| Literature DB >> 26221113 |
Karina Maria Olbrich Dos Santos1, Antônio Diogo Silva Vieira2, Hévila Oliveira Salles3, Jacqueline da Silva Oliveira3, Cíntia Renata Costa Rocha4, Maria de Fátima Borges5, Laura Maria Bruno5, Bernadette Dora Gombossy de Melo Franco6, Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov6.
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize the safety and technological properties of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from Brazilian Coalho cheeses. High levels of co-aggregation were observed between Enterococcus faecium strains EM485 and EM925 and both Escherichia coli and Clostridium perfringens . Both strains presented low levels of hydrophobicity. E. faecium EM485 and EM925 were both able to grow in the presence of 0.5% of the sodium salts of taurocholic acid (TC), taurodeoxycholic acid (TDC), glycocholic acid (GC), and glycodeoxycholic acid (GDC), although they showed the ability to deconjugate only GDC and TDC. Both strains showed good survival when exposed to conditions simulating the gastro intestinal tract (GIT). When tested for the presence of virulence genes, only tyrosine decarboxylase and vancomycin B generated positive PCR results.Entities:
Keywords: Enterococcus faecium; antibiotic resistance; probiotic properties; technological properties; virulence factors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26221113 PMCID: PMC4512068 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246120131245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Primers sequences utilized in the investigation of presence/absence for virulence factors, vancomycin resistance and biogenic amine production.
|
|
| Primers (5′ - 3′) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Virulence genes
| ||||
|
| − | − |
TATGACAATGCTTTTTGGGAT
|
|
|
| − | − |
ACAGAAGAGCTGCAGGAAATG
|
|
|
| − | − |
GCACGCTATTACGAACTATGA
|
|
|
| − | − |
AGATTTCATCTTTGATTCTTG
|
|
|
| − | − |
ACTCGGGGATTGATAGGC
|
|
|
| − | − |
GCCAATTGGGACAGACCCTC
|
|
|
| − | − |
GAATTGAGCAAAAGTTCAATCG
|
|
| Antibiotic resistance | ||||
|
| − | − |
TCTGCAATAGAGATAGCCGC
|
|
|
| + | + |
GCTCCGCAGCCTGCATGGACA
|
|
| Biogenic amine | ||||
|
| − | − |
AGATGGTATTGTTTCTTATG
|
|
|
| − | − |
AAYTCNTTYGAYTTYGARAARGARG
|
|
|
| + | + |
GAYATNATNGGNATNGGNYTNGAYCARG
|
|
|
| − | − |
GTNTTYAAYGCNGAYAARCANTAYTTYGT
|
|
Positive results (+) for genes for virulence and biogenic amines in E. faecium EM485 and EM925.
gel E (gelatinase), hyl (hyaluronidase), asa 1 (aggregation substance), esp (enterococcal surface protein), cyl A (cytolysin), efa A (endocarditis antigen), ace (adhesion of collagen), van A and van B (vancomycin resistance), hdc 1 and hdc 2 (histidine decarboxylase), tdc (tyrosine decarboxylase), and odc (ornithine decarboxylase).
Antimicrobial susceptibility.
| Antibiotic |
MIC breakpoint recommendation of EUCAST (2011) and |
|
| Sensitivity or resistance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| EUCAST | EFSA | ||||
| Amoxicillin | S ≤ 4 μg/mL, R ≥ 8 μg/mL | NS | 0.12 μg/mL | 0.06 μg/mL | S |
| Amoxicillin/clavulonic acid | S ≤ 4 μg/mL, R ≥ 8 μg/mL | NS | 0.12 μg/mL | 0.25 μg/mL | S |
| Ampicillin | S ≤ 4 μg/mL, R ≥ 8 μg/mL | 4 | 0.5 μg/mL | 0.12 μg/mL | S |
| Cefotaxime | NS | NS | 0.25 μg/mL | 0.25 μg/mL | S |
| Ceftriaxone | NS | NS | 0.12 μg/mL | 0.06 μg/mL | S |
| Ciprofloxacin | NS | NS | - | - | R |
| Erythromycin | 4 | 0.25 μg/mL | 0.5 μg/mL | S | |
| Gentamicin | > 128 μg/mL |
R > 32 μg/mL
| 16.0 μg/mL | 32.0 μg/mL | S |
| Imipenem | S ≤ 4 μg/mL, R ≥ 8 μg/mL | NS | 0.015 μg/mL | 0.015 μg/mL | S |
| Levofloxacin | NS | NS | 8.0 μg/mL | 8.0 μg/mL | S |
| Linezolid | NS | NS | 1.0 μg/mL | 1.0 μg/mL | S |
| Meropenem | NS | NS | 0.015 μg/mL | 0.015 μg/mL | S |
| Metronidazole | NS | NS | - | - | R |
| Oxacillin | NS | NS | 4.0 μg/mL | 4.0 μg/mL | S |
| Penicillin | NS | NS | 1.0 μg/mL | 1.0 μg/mL | S |
| Tetracycline | NS | R > 2 μg/mL | 4.0 μg/mL | 4.0 μg/mL | R |
| Vancomycin | S ≤ 4 μg/mL, R > 4 μg/mL | R > 4 μg/mL | - | - | R |
− = growth of tested Enterococcus faecium strain was not effected by antibiotic;
with potential interference form the medium; NS = not specified by cited documents; R = resistant; S = sensitive.
Growth in milk and viability in milk acidified with lactic acid.
| Microorganism | Milk’s pH after |
Viability
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| 6 h | 24 h | 48 h | pH 4.0 | pH 5.0 | |
|
| 5.8 | 5.2 | 4.8 |
0.6
|
0.95
|
|
| 5.3 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 0 |
0.47
|
Difference between counts at time 0 and after 30 days of cold storage (5 °C) in milk acidified at different pH values.
Increase of viable cell counts.
Figure 1Effect of simulated gastric and intestinal conditions on the viability of selected strains. T0 = After 72 h in MRS broth; T1 = After 1 h in gastric model conditions; T3 = after 3 h in small intestine model conditions.
Figure 2Proteolytic activity (A) Extracellular proteolytic activity measured from two Enterococcus faecium strains compared with that of unfermented milk (milk blank). The strains were grown in milk for 24 h at 37 °C and the samples were assayed using the o -phthaldialdehyde method in a spectrophotometer at 340 nm. The data are reported as the mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). Different letters show significant difference (p < 0.05, t -test). (B) Protein concentration in extracellular enzymatic extract of two Enterococcus faecium strains compared with that of unfermented milk (milk blank). The strains were grown in milk for 24 h at 37 °C. The data are reported as the mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). Different letters show significant difference (p < 0.05, t -test).
Figure 3Aggregation properties (auto-aggregation and co-aggregation) for E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 with Escherichia coli INCQS 00033 and C . perfringens INCQS 00130.