| Literature DB >> 26226487 |
Babak Asadi Azarbaijani1, Mona Sheikhi2, Irma C Oskam3, Mirja Nurmio4, Tiina Laine5, Helena Tinkanen6, Sirpa Mäkinen7, Tom G Tanbo1, Outi Hovatta8, Kirsi Jahnukainen9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue has been widely accepted as an option for fertility preservation among cancer patients. Some patients are exposed to chemotherapy prior to ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Consequently, assessment of the developmental capacity of human ovarian tissue after chemotherapy is of primary importance. MATERIALS: In order to study the impact of previous chemotherapy on in vitro development and viability of ovarian follicles, quality control samples from 34 female cancer patients at median age of 15 years (range 1‒35), cryopreserved for fertility preservation before (n = 14) or after (n = 20) initiation of chemotherapy, were thawed and cultured for 7 days. The morphology and developmental stages of ovarian follicles were studied by light microscopy before and after culture. Possible associations between follicular densities, age and exposure to alkylating agents, expressed as cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED) were tested.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26226487 PMCID: PMC4520548 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Controls and cancer patients who underwent biopsy before or after chemotherapy.
| ID | Age (y) | Cryo-protectant | Cancer diagnosis | CED | Interval form last chemotherapy to ovarian biopsy (day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 1 | 32 | PrOH | - | - | - |
| 2 | 36 | PrOH | - | - | - |
| 3 | 33 | PrOH | - | - | - |
| 4 | 31 | PrOH | - | - | - |
|
| |||||
| 5 | 15 | PrOH | Neuroblastoma | - | - |
| 6 | 12 | EG | Ewing Sarcoma | - | - |
| 7 | 24 | EG | Ewing Sarcoma | - | - |
| 8 | 16 | EG | Osteosarcoma | - | - |
| 9 | 19 | PrOH | Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma | - | - |
| 10 | 20 | EG | Hodgkin Lymphoma | - | - |
| 11 | 23 | EG | Hodgkin Lymphoma | - | - |
| 12 | 14 | EG | Hodgkin Lymphoma | - | - |
| 13 | 22 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | - | - |
| 14 | 15 | PrOH | Burkitt’s Lymphoma | - | - |
| 15 | 35 | PrOH | Acute Myeloid Leukemia | - | - |
| 16 | 15 | PrOH | Aplastic Anemia | - | - |
| 17 | 19 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | - | - |
| 18 | 19 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | - | - |
|
| |||||
| 19 | 3 | PrOH | Neuroblastoma | 7000 | 14 |
| 20 | 1 | PrOH | Neuroblastoma | 16640 | 55 |
| 21 | 2 | PrOH | Neuroblastoma | 7200 | 30 |
| 22 | 12 | PrOH | Ewing Sarcoma | 31560 | 21 |
| 23 | 10 | EG | Rhabdomyosarcoma | 8540 | 14 |
| 24 | 15 | PrOH | Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma | 4100 | 18 |
| 25 | 20 | PrOH | Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma | 6200 | 35 |
| 26 | 1 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 2000 | 28 |
| 27 | 9 | EG | Burkitt’s Lymphoma | 4300 | 20 |
| 28 | 11 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 6000 | 21 |
| 29 | 16 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 2000 | 18 |
| 30 | 5 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 3600 | 11 |
| 31 | 5 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 4000 | 17 |
| 32 | 13 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 4684 | 30 |
| 33 | 6 | PrOH | Acute Myeloid Leukemia | 0 | 30 |
| 34 | 15 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 7300 | 9 |
| 35 | 7 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 4400 | 50 |
| 36 | 24 | EG | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 4800 | 21 |
| 37 | 8 | PrOH | Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia | 6000 | 30 |
| 38 | 5 | PrOH | Rhabdomyosarcoma | 10248 | 17 |
PrOH = propanediol, EG = ethylene glycol
aExposure to alkylating agents is indicated by cumulative Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose (CED).
bTreated with non-alkylating agents,
Fig 1Representative images of ovarian cortex before and after seven days of culture (magnification ×40), from a 15-year-old girl with lymphoma and no chemotherapy (A,B), and from a 2-year-old girl with neuroblastoma exposed to CED of 7200 mg/m2 (C,D).
a) Intact primordial follicle, b) intact secondary follicle, c) influenced primordial follicle, d) atretic follicle.
