Literature DB >> 26229366

Effect of Post Material and Length on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars: An In-Vitro Study.

G S Amarnath1, M U Swetha2, B C Muddugangadhar3, Radhika Sonika4, Ashu Garg4, T R Poonam Rao4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endodontically treated teeth with posts are more prone to fracture. Hence, the purpose of this study was to investigate the in-vitro fracture resistance of devitalized teeth and mode of failure restored with posts of different materials and different lengths.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty freshly extracted human mandibular premolars were endodontically treated and then restored with 1 of 2 prefabricated posts: Stainless-steel (SS) and glass-fiber (fiber posts [FP]) with intraradicular lengths of 4, 5 or 10 mm (n = 10). Following core restoration, a static compressive load was applied perpendicular to the long-axis of the teeth. Initial failure of each specimen was recorded in Newton. The mode of failure was also determined radiographically. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni adjustment.
RESULTS: Analysis indicated significant differences (P < 0.001) among the groups. Among the SS posts, SS/7 (246 N) exhibited the highest failure load and SS/4 (122 N) the lowest. FP/10 (140.5 N) exhibited the highest failure load among the FP and FP/4 (68.5 N) the lowest. SS posts showed post pull out, followed by core fracture while FP showed core debonding, followed by core fracture as the primary mode of failure.
CONCLUSION: Fracture resistance of the teeth proportionately increased with increase in the length of FP while it decreased with that of metal post. SS posts showed greater fracture resistance than FP when 90° load was applied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elastic modulus; fiber post; fracture resistance; mode of failure; stainless-steel

Year:  2015        PMID: 26229366      PMCID: PMC4513771     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Oral Health        ISSN: 0976-1799


  20 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review.

Authors:  A S Fernandes; G S Dessai
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.

Authors:  J Nissan; Y Dmitry; D Assif
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Fibre-based post systems: a review.

Authors:  G Bateman; D N J Ricketts; W P Saunders
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2003-07-12       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Clinical evaluation of a carbon fibre reinforced carbon endodontic post.

Authors:  P A King; D J Setchell; J S Rees
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro.

Authors:  S-O Hedlund; N G Johansson; G Sjögren
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Premolars restored with posts of different materials: fatigue analysis.

Authors:  Pablo-Jesús Rodríguez-Cervantes; Joaquín-Luis Sancho-Bru; Carmen González-Lluch; Antonio Pérez-González; Amaya Barjau-Escribano; Leopoldo Forner-Navarro
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  In vitro fracture resistance of glass-fiber and cast metal posts with different lengths.

Authors:  Alessandro Rogério Giovani; Luiz Pascoal Vansan; Manoel Damião de Sousa Neto; Silvana Maria Paulino
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Comparison of fracture resistance of bonded glass fiber posts at different lengths.

Authors:  Remo Schiavetti; Franklin García-Godoy; Manuel Toledano; Claudia Mazzitelli; Alberto Barlattani; Marco Ferrari; Raquel Osorio
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.522

9.  Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics.

Authors:  Charles J Goodacre; Guillermo Bernal; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Joseph Y K Kan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Comparison of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts and composite resin cores with different post lengths.

Authors:  Accácio Lins do Valle; Jefferson Ricardo Pereira; Fábio Kenji Shiratori; Luiz Fernando Pegoraro; Gerson Bonfante
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.698

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of fiber post length and abutment height on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars prepared for zirconia crowns.

Authors:  Jie Lin; Jukka Pekka Matinlinna; Akikazu Shinya; Michael George Botelho; Zhiqiang Zheng
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with a Longer Single Post and Shorter Double Posts of Different Sizes: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Arun Mayya; Rajaram Naik; Shreemathi S Mayya; Maria P Paul
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-04-20

3.  Comparison of the Effect for Fracture Resistance of Different Coronally Extended Post Length with Two Different Post Materials.

Authors:  Niharika Singh Chauhan; Nidhi Saraswat; Ankita Parashar; Kuldeep Singh Sandu; Kapil Jhajharia; Nirav Rabadiya
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2019-04-12

4.  Root canal reconstruction using biological dentin posts: A 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Seda Falakaloğlu; Özkan Adıgüzel; Gökhan Özdemir
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019

5.  Does Multi-Fiber-Reinforced Composite-Post Influence the Filling Ability and the Bond Strength in Root Canal?

Authors:  Naji Kharouf; Salvatore Sauro; Hamdi Jmal; Ammar Eid; Mohamed Karrout; Nadia Bahlouli; Youssef Haikel; Davide Mancino
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.