Literature DB >> 14575822

Long-term multi-institutional analysis of stage T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy in the PSA era.

Deborah A Kuban1, Howard D Thames, Larry B Levy, Eric M Horwitz, Patrick A Kupelian, Alvaro A Martinez, Jeff M Michalski, Thomas M Pisansky, Howard M Sandler, William U Shipley, Michael J Zelefsky, Anthony L Zietman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the long-term outcome for patients with Stage T1-T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate definitively irradiated in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine institutions combined data on 4839 patients with Stage T1b, T1c, and T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had a pretreatment PSA level and had received >or=60 Gy as definitive external beam radiotherapy. No patient had hormonal therapy before treatment failure. The median follow-up was 6.3 years. The end point for outcome analysis was PSA disease-free survival at 5 and 8 years after therapy using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) failure definition.
RESULTS: The PSA disease-free survival rate for the entire group of patients was 59% at 5 years and 53% at 8 years after treatment. For patients who had received >or=70 Gy, these percentages were 61% and 55%. Of the 4839 patients, 1582 had failure by the PSA criteria, 416 had local failure, and 329 had distant failure. The greatest risk of failure was at 1.5-3.5 years after treatment. The failure rate was 3.5-4.5% annually after 5 years, except in patients with Gleason score 8-10 tumors for whom it was 6%. In multivariate analysis for biochemical failure, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, radiation dose, tumor stage, and treatment year were all significant prognostic factors. The length of follow-up and the effect of backdating as required by the ASTRO failure definition also significantly affected the outcome results. Dose effects were most significant in the intermediate-risk group and to a lesser degree in the high-risk group. No dose effect was seen at 70 or 72 Gy in the low-risk group.
CONCLUSION: As follow-up lengthens and outcome data accumulate in the PSA era, we continue to evaluate the efficacy and durability of radiotherapy as definitive therapy for early-stage prostate cancer. Similar studies with higher doses and more contemporary techniques will be necessary to explore more fully the potential of this therapeutic modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575822     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00632-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  71 in total

Review 1.  The 'CaP Calculator': an online decision support tool for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew S Katz; Jason A Efstathiou; Anthony V D'Amico; Michael W Kattan; Martin G Sanda; Paul L Nguyen; Matthew R Smith; Peter R Carroll; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Combining radiation therapy and androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer-a critical review.

Authors:  A Dal Pra; F L Cury; L Souhami
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Salvage robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Jim C Hu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Acute anal toxicity after whole pelvic radiotherapy in patients with asymptomatic haemorrhoids: identification of dosimetric and patient factors.

Authors:  H Jang; J G Baek; S-J Yoo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  [PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy].

Authors:  J Fichtner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Multiparametric 3T endorectal mri after external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Galen D Reed; Phillip P Vinh; Christopher Sotto; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Ionizing radiation induces neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer cells in vitro, in vivo and in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Xuehong Deng; Bennett D Elzey; Jean M Poulson; Wallace B Morrison; Song-Chu Ko; Noah M Hahn; Timothy L Ratliff; Chang-Deng Hu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Effect of naturopathic and nutritional supplement treatment on tumor response, control, and recurrence in patients with prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Donald P Braun; Digant Gupta; Timothy C Birdsall; Michele Sumner; Edgar D Staren
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.579

9.  Regarding the focal treatment of prostate cancer: inference of the Gleason grade from magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Ryan S Brame; Marco Zaider; Kristen L Zakian; Jason A Koutcher; Amita Shukla-Dave; Victor E Reuter; Michael J Zelefsky; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Patterns of outcome and toxicity after salvage prostatectomy, salvage cryosurgery and salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer recurrences after radiation therapy: a multi-center experience and literature review.

Authors:  Max Peters; Maaike R Moman; Henk G van der Poel; Henk Vergunst; Igle Jan de Jong; Peter L M Vijverberg; Jan J Battermann; Simon Horenblas; Marco van Vulpen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.