Literature DB >> 26228014

Is a Colectomy Always Just a Colectomy? Additional Procedures as a Proxy for Operative Complexity.

Kristina D Simmons1, Rebecca L Hoffman1, Lindsay E Kuo1, Edmund K Bartlett1, Daniel N Holena1, Rachel R Kelz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of surgical outcomes can be confounded by operative complexity. Complexity is difficult to assess from claims data due to the absence of established measures, but information on additional procedures is typically available. We hypothesized that analyzing same-day procedures (SDPs) would provide a useful step toward including operative complexity in risk adjustment. STUDY
DESIGN: Colon resections were identified in California, Florida, and New York (2008 to 2011). Same-day procedures were categorized using 6 definitions. In-hospital mortality and postoperative complications were examined. For all outcomes, we developed multivariable logistic regression models to measure the association between the SDP category and outcomes.
RESULTS: Rates of SDP were 74.9% total, 69.5% surgical, 31.6% nonsurgical, 36.6% colon, 51.4% abdomen, and 34.3% other for the 215,041 colon resections examined. Mortality was associated with the inclusion of any SDP category in univariate (6.2% vs 1.7%; p < 0.001) and multivariable (odds ratio [OR] = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.99-2.30; p < 0.001) analysis. The association with mortality was high for nonsurgical (OR = 2.36; 95% CI, 2.26-2.46) and other (OR = 2.33; 95% CI, 2.23-2.43) procedures and moderate for surgical (OR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.37-1.54) and colon (OR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.44-1.57) procedures, but abdominal procedures were not independently associated with mortality (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97-1.06). The total number of SDPs was also associated with higher complication rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of complications and mortality associated with colectomy was increased among patients with SDPs and the magnitude of the association was dependent on the type and quantity of additional procedures. Information on SDPs might reflect a component of operative risk not typically captured and should be considered as a candidate variable for risk adjustment when using claims to compare outcomes across large cohorts.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26228014      PMCID: PMC5803186          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  10 in total

1.  Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  E W Steyerberg; F E Harrell; G J Borsboom; M J Eijkemans; Y Vergouwe; J D Habbema
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Validity of procedure codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Gerry A Parsons; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric: a phase 1 report.

Authors:  Mehul V Raval; Peter W Dillon; Jennifer L Bruny; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall; R Lawrence Moss; Keith T Oldham; Karen E Richards; Charles D Vinocur; Moritz M Ziegler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Effect of cancer surgery complexity on short-term outcomes, risk predictions, and hospital comparisons.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; David J Bentrem; Mark E Cohen; Jennifer L Paruch; Sharon M Weber; Clifford Y Ko; Karl Y Bilimoria
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection.

Authors:  J Belghiti; K Hiramatsu; S Benoist; P Massault; A Sauvanet; O Farges
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score.

Authors:  Mehul V Raval; Mark E Cohen; Angela M Ingraham; Justin B Dimick; Nicholas H Osborne; Barton H Hamilton; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Simultaneous resections of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Srinevas K Reddy; Timothy M Pawlik; Daria Zorzi; Ana L Gleisner; Dario Ribero; Lia Assumpcao; Andrew S Barbas; Eddie K Abdalla; Michael A Choti; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Kirk A Ludwig; Christopher R Mantyh; Michael A Morse; Bryan M Clary
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Systematic review of comorbidity indices for administrative data.

Authors:  Mansour T A Sharabiani; Paul Aylin; Alex Bottle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Robotic versus laparoscopic elective colectomy for left side diverticulitis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Mohammed H Al-Temimi; Bindupriya Chandrasekaran; Johan Agapian; Walter R Peters; Katrina O Wells
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A National Comparison of Operative Outcomes of New and Experienced Surgeons.

Authors:  Rachel R Kelz; Morgan M Sellers; Bijan A Niknam; James E Sharpe; Paul R Rosenbaum; Alexander S Hill; Hong Zhou; Lauren L Hochman; Karl Y Bilimoria; Kamal Itani; Patrick S Romano; Jeffrey H Silber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 13.787

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.