Literature DB >> 26222482

Psychosocial Factors Associated With Withdrawal From the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening After 1 Episode of Repeat Screening.

Valerie Jenkins1, Lesley Fallowfield, Carolyn Langridge, Jessica Barrett, Andy Ryan, Ian Jacobs, Justine Kilkerr, Usha Menon, Vernon Farewell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) aims to establish the efficacy of 2 different ovarian cancer screening schedules. The psychosocial substudy examines the psychological factors associated with the screening program.
METHODS: Women aged 50 to 75 years from 16 UK gynecologic centers randomized to annual multimodal screening or ultrasound screening (US) groups were followed up for 7 years. Psychosocial data from women who withdrew from the study after a repeat screen were examined.
RESULTS: Sixteen percent (3499/21,733) of women requiring a repeat screening test in addition to annual screen withdrew from the study: 12.9% (1560/12,073) from the multimodal group and 20.1% (1939/9660) from the US group. An estimated relative risk of withdrawal is 1.46 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.56; P ≤ 0.001) for the US arm. High anxiety trait and increased psychological morbidity significantly influenced withdrawal, even when age, screening center, and group were taken into account (P < 0.001). The risk of withdrawal decreased significantly the longer a woman stayed in UKCTOCS, irrespective of the number of screens and intensity in the preceding year.
CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal rate was greater in women undergoing US screening and in those who had repeats earlier in UKCTOCS. Having a high predisposition to anxiety, high current state anxiety, and above threshold general psychological morbidity all increased the withdrawal rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26222482      PMCID: PMC4582418          DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  12 in total

1.  Re-attendance at biennial screening mammography following a repeated false positive recall.

Authors:  Elisabeth G Klompenhouwer; Lucien E M Duijm; Adri C Voogd; Gerard J den Heeten; Luc J Strobbe; Marieke W Louwman; Jan Willem Coebergh; Dick Venderink; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Adverse psychological outcomes in colorectal cancer screening: does health anxiety play a role?

Authors:  A Miles; J Wardle
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2005-10-21

3.  Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.

Authors:  J Brett; J Austoker
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2001-12

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Rachel Hallett; Andy Ryan; Matthew Burnell; Aarti Sharma; Sara Lewis; Susan Davies; Susan Philpott; Alberto Lopes; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad W Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar N Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Alistair McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Naveena Singh; Anne Dawnay; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Cognitive and behavioral responses to illness information: the role of health anxiety.

Authors:  H D Hadjistavropoulos; K D Craig; T Hadjistavropoulos
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1998-02

6.  The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Steinar Thoresen; Steinar Tretli
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Acceptance of transvaginal sonography by postmenopausal women participating in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  A Gentry-Maharaj; A Sharma; M Burnell; A Ryan; N N Amso; M W Seif; G Turner; C Brunell; G Fletcher; R Rangar; L Fallowfield; S Campbell; I Jacobs; U Menon
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Awareness of ovarian cancer risk factors, beliefs and attitudes towards screening: baseline survey of 21,715 women participating in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  L Fallowfield; A Fleissig; J Barrett; U Menon; I Jacobs; J Kilkerr; V Farewell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Psychological morbidity associated with ovarian cancer screening: results from more than 23,000 women in the randomised trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  J Barrett; V Jenkins; V Farewell; U Menon; I Jacobs; J Kilkerr; A Ryan; C Langridge; L Fallowfield
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Recruitment to multicentre trials--lessons from UKCTOCS: descriptive study.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Aarti Sharma; Matthew Burnell; Rachel Hallett; Sara Lewis; Alberto Lopez; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Ali McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Steve Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-11-13
View more
  5 in total

1.  Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Amanda T Wiggins; Edward J Pavlik; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-10-25

2.  Affective, cognitive and behavioral outcomes associated with a false positive ovarian cancer screening test result.

Authors:  Amanda T Wiggins; Edward J Pavlik; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-04-21

3.  The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT.

Authors:  Lesley Fallowfield; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Usha Menon; Carolyn Langridge; Shirley May; Ian Jacobs; Valerie Jenkins
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Sexual functioning in 4,418 postmenopausal women participating in UKCTOCS: a qualitative free-text analysis.

Authors:  Helena Harder; Rachel M L Starkings; Lesley J Fallowfield; Usha Menon; Ian J Jacobs; Valerie A Jenkins
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Anxiety, locus of control and sociodemographic factors associated with adherence to an annual clinical skin monitoring: a cross-sectional survey among 1000 high-risk French patients involved in a pilot-targeted screening programme for melanoma.

Authors:  Cédric Rat; Sandrine Hild; Aurelie Gaultier; Amir Khammari; Angelique Bonnaud-Antignac; Gaelle Quereux; Brigitte Dreno; Jean Michel Nguyen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.