Caroline Sievers1, Dorothee M Baur2, Anja Schwanke3, Michael Buchfelder4, Michael Droste5, Klaus Mann6, Günter K Stalla7. 1. Clinical Neuroendocrinology, Clinical Research Department, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804, Munich, Germany. csievers@mpipsykl.mpg.de. 2. II Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. 3. Endocrine Care, Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. 5. Endokrinologische Praxis, Oldenburg, Germany. 6. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Duisburg-Essen and Endokrinologiezentrum, Alter Hof, Munich, Germany. 7. Clinical Neuroendocrinology, Clinical Research Department, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed at investigating predicting factors for therapy response under growth hormone receptor antagonist therapy with a focus on subjective and patient-oriented measures. METHODS: Observational, multicenter nested-cohort study including 271 selected patients with the diagnosis of acromegaly and a minimum of one-year follow-up period within the German ACROSTUDY cohort (total cohort: n = 514). Outcome measures were the change of the biomarker IGF-1 (IGF-1 change and IGF-1 normalisation) between baseline and after 1 year of pegvisomant therapy (12 ± 6 months). Main predictors were patient-assessed subjective measures according to the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) in conjugation with age, gender, BMI, max. dosage of pegvisomant at follow-up and IGF-1 before the start of pegvisomant therapy. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 51.2 (13.9) years and the mean BMI was 29.5 (5.1) kg/m(2). In adjusted analyses, none of the individual perceived health (PASQ) scores, but age, BMI and IGF-1 at baseline were predictive for an IGF-1 decrease after 1 year of pegvisomant therapy and BMI and IGF-1, but equally none of the PASQ items, were predicting IGF-1 normalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Age, BMI and baseline IGF-1 but not subjective perceived health measures predict therapy response under second line medical therapy with pegvisomant.
PURPOSE: This study aimed at investigating predicting factors for therapy response under growth hormone receptor antagonist therapy with a focus on subjective and patient-oriented measures. METHODS: Observational, multicenter nested-cohort study including 271 selected patients with the diagnosis of acromegaly and a minimum of one-year follow-up period within the German ACROSTUDY cohort (total cohort: n = 514). Outcome measures were the change of the biomarker IGF-1 (IGF-1 change and IGF-1 normalisation) between baseline and after 1 year of pegvisomant therapy (12 ± 6 months). Main predictors were patient-assessed subjective measures according to the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) in conjugation with age, gender, BMI, max. dosage of pegvisomant at follow-up and IGF-1 before the start of pegvisomant therapy. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 51.2 (13.9) years and the mean BMI was 29.5 (5.1) kg/m(2). In adjusted analyses, none of the individual perceived health (PASQ) scores, but age, BMI and IGF-1 at baseline were predictive for an IGF-1 decrease after 1 year of pegvisomant therapy and BMI and IGF-1, but equally none of the PASQ items, were predicting IGF-1 normalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Age, BMI and baseline IGF-1 but not subjective perceived health measures predict therapy response under second line medical therapy with pegvisomant.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acromegaly; Growth hormone; Health-related quality of life; IGF-1; Pegvisomant
Authors: P Marzullo; C Di Somma; K L Pratt; J Khosravi; A Diamandis; G Lombardi; A Colao; R G Rosenfeld Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: S Melmed; F Casanueva; F Cavagnini; P Chanson; L A Frohman; R Gaillard; E Ghigo; K Ho; P Jaquet; D Kleinberg; S Lamberts; E Laws; G Lombardi; M C Sheppard; M Thorner; M L Vance; J A H Wass; A Giustina Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: John A Jane; Robert M Starke; Mohamed A Elzoghby; Davis L Reames; Spencer C Payne; Michael O Thorner; John C Marshall; Edward R Laws; Mary Lee Vance Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Michael Droste; Julia Domberg; Michael Buchfelder; Klaus Mann; Anja Schwanke; Günter Stalla; Christian J Strasburger Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: M Ragonese; S Grottoli; P Maffei; A Alibrandi; M R Ambrosio; G Arnaldi; A Bianchi; S Puglisi; M C Zatelli; L De Marinis; E Ghigo; A Giustina; F Maffezzoni; C Martini; L Trementino; S Cannavo Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-10-28 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Irene Gagliardi; Sabrina Chiloiro; Ana Gonçalves Ferreira; Marta Bondanelli; Antonella Giampietro; Antonio Bianchi; Laura De Marinis; Maria Fleseriu; Maria Chiara Zatelli Journal: Endocrine Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: A Giustina; G Arnaldi; F Bogazzi; S Cannavò; A Colao; L De Marinis; E De Menis; E Degli Uberti; F Giorgino; S Grottoli; A G Lania; P Maffei; R Pivonello; E Ghigo Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Shlomo Melmed; Marcello D Bronstein; Philippe Chanson; Anne Klibanski; Felipe F Casanueva; John A H Wass; Christian J Strasburger; Anton Luger; David R Clemmons; Andrea Giustina Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 43.330