Median and interquartile range (IQR) of follicle densities in cryopreserved human ovarian tissue before and after seven days of culture.
| No chemotherapy n = 14 Median (IQR) | Chemotherapy n = 20 Median (IQR) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 19.0 (7.3) | 8.5 (9.5) |
|
| CED | 0.0 | 5400 (3250) |
|
|
| |||
| Total follicles | 155 (179) | 263 (569) | 0.194 |
| Intact | 103 (110) | 85 (148) | 0.434 |
| Influenced | 5 (37) | 26 (75) | 0.128 |
| Atretic | 0 (27) | 74 (305) |
|
| Primordial | 76 (86) | 98 (183) | 0.957 |
| Intermediary | 20 (41) | 23 (43) | 0.372 |
| Primary | 15 (11) | 4 (9) |
|
| Secondary | 0 (2) | 0 (0) | 0.785 |
|
| |||
| Total follicles | 67 (103) | 297 (417) |
|
| Intact | 11 (34) | 2 (9) |
|
| Influenced | 7 (32) | 6 (16) | 0.500 |
| Atretic | 42 (64) | 291 (407) |
|
| Primordial | 9 (19) | 5 (14) | 0.192 |
| Intermediary | 8 (16) | 2 (6) |
|
| Primary | 7 (18) | 0 (2) |
|
| Secondary | 1 (3) | 0 (0) |
|
a Cumulative Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose.
Fig 2Relationship between follicle density and age before and after seven days of culture in controls (circles) and cancer patients with (triangles) and without (squares) chemotherapy.
Spearman’s rank correlation analysis of age and cumulative Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose (CED) and their association with follicle densities after seven days of culture.
| Age | CED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| P-value |
| P-value | |
|
| ||||
| Total follicles | -0.362 |
| 0.342 | 0.052 |
| Intact follicles | -0.050 | 0.784 | 0.029 | 0.873 |
| Influenced follicles | -0.275 | 0.121 | 0.367 |
|
| Atretic follicles | -0.532 |
| 0.474 |
|
| Primordial follicles | -0.156 | 0.386 | 0.198 | 0.269 |
| Intermediary follicles | 0.345 |
| -0.328 | 0.062 |
| Primary follicles | 0.060 | 0.739 | -0.016 | 0.930 |
| Secondary follicles | -0.103 | 0.567 | -0.098 | 0.588 |
|
| ||||
| Total follicles | -0.563 |
| 0.345 |
|
| Intact follicles | 0.409 |
| -0.281 | 0.108 |
| Influenced follicles | 0.046 | 0.796 | -0.073 | 0.681 |
| Atretic follicles | -0.646 |
| 0.413 |
|
| Primordial follicles | 0.096 | 0.591 | -0.157 | 0.376 |
| Intermediary follicles | 0.590 |
| -0.439 |
|
| Primary follicles | 0.351 |
| -0.250 | 0.154 |
| Secondary follicles | 0.592 |
| -0.519 |
|
Rho = Spearman's rank correlation coefficient
Multivariate linear regression analysis of follicle densities using age, cumulative Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose (CED) and propanediol (PrOH) as predictors after 7 days of culture.
| Outcome variable | Predictor | B | SEB | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Total follicles | Age | -32.62 | 15.80 |
|
| R2 adj = 20% | CED | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.213 |
| PrOH | -11.59 | 259.30 | 0.965 | |
|
| ||||
| Total follicles | Age | -15.23 | 7.24 |
|
| R2 adj = 22% | CED | 0.02 | 0.01 |
|
| PrOH | 106,55 | 220.47 | 0.632 | |
| Atretic follicles | Age | -15.81 | 7.00 |
|
| R2 adj = 24% | CED | 0.03 | 0.01 |
|
| PrOH | 82,14 | 212.20 | 0.701 | |
| Primary follicles | Age | 0.66 | 0.22 |
|
| R2 adj = 12% | CED | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.473 |
| PrOH | -0.83 | 6.57 | 0.900 | |
| Secondary follicles | Age | 0.14 | 0.03 |
|
| R2 adj = 17% | CED | -0.00 | 0.00 | 0.590 |
| PrOH | -0.33 | 0.953 | 0.733 | |
B = Regression coefficient, SEB = Standard Error, R2 adj = Adjusted R-squared
Only significant differences are indicated.