Literature DB >> 26224818

Revision total hip arthroplasty using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components at a mean follow-up of 13 years (8 to 20): an update.

L B Solomon1, K Costi1, D Kosuge2, T Cordier1, M A McGee1, D W Howie1.   

Abstract

The outcome of 219 revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in 98 male and 121 female patients, using 137 long length and 82 standard length cemented collarless double-taper femoral stems in 211 patients, with a mean age of 72 years (30 to 90) and mean follow-up of six years (two to 18) have been described previously. We have extended the follow-up to a mean of 13 years (8 to 20) in this cohort of patients in which the pre-operative bone deficiency Paprosky grading was IIIA or worse in 79% and 73% of femurs with long and standard stems, respectively. For the long stem revision group, survival to re-revision for aseptic loosening at 14 years was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91 to 100) and in patients aged > 70 years, survival was 100%. Two patients (two revisions) were lost to follow-up and 86 patients with 88 revisions had died. Worst-case analysis for survival to re-revision for aseptic loosening at 14 years was 95% (95% CI 89 to 100) and 99% (95% CI 96 to 100) for patients aged > 70 years. One additional long stem was classified as loose radiographically but not revised. For the standard stem revision group, survival to re-revision for aseptic loosening at 14 years was 91% (95% CI 83 to 99). No patients were lost to follow-up and 49 patients with 51 hips had died. No additional stems were classified as loose radiographically. Femoral revision using a cemented collarless double-taper stem, particularly with a long length stem, and in patients aged > 70 years, continues to yield excellent results up to 20 years post-operatively, including in hips with considerable femoral metaphyseal bone loss. ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Revision total hip arthroplasty; Cemented stem; Collarless stem; Double-tapered stem; Polished stem

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26224818     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.34632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  4 in total

1.  Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yannick Herry; Anthony Viste; Hugo Bothorel; Romain Desmarchelier; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Experimental and Numerical Models of Complex Clinical Scenarios; Strategies to Improve Relevance and Reproducibility of Joint Replacement Research.

Authors:  Joan E Bechtold; Pascal Swider; Curtis Goreham-Voss; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Do Bone Graft and Cracking of the Sclerotic Cavity Improve Fixation of Titanium and Hydroxyapatite-coated Revision Implants in an Animal Model?

Authors:  Brian Elmengaard; Joergen Baas; Thomas Jakobsen; Soren Kold; Thomas B Jensen; Joan E Bechtold; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Differences between proximal bone remodeling in femoral revisions for aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fractures using the Wagner SL stem.

Authors:  Gábor Friebert; Csaba Gombár; András Bozó; Ilona Polyák; Ádám Brzózka; Krisztián Sisák
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.