Literature DB >> 26230492

Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Women With Type 2 Diabetes Measured by Coronary Phase Contrast Flow Velocity Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Christopher D Maroules1, Alice Y Chang, Melanie S Kotys-Traughber, Ronald M Peshock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if differences in coronary endothelial function are observed between asymptomatic women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and control subjects using coronary phase contrast flow velocity magnetic resonance imaging in response to cold pressor stress, an established endothelium-dependent vasodilatory stress.
METHODS: Phase contrast flow velocity imaging of the right coronary artery was performed in 7 asymptomatic premenopausal women with DM and 8 healthy female participants in response to the cold pressor test at 3 T.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in percent increase in coronary flow velocity from rest to peak flow velocity between DM and control subjects (32% ± 22% vs 46% ± 17%; P = 0.11). However, percent increase in coronary flow velocity was lower in DM than in control subjects (-3% ± 14% vs 31% ± 30%; P = 0.01) during the second minute of cold pressor stress, when endothelial-mediated vasodilation should occur.
CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic women with DM demonstrate reduced coronary flow velocity during the second minute of cold pressor stress, indicating coronary endothelial dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26230492      PMCID: PMC4814774          DOI: 10.1097/JIM.0000000000000226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Med        ISSN: 1081-5589            Impact factor:   2.895


  33 in total

1.  Spiral phase velocity mapping of left and right coronary artery blood flow: correction for through-plane motion using selective fat-only excitation.

Authors:  Jennifer Keegan; Peter D Gatehouse; Guang-Zhong Yang; David N Firmin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  In vitro validation of phase-contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: precision, accuracy, and signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Joachim Lotz; Rolf Döker; Ralph Noeske; Meike Schüttert; Roland Felix; Michael Galanski; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerd Peter Meyer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  MR-based coronary artery blood velocity measurements in patients without coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M Schiemann; F Bakhtiary; V Hietschold; A Koch; A Esmaeili; H Ackermann; A Moritz; T J Vogl; N D Abolmaali
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Effect on coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist.

Authors:  Takayuki Kawata; Masao Daimon; Rei Hasegawa; Kiyomi Teramoto; Tomohiko Toyoda; Tai Sekine; Kyohei Yamamoto; Daigaku Uchida; Toshiharu Himi; Katsuya Yoshida; Issei Komuro
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Sex differences in cardiovascular and total mortality among diabetic and non-diabetic individuals with or without history of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Hu; P Jousilahti; Q Qiao; S Katoh; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Coronary circulatory dysfunction in insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  John O Prior; Manuel J Quiñones; Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni; Alvaro D Facta; Thomas H Schindler; James W Sayre; Willa A Hsueh; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Coronary artery flow measurement using navigator echo gated phase contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Kevin Johnson; Puneet Sharma; John Oshinski
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Diabetes patients requiring glucose-lowering therapy and nondiabetics with a prior myocardial infarction carry the same cardiovascular risk: a population study of 3.3 million people.

Authors:  Tina Ken Schramm; Gunnar H Gislason; Lars Køber; Søren Rasmussen; Jeppe N Rasmussen; Steen Z Abildstrøm; Morten Lock Hansen; Fredrik Folke; Pernille Buch; Mette Madsen; Allan Vaag; Christian Torp-Pedersen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Relation between stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects on cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with cardiac syndrome X.

Authors:  Gaetano A Lanza; Antonino Buffon; Alfonso Sestito; Luigi Natale; Gregory A Sgueglia; Leda Galiuto; Fabio Infusino; Luca Mariani; Antonio Centola; Filippo Crea
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  MR imaging of the arterial vessel wall: molecular imaging from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Marcus R Makowski; René M Botnar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Feasibility of coronary endothelial function assessment using arterial spin labeled CMR.

Authors:  Ahsan Javed; Andrew Yoon; Steven Cen; Krishna S Nayak; Parveen Garg
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Phase contrast coronary blood velocity mapping with both high temporal and spatial resolution using triggered Golden Angle rotated Spiral k-t Sparse Parallel imaging (GASSP) with shifted binning.

Authors:  Dan Zhu; Gabriele Bonanno; Allison G Hays; Robert G Weiss; Michael Schär
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.737

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.