Christiano Saliba Uliana1, Marcelo Abagge1, Osvaldo Malafaia2, Faruk Abrão Kalil Filho3, Luiz Antonio Munhoz da Cunha3. 1. Hospital do Trabalhador, Curitiba, PR, Brazil ; Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 2. Faculdade Evangélica do Paraná, Hospital Universitário Evangélico de Curitiba, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 3. Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Correlation of the data evaluated on each patient with a transtrochanteric fracture: patient's data, history-taking, fracture classification, treatment conditions and hospital discharge.
Patient's data
History-taking
Classification
Treatment
Hospital discharge
Sex
Intensity of pain
Evans–Jensen
Surgical access
Weight-bearing permitted
Ethnicity
Trauma mechanism
AO/OTA
Implants used
Age
Level of fall
Tronzo
Complications during hospital stay
Associated chronic diseases
Deaths during hospital stay
The data on the patients were gathered by means of an interview, directly with the individual or with his parents and/or with the rescue team.Among the historical clinical data, the pain intensity was evaluated on numerical and verbal scales. On the numerical scale, the patient was encouraged to quantify his pain between zero and 10. Absence of pain was scored as zero and the worst pain ever experienced by the patient was scored as 10. On the verbal scale, patients were asked to classify their pain between five categories: intolerable, intense, moderate, mild and absent.13, 14 The mechanism through which patients suffered their trauma was stated both by the patient and by the pre-hospital rescue team. This item was subdivided into “traffic accident”, “fall”, “physical aggression” and “gunshot wound”. The level of the fall was divided into “fall from the same level” and “fall from a height”. In the case of falls from a height, the height of the fall in meters was evaluated. In taking the history, the patients were asked about the presence of any chronic diseases that they knew about, such as systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and cerebrovascular diseases.The fractures were classified by the first author based on radiographic analysis. The Evans–Jensen, AO/OTA and Tronzo classification systems were used.Regarding the treatment, a traction table was used to reduce the fracture in all cases. Only in cases in which the reduction on the traction table was unsatisfactory was it decided to perform direct reduction of the fracture. To stabilize the fracture, three surgical accesses were used: a lateral access below the vastus was used in cases of fixation with a plate and sliding screw; a lateral minimally invasive access proximal to the greater trochanter was used in cases of fixation with a cephalomedullary nail; and, in cases in which direct reduction was necessary, the access previous programmed was extended so as to expose the focus of the fracture, independent of the type of implant used. The implants used for fixation of the fractures were: sliding plate–screw, short or long cephalomedullary nail and 95° plate–screw. The clinical and orthopedic complications and the deaths that occurred during hospitalization were recorded.At the time of hospital discharge, data relating to the type of weight-bearing that the patient was allowed (none, partial or full) were gathered.
Results
The sample consisted of 43 men (39.45%) and 66 women (60.55%). Their ages ranged from 20 to 105 years, with a mean of 69. The mean among the men was 64.3 years (20–105), which was younger than the mean among the women of 70.3 years (20–104). Among the 109 patients of the sample, 90 (82.5%) were more than 54 years of age at the time of the fracture. Regarding ethnicity, 100 patients were white, two were black, two were mixed and five were classified as indeterminate (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Distribution according to sex, ethnicity and age group among the 109 patients of the sample.
The numerical scale showed that the greatest number of the patients reported pain at level 10 (30.28%), followed by pain at level 9 (26.61%) and level 8 (22.94%) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Representation of pain intensity reported by the patients at the time of admission, according to the numerical pain scale.
The verbal scale demonstrated that the majority of the patients classified their pain as “intense” (53.21%), followed by those who considered that their pain was “intolerable” (30.28%) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Representation of pain intensity reported by the patients at the time of admission, according to the verbal pain scale.
Falls were the most prevalent trauma mechanism and occurred in 92 patients (84.40%), followed by traffic accidents in 17 (15.6%) (Table 2).
Table 2
Trauma mechanism that gave rise to the fracture, subdivided into “fall”, “traffic accident”, “physical aggression” and “gunshot wound”.
Trauma mechanism
Number of patients
Fall
92 (84.40%)
Traffic accident
17 (15.6%)
Physical aggression
0 (0.00%)
Gunshot wound
0 (0.00%)
Among the patients who suffered falls, 85 (92.39%) fell from the same level, while seven (7.60%) fell from a height (Table 3).
