Levent Kabasakal1, Mohammad AbuQbeitah2, Aslan Aygün2, Nami Yeyin2, Meltem Ocak3, Emre Demirci4, Turkay Toklu5. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. lkabasakal@tsnm.org. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Pharmacy Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yeditepe University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: (177)Lu-617-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand seems to be a promising tracer for radionuclide therapy of progressive prostate cancer. However, there are no published data regarding the radiation dose given to the normal tissues. The aim of the present study was to estimate the pretreatment radiation doses in patients who will undergo radiometabolic therapy using a tracer amount of (177)Lu-labeled PSMA ligand. METHODS: The study included seven patients with progressive prostate cancer with a mean age of 63.9 ± 3.9 years. All patients had prior PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and had intense tracer uptake at the lesions. The injected (177)Lu-PSMA-617 activity ranged from 185 to 210 MBq with a mean of 192.6 ± 11.0 MBq. To evaluate bone marrow absorbed dose 2-cc blood samples were withdrawn in short variable times (3, 15, 30, 60, and 180 min and 24, 48, and 120 h) after injection. Whole-body images were obtained at 4, 24, 48, and 120 h post-injection (p.i.). The geometric mean of anterior and posterior counts was determined through region of interest (ROI) analysis. Attenuation correction was applied using PSMA PET/CT images. The OLINDA/EXM dosimetry program was used for curve fitting, residence time calculation, and absorbed dose calculations. RESULTS: The calculated radiation-absorbed doses for each organ showed substantial variation. The highest radiation estimated doses were calculated for parotid glands and kidneys. Calculated radiation-absorbed doses per megabecquerel were 1.17 ± 0.31 mGy for parotid glands and 0.88 ± 0.40 mGy for kidneys. The radiation dose given to the bone marrow was significantly lower than those of kidney and parotid glands (p < 0.05). The calculated radiation dose to bone marrow was 0.03 ± 0.01 mGy/MBq. CONCLUSION: Our first results suggested that (177)Lu-PSMA-617 therapy seems to be a safe method. The dose-limiting organ seems to be the parotid glands rather than kidneys and bone marrow. The lesion radiation doses are within acceptable ranges; however, there is a substantial individual variance so patient dosimetry seems to be mandatory.
PURPOSE: (177)Lu-617-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand seems to be a promising tracer for radionuclide therapy of progressive prostate cancer. However, there are no published data regarding the radiation dose given to the normal tissues. The aim of the present study was to estimate the pretreatment radiation doses in patients who will undergo radiometabolic therapy using a tracer amount of (177)Lu-labeled PSMA ligand. METHODS: The study included seven patients with progressive prostate cancer with a mean age of 63.9 ± 3.9 years. All patients had prior PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and had intense tracer uptake at the lesions. The injected (177)Lu-PSMA-617 activity ranged from 185 to 210 MBq with a mean of 192.6 ± 11.0 MBq. To evaluate bone marrow absorbed dose 2-cc blood samples were withdrawn in short variable times (3, 15, 30, 60, and 180 min and 24, 48, and 120 h) after injection. Whole-body images were obtained at 4, 24, 48, and 120 h post-injection (p.i.). The geometric mean of anterior and posterior counts was determined through region of interest (ROI) analysis. Attenuation correction was applied using PSMA PET/CT images. The OLINDA/EXM dosimetry program was used for curve fitting, residence time calculation, and absorbed dose calculations. RESULTS: The calculated radiation-absorbed doses for each organ showed substantial variation. The highest radiation estimated doses were calculated for parotid glands and kidneys. Calculated radiation-absorbed doses per megabecquerel were 1.17 ± 0.31 mGy for parotid glands and 0.88 ± 0.40 mGy for kidneys. The radiation dose given to the bone marrow was significantly lower than those of kidney and parotid glands (p < 0.05). The calculated radiation dose to bone marrow was 0.03 ± 0.01 mGy/MBq. CONCLUSION: Our first results suggested that (177)Lu-PSMA-617 therapy seems to be a safe method. The dose-limiting organ seems to be the parotid glands rather than kidneys and bone marrow. The lesion radiation doses are within acceptable ranges; however, there is a substantial individual variance so patient dosimetry seems to be mandatory.
Authors: Michael Garkavij; Mattias Nickel; Katarina Sjögreen-Gleisner; Michael Ljungberg; Tomas Ohlsson; Karin Wingårdh; Sven-Erik Strand; Jan Tennvall Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Martina Benešová; Martin Schäfer; Ulrike Bauder-Wüst; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Clemens Kratochwil; Walter Mier; Uwe Haberkorn; Klaus Kopka; Matthias Eder Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: D J Kwekkeboom; W H Bakker; P P Kooij; M W Konijnenberg; A Srinivasan; J L Erion; M A Schmidt; J L Bugaj; M de Jong; E P Krenning Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Date: 2001-09
Authors: A Afshar-Oromieh; A Malcher; M Eder; M Eisenhut; H G Linhart; B A Hadaschik; T Holland-Letz; F L Giesel; C Kratochwil; S Haufe; U Haberkorn; C M Zechmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-11-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Flavio Forrer; Eric P Krenning; Peter P Kooij; Bert F Bernard; Mark Konijnenberg; Willem H Bakker; Jaap J M Teunissen; Marion de Jong; Kirsten van Lom; Wouter W de Herder; Dik J Kwekkeboom Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Johanna Svensson; Gertrud Berg; Bo Wängberg; Maria Larsson; Eva Forssell-Aronsson; Peter Bernhardt Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: A Pfestroff; M Luster; C A Jilg; P J Olbert; C H Ohlmann; M Lassmann; H R Maecke; S Ezziddin; L Bodei Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Karine Sahakyan; Xin Li; Martin A Lodge; Rudolf A Werner; Ralph A Bundschuh; Lena Bundschuh; Harshad R Kulkarni; Christiane Schuchardt; Richard P Baum; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin G Pomper; Ashley E Ross; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Jens Kurth; Bernd Joachim Krause; Sarah M Schwarzenböck; Carina Bergner; Oliver W Hakenberg; Martin Heuschkel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Joseph R Osborne; Teja M Kalidindi; Blesida J Punzalan; Kishore Gangangari; Daniel E Spratt; Wolfgang A Weber; Steven M Larson; Naga Vara Kishore Pillarsetty Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: James J Vornov; Diane Peters; Mike Nedelcovych; Kristen Hollinger; Rana Rais; Barbara S Slusher Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 3.996