| Literature DB >> 26230251 |
Jennifer C McElwain1,2, Charilaos Yiotis1,2, Tracy Lawson3.
Abstract
Understanding the drivers of geological-scale patterns in plant macroevolution is limited by a hesitancy to use measurable traits of fossils to infer palaeoecophysiological function. Here, scaling relationships between morphological traits including maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (gmax ) and leaf vein density (Dv ) and physiological measurements including operational stomatal conductance (gop ), saturated (Asat ) and maximum (Amax ) assimilation rates were investigated for 18 extant taxa in order to improve understanding of angiosperm diversification in the Cretaceous. Our study demonstrated significant relationships between gop , gmax and Dv that together can be used to estimate gas exchange and the photosynthetic capacities of fossils. We showed that acquisition of high gmax in angiosperms conferred a competitive advantage over gymnosperms by increasing the dynamic range (plasticity) of their gas exchange and expanding their ecophysiological niche space. We suggest that species with a high gmax (> 1400 mmol m(-2) s(-1) ) would have been capable of maintaining a high Amax as the atmospheric CO2 declined through the Cretaceous, whereas gymnosperms with a low gmax would experience severe photosynthetic penalty. Expansion of the ecophysiological niche space in angiosperms, afforded by coordinated evolution of high gmax , Dv and increased plasticity in gop , adds further functional insights into the mechanisms driving angiosperm speciation.Entities:
Keywords: evolution of angiosperms; functional traits; maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (gmax); palaeophysiology; plasticity; stomatal density; stomatal evolution; vein density (Dv)
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26230251 PMCID: PMC5014202 DOI: 10.1111/nph.13579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New Phytol ISSN: 0028-646X Impact factor: 10.151
Estimated and measured assimilation rates
| Species |
| Measured | Measured | Est. | Model to estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 374 | 7.63 ± 1.06 | 17.20 ± 4.00 | 7.56 |
|
|
| 491 | 4.73 ± 1.91 | 8.87 ± 0.98 | 11.17 |
|
|
| 526 | 5.24 ± 1.02 | 19.34 ± 2.00 | 9.11 |
|
|
| 554 | 11.5 ± 1.59 | 20.80 ± 3.70 | 11.55 |
|
|
| 669 | 7.79 ± 1.44 | 12.00 ± 2.00 | 12.36 |
|
|
| 374 | 4.44 ± 1.80 | 17.60 ± 3.30 | 10.15 |
|
|
| 1529 | 9.37 ± 1.86 | 18.29 ± 0.26 | 18.74 |
|
|
| 963 | 9.20 ± 1.90 | 21.25 ± 3.29 | 16.58 |
|
g max, maximum theoretical stomatal conductance; A sat, saturated assimilation rate; A max, maximum assimilation rate. n = 10–12; errors, ± SD; G, gymnosperm; A, angiosperm; F, fern.
Figure 1Relationship between stomatal and photosynthetic traits. (a) Scaling relationship between maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (g max) and mean operational stomatal conductance (g op) of five gymnosperms (green squares), one fern (blue squares) and 12 angiosperm (pink squares) species measured using the ‘variance protocol’ in glasshouse conditions over a 5–13 d period in 2011–2012. All data points represent mean g op values of between 42 and 72 individual measurements per species regressed against g max (g op = 0.2507 g max; r 2 = 0.5446, P = 0.00039). (b) Species g op : g max scaling relationships (± standard deviation) regressed against mean saturated photosynthetic rate (A sat) (g op : g max = 0.0125A sat + 0.093; r 2 = 0.36652; P = 0.007758). Examples of species studied from left to right include Nageia nagi, Ginkgo biloba and Lepidozamia peroffskyana (upper panel) and Colocasia esculenta, Osmunda regalis and Ricinus communis (lower panel).
