Benlong Shi1, Saihu Mao, Zhiwei Wang, Tsz Ping Lam, Fiona Wai Ping Yu, Bobby Kin Wah Ng, Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu, Zezhang Zhu, Yong Qiu, Jack Chun Yiu Cheng. 1. *Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China; †Joint Scoliosis Research Center of the Chinese University of Hong Kong & Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; ‡Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; and §Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To study how the supine magnetic resonance image (MRI) correlates with standing radiographs of different curve severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Linear correlation between Cobb angles measured on supine MRI and standing radiographs has been identified. However, the effects of different curve severity on the correlation have not been studied in depth. METHODS: Girls with AIS with standing radiographs and supine MRI were reviewed. From standing radiographs, all structural and nonstructural Cobb angles were measured. For those with simultaneous lateral radiographs, thoracic kyphosis (TK) and lumbar lordosis (LL) angles were measured. On supine MRI, the coronal Cobb angles, TK and LL were measured accordingly. The coronal Cobb angles were divided into 3 groups based on values measured on standing radiographs: mild group for Cobb angles less than 20°, moderate group for 20° to 40°, and severe group for more than 40°. Correlation was analyzed using scatter plot. RESULTS: Eighty patients with AIS with 122 coronal curves were reviewed. On standing radiographs, the coronal Cobb angles were 14.7°± 3.2°, 28.2°± 5.1°, and 54.9°± 11.3° for mild, moderate, and severe groups. On supine MRI, the Cobb angles averaged 10.1°± 5.6°, 20.0°± 6.3°, and 49.4 ± 12.3° for each group, respectively. TK were 16.3 ± 9.1° and 11.8 ± 6.1° for radiographs and MRI (P < 0.001), whereas the LL averaged 45.5 ± 12.2° and 39.5 ± 10.5° for radiographs and MRI (P < 0.001). Cobb angles measured on standing radiographs and supine MRI were linearly correlated with the adjusted R being 0.0627, 0.2118, and 0.7999 for the mild, moderate, and severe groups. CONCLUSION: Cobb angles measured on supine MRI were linearly correlated with Cobb angles measured on standing radiographs and the correlation was more reliable in those with Cobb angles more than 40°. Therefore, the supine MRI could serve as a reliable alternative to standing radiographs in the assessment of Cobb angles more than 40° in AIS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To study how the supine magnetic resonance image (MRI) correlates with standing radiographs of different curve severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Linear correlation between Cobb angles measured on supine MRI and standing radiographs has been identified. However, the effects of different curve severity on the correlation have not been studied in depth. METHODS:Girls with AIS with standing radiographs and supine MRI were reviewed. From standing radiographs, all structural and nonstructural Cobb angles were measured. For those with simultaneous lateral radiographs, thoracic kyphosis (TK) and lumbar lordosis (LL) angles were measured. On supine MRI, the coronal Cobb angles, TK and LL were measured accordingly. The coronal Cobb angles were divided into 3 groups based on values measured on standing radiographs: mild group for Cobb angles less than 20°, moderate group for 20° to 40°, and severe group for more than 40°. Correlation was analyzed using scatter plot. RESULTS: Eighty patients with AIS with 122 coronal curves were reviewed. On standing radiographs, the coronal Cobb angles were 14.7°± 3.2°, 28.2°± 5.1°, and 54.9°± 11.3° for mild, moderate, and severe groups. On supine MRI, the Cobb angles averaged 10.1°± 5.6°, 20.0°± 6.3°, and 49.4 ± 12.3° for each group, respectively. TK were 16.3 ± 9.1° and 11.8 ± 6.1° for radiographs and MRI (P < 0.001), whereas the LL averaged 45.5 ± 12.2° and 39.5 ± 10.5° for radiographs and MRI (P < 0.001). Cobb angles measured on standing radiographs and supine MRI were linearly correlated with the adjusted R being 0.0627, 0.2118, and 0.7999 for the mild, moderate, and severe groups. CONCLUSION: Cobb angles measured on supine MRI were linearly correlated with Cobb angles measured on standing radiographs and the correlation was more reliable in those with Cobb angles more than 40°. Therefore, the supine MRI could serve as a reliable alternative to standing radiographs in the assessment of Cobb angles more than 40° in AIS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Authors: Rob C Brink; Dino Colo; Tom P C Schlösser; Koen L Vincken; Marijn van Stralen; Steve C N Hui; Lin Shi; Winnie C W Chu; Jack C Y Cheng; René M Castelein Journal: Scoliosis Spinal Disord Date: 2017-02-22
Authors: Mayke J van Dort; Johanna Hm Driessen; Elisabeth Apm Romme; Piet Geusens; Paul C Willems; Frank Wjm Smeenk; Emiel Fm Wouters; Joop Pw van den Bergh Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 6.741