| Literature DB >> 26222158 |
Mohd Rizal Abu Bakar1, Azidah Abdul Kadir2, Siti Zubaidah Abdul Wahab2, Ahmad Helmy Abdul Karim2, Nik Hazlina Nik Hussain2, Norhayati Mohd Noor2, Julia Omar2, Saringat Bin Bai Bae3, Wan Haslindawani Wan Mahmood2, Asrenee Abdul Razak2, Rohaizan Yunus4.
Abstract
AIM: To compare the mean of anteroposterior (AP) measurements of the uterus in longitudinal and oblique transverse planes, and the pulsatility index (PI) and resistive index (RI) of the uterine artery and superficial skin wound artery between patients taking Channa striatus and placebo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26222158 PMCID: PMC4519193 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flowchart of the study.
Baseline characteristics of the subjects.
| Demographic characteristics |
| Placebo (N = 30) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean(SD) | N (%) | Mean(SD) | N (%) | ||
| Age | 30.58(4.45) | 28.10(5.56) | 0.144 | ||
| Parity | 2.52(1.72) | 2. 20(1.69) | 0.480 | ||
| Types of LSCS | |||||
| Elective | 2(6.06) | 2(6.67) | 0.582 | ||
| Emergency | 31(93.94) | 28(93.33) | |||
| Uterine AP measurement | |||||
| Longitudinal plane | 73.73(6.30) | 77.18(0.12) | 0.316 | ||
| Oblique transverse plane | 77.18(6.77) | 68.92(21.56) | 0.507 | ||
| Uterine artery RI | 0.45(0.25) | 0.42(0.16) | 0.357 | ||
| Uterine artery PI | 0.91(0.12) | 0.73(0.24) | 0.143 | ||
| Superficial skin artery RI | 0.43(0.10) | 0.42(0.15) | 0.778 | ||
| Superficial skin artery PI | 0.91(0.15) | 0.76(0.25) | 0.141 | ||
*Determined by Independent-t test
**Determined by Simple logistic regression
LSCS, Lower Segment Caesarean Section; AP, anterior posterior; RI, resistive index; PI, pulsatility index.
Between group differences based on time for longitudinal, oblique transverse planes of uterine AP measurements or RI and PI measurements of the uterine and superficial arteries (ITT analysis, N = 63).
| Outcomes | Group | Day 3 | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | F-statistic | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Longitudinal |
| 73.73 | 43.8 | 40.84 | 27.66 | 3.93(3) | 0.013 |
| (N = 33) | (68.32,79.13) | (36.58,51.06) | (36.80,44.89) | (23.76,31.55) | |||
| Placebo | 69.77 | 56.05 | 46.57 | 38.02 | |||
| (N = 30) | (64.10,75.43) | (48.45,50.81) | (42.32,50.81) | (33.93,42.10) | |||
| Oblique Transverse plane |
| 77.18 | 46.37 | 44.23 | 28.62 | 5.76(3) | 0.002 |
| (N = 33) | (71.73,82.63) | (38.84,53.89) | (39.79,48.66) | (24.73,32.51) | |||
| Placebo | 68.92 | 53.13 | 48.46 | 38.51 | |||
| (N = 30) | (63.20,74.63) | (49.24,65.02) | (43.81,53.11) | (34.43,42.59) | |||
| Uterine artery RI |
| 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.94(3) | 0.423 |
| (N = 33) | (0.40.0.49) | (0.38,0.53) | (0.61,0.72) | (0.65,0.81) | |||
| Placebo | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 0.74 | |||
| (N = 30) | (0.37,0.46) | (0.43,0.59) | (0.56,0.67) | (0.65,0.82) | |||
| Uterine artery PI |
| 0.91 | 0.92 | 1.29 | 1.60 | 2.50(3) | 0.068 |
| (N = 33) | (0.84,0.97) | (0.77,1.07) | (1.81,1.41) | (1.43,1.77) | |||
| Placebo | 0.73 | 1.03 | 1.31 | 1.62 | |||
| (N = 30) | (0.67,0.80) | (0.87,1.19) | (1.19,1.42) | (1.43,1.80) | |||
| Superficial skin artery RI |
| 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 1.46(3) | 0.232 |
| (N = 33) | (0.38,0.47) | (0.37,0.52) | (0.60,0.71) | (0.64,0.80) | |||
| Placebo | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.71 | |||
| (N = 30) | (0.37,0.47) | (0.42,0.58) | (0.52,0.64) | (0.63,0.79) | |||
| Superficial skin artery PI |
| 0.91 | 0.90 | 1.28 | 1.59 | 2.07(3) | 0.113 |
| (N = 33) | (0.84,0.98) | (0.75,1.04) | (1.16,1.39) | (1.41,1.77) | |||
| Placebo | 0.76 | 1.04 | 1.46 | 1.52 | |||
| (N = 30) | (0.69,0.84) | (0.89,1.19) | (1.06,1.85) | (1.34,1.17) |
AP, anterior posterior; RI, resistive index; PI, pulsatility index.