Mean (± standard deviation) stomatal density (SD), geometry, conductance and vein density data
| Species | SD mm−2 | Pore length μm | Pore depth μm | Maximum |
| Average | Maximum | Average |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 39 ± 3.9 | 26.2 ± 1.8 | 14.12 ± 5.9 | 0.398 | 374 | 66 ± 29.8 | 149 | 0.18 | 0.93 |
|
| 104 ± 9.7 | 15.9 ± 0.8 | 11.20 ± 1.44 | 0.146 | 526 | 31 ± 20.9 | 77 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
|
| 95 ± 15.4 | 19.4 ± 0.8 | 15.09 ± 1.52 | 0.308 | 554 | 64 ± 31.5 | 171 | 0.11 | 1.13 |
|
| 40 ± 1.3 | 27.7 ± 1.4 | 9.65 ± 1.63 | 0.334 | 491 | 65 ± 41.5 | 164 | 0.13 | 1.33 |
|
| 51 ± 15.6 | 19.9 ± 1.8 | 10.57 ± 2.83 | 0.692 | 374 | 117 ± 68.3 | 259 | 0.31 | 1.37 |
|
| 55 ± 8.0 | 32.7 ± 4.0 | 17.02 ± 3.2 | 0.375 | 698 | 132 ± 66.0 | 262 | 0.19 | 3.27 |
|
| 131 ± 11.9 | 18.3 ± 2.9 | 10.19 ± 1.05 | 0.293 | 863 | 130 ± 44.1 | 253 | 0.15 | 4.87 |
|
| 76 ± 6.0 | 14.1 ± 2.3 | 8.9 ± 1.0 | 0.590 | 361 | 129 ± 115.2 | 213 | 0.36 | 2.6 |
|
| 80 ± 1.0 | 7.5 ± 1.1 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 0.765 | 226 | 81 ± 43.0 | 173 | 0.36 | 3.0 |
|
| 83 ± 11 | 17.7 ± 3.3 | 8.8 ± 0.9 | 0.714 | 559 | 186 ± 95.9 | 399 | 0.33 | 3.2 |
|
| 205 ± 29.8 | 19.2 ± 1.9 | 9.14 ± 1.19 | 0.164 | 1529 | 105 ± 88.7 | 250 | 0.07 | 5.71 |
|
| 81 ± 10 | 13.3 ± 2.4 | 4.4 ± 1.3 | 0.530 | 487 | 71 ± 58.1 | 258 | 0.15 | 4.4 |
|
| 63 ± 7 | 15.7 ± 2.7 | 5.3 ± 0.7 | 0.966 | 443 | 191 ± 89.1 | 428 | 0.43 | 4.6 |
|
| 390 ± 12 | 6.3 ± 1.0 | 6.4 ± 1.0 | 0.364 | 626 | 113 ± 45.3 | 228 | 0.18 | 5.1 |
|
| 135 ± 15 | 12.9 ± 1.8 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 0.834 | 1292 | 354 ± 194.2 | 1077 | 0.27 | 6.2 |
|
| 345 ± 11 | 6.2 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 0.481 | 865 | 195 ± 110.1 | 416 | 0.23 | 6.2 |
|
| 180 ± 11 | 16.7 ± 1.8 | 8.0 ± 1.3 | 0.811 | 1164 | 452 ± 180.4 | 944 | 0.39 | 6.7 |
|
| 163 ± 19 | 15.1 ± 1.8 | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 0.984 | 1736 | 677 ± 350.0 | 1708 | 0.39 | 8.7 |
g op, operational stomatal conductance; g max, maximum theoretical stomatal conductance; D v, leaf vein density.
Figure 2Examination of relationships between stomatal and leaf vein traits. (a) Relationship between vein density (D v, mm mm−2) and both operational stomatal conductance (g op; coloured boxplots based on variance protocol from 2011 to 2012) and theoretical stomatal conductance (g max; coloured dots) of 12 angiosperms (ang.), five gymnosperms (gym.) and one fern (fn.). From left to right species are: Lepidozamia hopei (gym., cycad), Nageia nagi (gym., conifer), Agathis australis (gym., conifer), (gym., cycad), Ginkgo biloba (gym.), Protea examina (ang.), Punica granatum (ang.), Greyia sutherlandii (ang.), Osmunda regalis (fn.), Colocasia esculenta (ang.), Pelargonium ‘Robert Fish’ (ang.), Drimys winteri (ang.), Citrus sinensis (ang.), Laurus nobilis (ang.), Ceratonia siliqua (ang.), Olea europea (ang.), Manihot esculenta (ang.), Ricinus communis (ang.). Regression line (blue) is a second order polynomial between g max and D v (r 2 = 0.741; y = 27.574x 2 − 93.365x + 512.84). Small black dots are statistical outlier g op values. g op boxplots illustrate the 25% and 75% quartiles (top and bottom of box), median values (horizontal bar) and whiskers represent 2nd and 98th percentiles for each species based on between 42 and 72 individual measurements. (b) Inset figure illustrates the theoretical expansion of ecophysiological (g op) space (grey horizontal bars) with increasing g max and D v. Solid line is mean g max for D v 0–3, > 3–5, > 5–7 and > 7–9 mm mm−2.
Figure 3Examination of relationships between stomatal conductance and assimilation. (a) Assimilation rate (A) vs operational stomatal conductance (g op, coloured symbols) and maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (g max, red arrow) collected in 2011 and 2012 for a range of species with low (≤ 1.00 mm mm−2), medium (> 1–3.5 mm mm−2) and high (> 5.0 mm mm−2) vein densities (D v). See Table 2 for r 2 values and trendline equations for each species. (b) Illustrates potential pathways to increasing assimilation rate. A–C would take place on evolutionary timescales, whereas A–B can occur within the lifetime of an individual plant by increasing stomatal density and/or pore geometry. (c) A comparison of the relationships between measured A sat (± standard deviation) and g max (A sat = 0.0092, g max, r 2 = 0.896), estimated saturated assimilation rate (tA sat) and g max (tA sat = 0.009 G max + 5.972, r 2 = 0.8766) and measured A max and g max (A max = 0.0026 G max + 15.109, r 2 = 0.0566). Inset figure (d) is a stylized representation of data in (c) illustrating that low g max would likely not have imposed a diffusional limitation on assimilation rate in the high CO 2 world of early Cretaceous (c. 2000 ppm) but would likely induce a severe diffusional limitation by the late Cretaceous when CO 2 levels had dropped to levels close to modern ambient (c. 400 ppm).