Table 3
Sample distribution according to the level of the fall that gave rise to the fracture.
Level of fall
Number of patients
Same level
85 (92.39%)
1–2 m
2 (2.17%)
2–3 m
4 (4.34%)
3–4 m
0 (0.00%)
>4 m
1 (1.08%)
Systemic arterial hypertension was the chronic disease of greatest prevalence in the sample, reported by 55 patients (50.45%). Diabetes mellitus was the second most prevalent disease in the sample, affecting 21 patients (19.26%). Other diseases reported included cerebrovascular diseases, cardiopathies, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic renal disease. Table 4 shows the prevalence of the diseases and does not take into account the fact that some patients presented more than one comorbidity.
Table 4
Distribution of the chronic diseases presented by the patients of this sample.
Associated chronic diseases
Number of patients
Systemic arterial hypertension
55 (50.45%)
Diabetes mellitus
21 (19.26%)
Cardiopathies
12 (11%)
Cerebrovascular disease
16 (14.67%)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
2 (1.83%)
Chronic renal disease
1 (0.92%)
In relation to the Evans–Jensen classification, 60 patients (55%) presented type I fractures, followed by type II fractures in 35 patients (22%) and type III fractures in 14 patients (12%) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Percentage distribution of the fractures according to the Evans–Jensen classification.
According to the AO/OTA classification, the commonest type was 31 A1, which was found in 45 patients (41%), followed by type 31 A2, in 40 (36%), and type III, in 24 (22%) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5
Percentage distribution of the fractures according to the AO/OTA classification.
Regarding the Tronzo classification, type III was the commonest and affected 48 patients (44%). The second commonest was type II, in 23 (21.1%) (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6
Percentage distribution of the fractures according to the Tronzo classification.
Regarding the surgical approach, a limited minimally invasive access proximal to the greater trochanter was the approach most used (56.88%), followed by a lateral access below the vastus (40.36%) (Table 5).
Table 5
Distribution of accesses used for fracture fixation.
Surgical access
Number of patients
Limited minimally invasive proximal to greater trochanter
62 (56.88%)
Lateral below vastus
44 (40.36%)
Extended for direct reduction
3 (2.75%)
The implants used for fixation of the fracture were a sliding plate and screw in 44 cases (40%), a short cephalomedullary nail in 43 (40%), a long cephalomedullary nail in 21 (19%) and a 95° plate and screw in one (1%) (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7
Percentage distribution of the implants used for fracture fixation.
In all the 109 patients studied, 82 (75%) did not present any type of complication during the hospital stay. Among the 20 (18%) who presented local complications, 16 (15%) evolved with superficial infection, three (3%) evolved with deep infection and one (1%) presented a fracture of the lateral cortical bone of the femur during the operation. In this case, in which fixation using a sliding plate and screw had been planned, the surgeon decided to change the plan and perform the fixation using a 95° plate and screw. A further seven patients (7%) presented clinical intercurrences during the hospital stay (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8
Percentage incidence of complications presented by the patients during hospital stay.
During the hospital stay, three patients (2.75%) evolved to death and 106 (97.25%) were discharged from hospital (Fig. 9).
Fig. 9
Relationship between deaths during hospital stay and patients who were discharged.
For all the 106 patients (97.25%) who were discharged from hospital, it was recommended that they should only partially bear weight on the limb (Fig. 10).
Fig. 10
Demonstration that 106 patients who were discharged from hospital were instructed to only place partial weight on the fractured limb.
Authors: Christophe Sadowski; Anne Lübbeke; Marc Saudan; Nicolas Riand; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Paul R T Kuzyk; Joel Lobo; Daniel Whelan; Rad Zdero; Michael D McKee; Emil H Schemitsch Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Elton João Nunes de Oliveira; José Octávio Soares Hungria; Davi Gabriel Bellan; Jonas Aparecido Borracini Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2015-08-01
Authors: Eric Fernando de Souza; José Octávio Soares Hungria; Lucas Romano Sampaio Rezende; Davi Gabriel Bellan; Jonas Aparecido Borracini Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2016-12-14