*Repeated measure ANOVA was applied followed by pairwise comparison with Bonferroni confidence interval adjustment. Assumption of normality, homogeneity of variances and compound symmetry were checked and fulfilled.
Between group differences based on time for longitudinal, oblique transverse planes of uterine AP measurements or RI and PI measurements of the uterine and superficial arteries (per protocol analysis, N = 49).
| Outcomes | Group | Day 3 | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | F-statistic | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Longitudinal |
| 73.25 | 55.48 | 41.28 | 29.26 | 23.6(1) | <0.001 |
| (N = 25) | (69.60, 76.90) | (52.58, 58.39) | (39.28, 43.28) | (26.84, 31.69) | |||
| Placebo | 74.92 | 60.61 | 50.69 | 40.55 | |||
| (N = 24) | (71.19, 78.65) | (57.65, 63.58) | (48.65, 52.74) | (38.08, 43.03) | |||
| Oblique Transverse plane |
| 76.99 | 58.94 | 44.32 | 30.74 | 10.9(1) | 0.002 |
| (N = 25) | (73.18, 80.80) | (56.17, 61.71) | (41.82, 46.81) | (28.43, 33.05) | |||
| Placebo | 74.21 | 61.34 | 52.60 | 41.25 | |||
| (N = 24) | (70.32, 78.10) | (58.51, 64.17) | (50.05, 55.14) | (38.89, 43.61) | |||
| Uterine artery RI |
| 0.44 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 1.4(1) | 0.248 |
| (N = 25) | (0.40, 0.48) | (0.55, 0.61) | (0.66, 0.71) | (0.78, 0.84) | |||
| Placebo | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.80 | |||
| (N = 24) | (0.39, 0.47) | (0.51, 0.58) | (0.64, 0.70) | (0.77, 0.83) | |||
| Uterine artery PI |
| 0.91 | 1.18 | 1.35 | 1.78 | 5.2(1) | 0.027 |
| (N = 25) | (0.85, 0.96) | (1.11, 1.24) | (1.29, 1.41) | (1.72, 1.83) | |||
| Placebo | 0.80 | 1.39 | 1.40 | 1.73 | |||
| (N = 24) | (0.74, 0.85) | (1.03, 1.16) | (1.34, 1.45) | (1.68, 1.78) | |||
| Superficial skin artery RI |
| 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 1.6(1) | 0.213 |
| (n = 25) | (0.38, 0.46) | (0.54, 0.60) | (0.65, 0.71) | (0.77, 0.83) | |||
| Placebo | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.76 | |||
| (N = 24) | (0.41, 0.50) | (0.51, 0.57) | (0.59, 0.66) | (0.73, 0.79) | |||
| Superficial skin artery PI |
| 0.90 | 1.14 | 1.33 | 1.76 | 3.0(1) | 0.089 |
| (N = 25) | (0.83, 0.96) | (1.09, 1.20) | (1.26, 1.40) | (1.67, 1.85) | |||
| Placebo | 0.84 | 1.10 | 1.34 | 1.62 | |||
| (N = 24) | (0.77, 0.90) | (1.04, 1.16) | (1.27, 1.41) | (1.53, 1.71) |
AP, anterior posterior; RI, resistive index; PI, pulsatility index.
*Repeated measure ANOVA was applied followed by pairwise comparison with Bonferroni confidence interval adjustment. Assumption of normality, homogeneity of variances and compound symmetry were checked and fulfilled.