Literature DB >> 23830986

Effect of cancer surgery complexity on short-term outcomes, risk predictions, and hospital comparisons.

Ryan P Merkow1, David J Bentrem, Mark E Cohen, Jennifer L Paruch, Sharon M Weber, Clifford Y Ko, Karl Y Bilimoria.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern exists that oncologic surgical complexity is not adequately captured by the primary procedure code alone. Our objectives were to characterize the association between secondary procedures and 30-day outcomes, evaluate the effect of surgical complexity on risk predictions, and assess the influence of surgical complexity on hospital-quality comparisons. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients who underwent colon, rectal, or pancreatic resection for cancer (2007-2011) were identified from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. Complexity was assessed by creating categorical complexity variables using secondary procedure codes and using total work relative value units. Regression methods were used to evaluate surgical complexity and hospital-quality comparisons.
RESULTS: Patients had at least one secondary procedure documented in 48.0% of colon, 55.5% of rectal, and 63.1% of pancreatic cases. Surgical complexity variables were associated with worse outcomes across nearly all complications assessed. For example, serious morbidity was increased after an index colon resection with a synchronous liver resection (odds ratio = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.76) and a pancreatic resection with vascular reconstruction (odds ratio = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45). Based on discrimination improvement indices and the likelihood ratio test, model-based predictions were enhanced with the addition of secondary surgical complexity variables, as well as total work relative value units, for nearly all procedures and outcomes assessed. Models that included total work relative value units had similar or marginally better discrimination compared with models with secondary procedure categories. Hospital performance did not change substantially after complexity adjustment.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complexity adjustment is feasible and improves risk estimation of 30-day postoperative outcomes for colon, rectal, and pancreatic resections for cancer. Oncology-specific risk-adjustment models should include complexity adjustment using secondary procedure codes.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACS; American College of Surgeons; IDI; LOS; NRI; ONNCC; OR; Oncology NSQIP National Cancer Institute Center Consortium; RVU; SSI; VTE; integrated discrimination improvement; length of stay; net reclassification index; odds ratio; relative value unit; surgical site infection; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23830986     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of the Risk Analysis Index for Prediction of Mortality, Major Complications, and Length of Stay in Patients who Underwent Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Kara A Rothenberg; Elizabeth L George; Amber W Trickey; Nicolas B Barreto; Theodore M Johnson; Daniel E Hall; Jason M Johanning; Shipra Arya
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 1.466

2.  Perioperative blood transfusion in gynecologic oncology surgery: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Authors:  Lauren S Prescott; Thomas A Aloia; Alaina J Brown; Jolyn S Taylor; Mark F Munsell; Charlotte C Sun; Kathleen M Schmeler; Charles F Levenback; Diane C Bodurka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  The independent effect of cancer on outcomes: a potential limitation of surgical risk prediction.

Authors:  Ira L Leeds; Joseph K Canner; Jonathan E Efron; Nita Ahuja; Elliott R Haut; Elizabeth C Wick; Fabian M Johnston
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity.

Authors:  Kevin R Kasten; Adam C Celio; Lauren Trakimas; Mark L Manwaring; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Is a Colectomy Always Just a Colectomy? Additional Procedures as a Proxy for Operative Complexity.

Authors:  Kristina D Simmons; Rebecca L Hoffman; Lindsay E Kuo; Edmund K Bartlett; Daniel N Holena; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Association of Health Literacy With Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Jesse P Wright; Gretchen C Edwards; Kathryn Goggins; Vikram Tiwari; Amelia Maiga; Kelvin Moses; Sunil Kripalani; Kamran Idrees
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Implementation of a hospital-based quality assessment program for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren; Ellen McKeown; Arden M Morris; Sandra L Wong; Mary Oerline; Lyndia Poe; Darrell A Campbell; Nancy J Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Economic burden of cancer among patients with surgical resections of the lung, rectum, liver and uterus: results from a US hospital database claims analysis.

Authors:  Iftekhar Kalsekar; Chia-Wen Hsiao; Hang Cheng; Sashi Yadalam; Brian Po-Han Chen; Laura Goldstein; Andrew Yoo
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-06-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.