Ziad F Issa1,2, Bashar S Amr3. 1. Prairie Heart Institute, Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants, 619 East Mason Street, Springfield, IL, 62701, USA. zissa@prairieheart.com. 2. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA. zissa@prairieheart.com. 3. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) requires utilizing multiple venous femoral sheaths in conjunction with aggressive periprocedural anticoagulation, which can lead to increased risk of vascular access complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the "figure-of-eight" ("F-8") suture technique for femoral venous hemostasis while on therapeutic doses of intravenous anticoagulation at the time of sheath removal. METHODS: In this case-control analysis, 376 consecutive patients underwent AF ablation while on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation and received intraprocedural heparin. In the first 253 patients (the control group), manual pressure was used for femoral venous hemostasis after reversal of heparin effects. The subsequent 123 patients (the F-8 group) had femoral venous hemostasis using the F-8 suture technique and while under therapeutic heparin effects. RESULTS: The F-8 subcutaneous suture technique achieved adequate venous hemostasis in 98.4% of patients. As compared to the control group, there was significantly less frequent utilization of the FemoStop compression assist device (1.2 vs. 16.8%, p < 0.0001) and in a significantly shorter interval (6.8 ± 5.7 vs. 50.7 ± 12.2 min, p < 0.0001). Vascular access complications and thromboembolic events occurred in 9.8% in the F-8 group vs. 13.0% in the control group (p = 0.678). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate hemostasis of the femoral venous access sites after insertion of multiple sheaths for AF ablation in the presence of anticoagulation can be safely and effectively achieved using the F-8 suture technique. This technique helps minimize the period of inadequate anticoagulation immediately following ablation and shortens the time required to achieve adequate hemostasis.
PURPOSE: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) requires utilizing multiple venous femoral sheaths in conjunction with aggressive periprocedural anticoagulation, which can lead to increased risk of vascular access complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the "figure-of-eight" ("F-8") suture technique for femoral venous hemostasis while on therapeutic doses of intravenous anticoagulation at the time of sheath removal. METHODS: In this case-control analysis, 376 consecutive patients underwent AF ablation while on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation and received intraprocedural heparin. In the first 253 patients (the control group), manual pressure was used for femoral venous hemostasis after reversal of heparin effects. The subsequent 123 patients (the F-8 group) had femoral venous hemostasis using the F-8 suture technique and while under therapeutic heparin effects. RESULTS: The F-8 subcutaneous suture technique achieved adequate venous hemostasis in 98.4% of patients. As compared to the control group, there was significantly less frequent utilization of the FemoStop compression assist device (1.2 vs. 16.8%, p < 0.0001) and in a significantly shorter interval (6.8 ± 5.7 vs. 50.7 ± 12.2 min, p < 0.0001). Vascular access complications and thromboembolic events occurred in 9.8% in the F-8 group vs. 13.0% in the control group (p = 0.678). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate hemostasis of the femoral venous access sites after insertion of multiple sheaths for AF ablation in the presence of anticoagulation can be safely and effectively achieved using the F-8 suture technique. This technique helps minimize the period of inadequate anticoagulation immediately following ablation and shortens the time required to achieve adequate hemostasis.
Authors: Sandeep Gautam; Roy M John; William G Stevenson; Rahul Jain; Laurence M Epstein; Usha Tedrow; Bruce A Koplan; Seth McClennen; Gregory F Michaud Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2010-08-31
Authors: Oussama M Wazni; Salwa Beheiry; Tamer Fahmy; Conor Barrett; Steven Hao; Dimpi Patel; Luigi Di Biase; David O Martin; Mohamed Kanj; Mauricio Arruda; Jennifer Cummings; Robert Schweikert; Walid Saliba; Andrea Natale Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christine C Tanaka-Esposito; Mina K Chung; Joellyn M Abraham; Daniel J Cantillon; Bernard Abi-Saleh; Patrick J Tchou Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2013-04-14 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Mohamed Bassiouny; Walid Saliba; John Rickard; Mingyuan Shao; Albert Sey; Mariam Diab; David O Martin; Ayman Hussein; Maurice Khoury; Bernard Abi-Saleh; Samir Alam; Jay Sengupta; P Peter Borek; Bryan Baranowski; Mark Niebauer; Thomas Callahan; Niraj Varma; Mina Chung; Patrick J Tchou; Mohamed Kanj; Thomas Dresing; Bruce D Lindsay; Oussama Wazni Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-04-03
Authors: Benjamin L Freedman; Shu Yang; David Shim; Andre d'Avila; Jonathan W Waks; Patricia Tung Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2022-05-28 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Umashankar Lakshmanadoss; Wai Shun Wong; Ilana Kutinsky; M Rizwan Khalid; Brian Williamson; David E Haines Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2017-02-20