Literature DB >> 26223953

[Shock wave lithotripsy in Germany: Results of a nationwide survey].

M J Schnabel1, W Brummeisl, M Burger, J J Rassweiler, T Knoll, A Neisius, C G Chaussy, H M Fritsche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following its introduction in the 1980s extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) became the gold standard for therapy of ureteral and renal calculi. The research data published during the last decade suggest a paradigm shift to endourological techniques.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare whether the suggested loss of status for SWL corresponds with actual real-life treatment in Germany. A further aim was to assess the quality of SWL therapy in German hospitals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The board of the German Society for Shock Wave Lithotripsy (DGSWL) sent a questionnaire to 306 urological departments in Germany, which encompassed medical, technical and organizational topics in the therapy of ureteral and renal calculi. A total of 99 (33%) questionnaires were returned.
CONCLUSION: With the exception of a few departments, non-invasive SWL still plays a major role in the treatment of urolithiasis and a loss of the gold standard status is not in sight. The performance of SWL in German hospitals is carried out at a high level of quality. To maintain and optimize this status a structured SWL training and adherence to clinical practice guidelines are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26223953     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-015-3920-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  17 in total

Review 1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Omar M Aboumarzouk; Slawomir G Kata; Francis X Keeley; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 2.  Miniperc: what is its current status?

Authors:  Ravindra B Sabnis; Raguram Ganesamoni; Rajeev Sarpal
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  [Inpatient therapy of urinary stones in Germany: development of the G-DRG system].

Authors:  J Bauer; A Kahlmeyer; R Stredele; B G Volkmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.

Authors:  Attasit Srisubat; Somkiat Potisat; Bannakij Lojanapiwat; Vasun Setthawong; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-24

Review 5.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Patient decision making for asymptomatic renal calculi: balancing benefit and risk.

Authors:  Carl Sarkissian; Mark Noble; Jianbo Li; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Evaluation of dose-related effects of aspirin on platelet function: results from the Aspirin-Induced Platelet Effect (ASPECT) study.

Authors:  Paul A Gurbel; Kevin P Bliden; Joseph DiChiara; Justin Newcomer; Willy Weng; Nagaraj K Neerchal; Tania Gesheff; Srivasavi K Chaganti; Amena Etherington; Udaya S Tantry
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; John Denstedt; Petrisor Geavlete; Francis Keeley; Tadashi Matsuda; Margaret Pearle; Glenn Preminger; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; W Brendel; E Schmiedt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Julie C Lai; Andrew W Dick; Jan M Hanley; Jeroen van Meijgaard; Claude M Setodji; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 14.766

View more
  2 in total

1.  Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Chandan Phukan; T J Nirmal; Cornerstone V Wann; J Chandrasingh; Santosh Kumar; Nitin S Kekre; Antony Devasia
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

2.  Trends in the treatment of urinary stone disease in Turkey.

Authors:  Kadir Yildirim; Mahmut Taha Olcucu; Muhammed Emre Colak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.