; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Theo M de Reijke; Jean J de la Rosette; Osamu Ukimura; Arnauld Villers; Jochen Walz; Hessel Wijkstra; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Focal therapy in prostate cancer: international multidisciplinary consensus on trial design.

Authors:  Willemien van den Bos; Berrend G Muller; Hashim Ahmed; Chris H Bangma; Eric Barret; Sebastien Crouzet; Scott E Eggener; Inderbir S Gill; Steven Joniau; Gyoergy Kovacs; Sascha Pahernik; Jean J de la Rosette; Olivier Rouvière; Georg Salomon; John F Ward; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  4 in total

1.  Identification of Site-specific Recurrence Following Primary Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Using C-11 Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Nomogram for Predicting Extrapelvic Disease.

Authors:  William P Parker; Brian J Davis; Sean S Park; Kenneth R Olivier; Richard Choo; Mark A Nathan; Val J Lowe; Timothy J Welch; Jaden D Evans; William S Harmsen; Harras B Zaid; Ilya Sobol; Daniel M Moreira; Rimki Haloi; Matthew K Tollefson; Matthew T Gettman; Stephen A Boorjian; Lance A Mynderse; R Jeffrey Karnes; Eugene D Kwon
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Management Options for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Farhad Fakhrejahani; Ravi A Madan; William L Dahut
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-05

3.  Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer persistence after brachytherapy: repeated use of a polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Hepp; Thilo Eggert; Georg Schabl; Lars Herberholz; Tim Petry; Razvan Galalae
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-04-30

Review 4.  A scoping review of core outcome sets and their 'mapping' onto real-world data using prostate cancer as a case study.

Authors:  Michela Meregaglia; Oriana Ciani; Helen Banks; Maximilian Salcher-Konrad; Caroline Carney; Sahan Jayawardana; Paula Williamson; Giovanni Fattore
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.