Lei Zhu1, Sarah McDavid1, Kevin P M Currie2. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America; Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Abstract
CaV2.2 (N-type) voltage-gated calcium channels (Ca2+ channels) play key roles in neurons and neuroendocrine cells including the control of cellular excitability, neurotransmitter / hormone secretion, and gene expression. Calcium entry is precisely controlled by channel gating properties including multiple forms of inactivation. "Fast" voltage-dependent inactivation is relatively well-characterized and occurs over the tens-to- hundreds of milliseconds timeframe. Superimposed on this is the molecularly distinct, but poorly understood process of "slow" voltage-dependent inactivation, which develops / recovers over seconds-to-minutes. Protein kinases can modulate "slow" inactivation of sodium channels, but little is known about if/how second messengers control "slow" inactivation of Ca2+ channels. We investigated this using recombinant CaV2.2 channels expressed in HEK293 cells and native CaV2 channels endogenously expressed in adrenal chromaffin cells. The PKC activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) dramatically prolonged recovery from "slow" inactivation, but an inactive control (4α-PMA) had no effect. This effect of PMA was prevented by calphostin C, which targets the C1-domain on PKC, but only partially reduced by inhibitors that target the catalytic domain of PKC. The subtype of the channel β-subunit altered the kinetics of inactivation but not the magnitude of slowing produced by PMA. Intracellular GDP-β-S reduced the effect of PMA suggesting a role for G proteins in modulating "slow" inactivation. We postulate that the kinetics of recovery from "slow" inactivation could provide a molecular memory of recent cellular activity and help control CaV2 channel availability, electrical excitability, and neurotransmission in the seconds-to-minutes timeframe.
CaV2.2 (n class="Chemical">N-type) voltage-gated calcium channels (Ca2+ channels) play key roles in neurons and neuroendocrine cells including the control of cellular excitability, neurotransmitter / hormone secretion, and gene expression. Calcium entry is precisely controlled by channel gating properties including multiple forms of inactivation. "Fast" voltage-dependent inactivation is relatively well-characterized and occurs over the tens-to- hundreds of milliseconds timeframe. Superimposed on this is the molecularly distinct, but poorly understood process of "slow" voltage-dependent inactivation, which develops / recovers over seconds-to-minutes. Protein kinases can modulate "slow" inactivation of sodium channels, but little is known about if/how second messengers control "slow" inactivation of Ca2+ channels. We investigated this using recombinant CaV2.2 channels expressed in HEK293 cells and native CaV2 channels endogenously expressed in adrenal chromaffin cells. The PKC activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) dramatically prolonged recovery from "slow" inactivation, but an inactive control (4α-PMA) had no effect. This effect of PMA was prevented by calphostin C, which targets the C1-domain on PKC, but only partially reduced by inhibitors that target the catalytic domain of PKC. The subtype of the channel β-subunit altered the kinetics of inactivation but not the magnitude of slowing produced by PMA. Intracellular GDP-β-S reduced the effect of PMA suggesting a role for G proteins in modulating "slow" inactivation. We postulate that the kinetics of recovery from "slow" inactivation could provide a molecular memory of recent cellular activity and help control CaV2 channel availability, electrical excitability, and neurotransmission in the seconds-to-minutes timeframe.
Authors: A Perez-Burgos; T Perez-Rosello; H Salgado; E Flores-Barrera; G A Prieto; A Figueroa; E Galarraga; J Bargas Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: María A Gandini; Daniel R Henríquez; Lizbeth Grimaldo; Alejandro Sandoval; Christophe Altier; Gerald W Zamponi; Ricardo Felix; Christian González-Billault Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: Eun Young Kim; Christine H Rumpf; Yuichiro Fujiwara; Elizabeth S Cooley; Filip Van Petegem; Daniel L Minor Journal: Structure Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Hermann Cuntz; Peter Jedlicka; Marcel Beining; Lucas Alberto Mongiat; Stephan Wolfgang Schwarzacher Journal: Elife Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Ravi Chopra; Aaron H Wasserman; Stefan M Pulst; Chris I De Zeeuw; Vikram G Shakkottai Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2018-04-15 Impact factor: 6.150