Literature DB >> 26224754

Unequal Inequalities: The Stratification of the Use of Formal Care Among Older Europeans.

Marco Albertini1, Emmanuele Pavolini2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The general aim of the article is to incorporate the stratification perspective into the study of (long-term) care systems. In particular, 3 issues are investigated: the extents to which (a) personal and family resources influence the likelihood of using formal care in later life; (b) the unequal access to formal care is mediated by differences in the availability of informal support; (c) the relationship between individuals' resources and the use of formal care in old age varies across care regimes and is related to the institutional design of long-term care policies.
METHOD: Data from Waves 1 and 2 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe for 4 countries: Denmark, Germany, France, and Italy, and population aged at least 65 (N = 9,824) were used. Population-averaged logit models were used.
RESULTS: Logit models revealed that in terms of access to formal care: an individual's educational level plays a limited role; family networks function similarly across the countries studied; in general, financial wealth does not have a significant effect; there is a positive relation between income and the use of formal care in Germany and Italy, and no significant relation in France and Denmark; home ownership has a negative effect in Germany and Denmark. On accounting for informal care, inequality associated with individuals' economic resources remains substantially unaltered. DISCUSSION: The study shows that care systems based on services provision grant higher access to formal care and create lower inequalities. Moreover, countries where cash-for-care programs and family responsibilities are more important register inequalities in the use of formal care. Access to informal care does not mediate the distribution of formal care.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Care regimes; Europe; Formal care; Inequality; Long-term care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26224754      PMCID: PMC5927152          DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbv038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  1 in total

Review 1.  Mortality and morbidity trends: is there compression of morbidity?

Authors:  Eileen M Crimmins; Hiram Beltrán-Sánchez
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 4.077

  1 in total
  15 in total

1.  Educational Attainment Differences in Attitudes toward Provisions of IADL Care for Older Adults in the U.S.

Authors:  Sarah E Patterson
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2020-02-01

2.  Co-residence beliefs 1973-2018: Older adults feel differently than younger adults.

Authors:  Sarah E Patterson; Adriana M Reyes
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2022-01-21

3.  Determinants of formal care use and expenses among in-home elderly in Jing'an district, Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Fen Li; Xinye Fang; Jiechun Gao; Hansheng Ding; Changying Wang; Chunyan Xie; Yitong Yang; Chunlin Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Fairness and Eligibility to Long-Term Care: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Inequality and Inequity in the Use of Home Care for Older Europeans.

Authors:  Stefania Ilinca; Ricardo Rodrigues; Andrea E Schmidt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Individual and country-level determinants of nursing home admission in the last year of life in Europe.

Authors:  Erwin Stolz; Hannes Mayerl; Éva Rásky; Wolfgang Freidl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Actions to influence the care network of home-dwelling elderly people: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Wendy Kemper-Koebrugge; Marian Adriaansen; Miranda Laurant; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2019-01-13

7.  Obstacles to access to community care in urban senior-only households: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ni Gong; Ya Meng; Qin Hu; Qianqian Du; Xiaoyu Wu; Wenjie Zou; Mengyao Zhu; Jiayan Chen; Lan Luo; Yu Cheng; Meifen Zhang
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Social inequality and the risk of living in a nursing home: implications for the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Fabrizio Bernardi; Marco Cozzani; Francesca Zanasi
Journal:  Genus       Date:  2021-06-23

9.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe.

Authors:  Ginevra Floridi; Ludovico Carrino; Karen Glaser
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Care Arrangements of Older People with Limited Physical Abilities Living Alone in Italy.

Authors:  Maria Gabriella Melchiorre; Sabrina Quattrini; Giovanni Lamura; Marco Socci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.