Literature DB >> 26221113

Safety, beneficial and technological properties of Enterococcus faecium isolated from Brazilian cheeses.

Karina Maria Olbrich Dos Santos1, Antônio Diogo Silva Vieira2, Hévila Oliveira Salles3, Jacqueline da Silva Oliveira3, Cíntia Renata Costa Rocha4, Maria de Fátima Borges5, Laura Maria Bruno5, Bernadette Dora Gombossy de Melo Franco6, Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov6.   

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the safety and technological properties of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from Brazilian Coalho cheeses. High levels of co-aggregation were observed between Enterococcus faecium strains EM485 and EM925 and both Escherichia coli and Clostridium perfringens . Both strains presented low levels of hydrophobicity. E. faecium EM485 and EM925 were both able to grow in the presence of 0.5% of the sodium salts of taurocholic acid (TC), taurodeoxycholic acid (TDC), glycocholic acid (GC), and glycodeoxycholic acid (GDC), although they showed the ability to deconjugate only GDC and TDC. Both strains showed good survival when exposed to conditions simulating the gastro intestinal tract (GIT). When tested for the presence of virulence genes, only tyrosine decarboxylase and vancomycin B generated positive PCR results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterococcus faecium; antibiotic resistance; probiotic properties; technological properties; virulence factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26221113      PMCID: PMC4512068          DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246120131245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.476


Introduction

Enterococcus spp. presents very high survival in the presence of salts and variable pH and is adapted to several food systems. In the Mediterranean region, Enterococcus spp. have played important roles in the preparation of various fermented milk and meat products for centuries, and they are essential for the ripening of cheese products and to the development of their aroma ( Giraffa, 2002 ; Foulequié-Moreno ; Franz ) due to proteolysis, lipolysis, and the production of diacetyl ( Giraffa, 2003 ). In addition, various studies have shown that bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria (LAB), including Enterococcus spp., are commonly isolated from Brazilian dairy products ( Gomes ; Frazzon ; Moraes ; Ortolani ). Numerous studies in the last decade have demonstrated the safe application of enterococci in foods ( Franz ; Ogier and Serror, 2008 ; Martin-Platero ), and certain enterococci have been investigated with regard to their potential as probiotics ( Franz ; Foulquié-Moreno ; Botes ; Todorov and Dicks, 2008 ). The application of Enterococci as a starter culture or a probiotic has been increasingly investigated, and Enterococcus faecium SF68 ® (NCIMB 10415, Cerbios-Pharma SA, Barbengo, Switzerland) and E. faecalis Symbioflor 1 (SymbioPharm, Herborn, Germany) have been successfully applied for the treatment of diarrhea in dogs and cats ( Bybee ). In addition, E. durans M4–5 was found to produce butyrate, which induces significant anti-inflammatory effects and helps preserve the epithelial integrity of the intestine ( Raz ; Avram-Hananel ). Enterococci probiotics are also used to prevent or treat diarrhea in pigs, poultry, cattle, and pets ( Franz ). However, their role as probiotics is still controversial because of their increased association with nosocomial infections and because they harbor multiple antibiotic-resistant genes, which are transmissible by conjugation to pathogenic microorganisms ( Dicks ; Franz ; Montalban-Lopez ). Several putative virulence factors have been described in enterococci, such as aggregation substance protein, gelatinase, cytolysin, enterococcal surface proteins, hyaluronidase, accessory colonization factors and endocarditis antigens ( Vankerckhoven ; Martin-Platero ). In this study, bacteriocin-producing strains isolated from artisanal Coalho cheese produced in Ceará state, Brazil ( dos Santos ) were evaluated regarding their beneficial and technological potential. The strains have been identified to be E. faecium ( dos Santos ). Moreover, their safety and technological properties were determined. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the characterization of beneficial E. faecium strains isolated from Coalho cheese with potential technological applications.

Materials and Methods

Strains

E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 have been previously isolated from Coalho cheese and identified based on biochemical, physiological and genetic properties ( dos Santos ). Bacterial cultures were maintained in the presence of 20% glycerol at −80 °C.

Safety evaluation

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Discs (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) were employed to assess the susceptibility of selected enterococcus strains to antimicrobials classified as inhibitors of cell envelope synthesis (penicillin G, ampicillin and vancomycin), protein synthesis inhibitors (gentamicin, streptomycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and eritromycin), and inhibitors of nucleic acid synthesis (co-trimoxazole, rifampicin and metronidazole). MRS agar (Difco) plates containing 10 6 –10 7 cfu/mL of E. faecium EM485 or E. faecium EM925, respectively, were prepared after strain cultivation in MRS broth at 37 °C for 48 h. Discs impregnated with the antimicrobials were applied to the plates, which were subsequently incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Inhibition zones around the discs were measured, and the strain was considered resistant to the antimicrobial agent according to the size of the inhibition zone ( Charteris ). The test was performed in triplicate. In addition, the MIC (minimum inhibition concentration) was determined by using MICE Test strips (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). MRS agar plates containing 10 6 –10 7 cfu/mL were prepared after strain cultivation in MRS broth at 37 °C for 48 h. Antibiotic strips impregnated with a gradient of antimicrobials were applied to the plates, which were subsequently incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Inhibition zones around the strips were recorded. The test was performed in triplicate.

Characterization of virulence potential

E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 were tested for the following virulence genes: gel E (gelatinase), hyl (hyaluronidase), asa 1 (aggregation substance), esp (enterococcal surface protein), cyl A (cytolysin), efa A (endocarditis antigen), ace (adhesion of collagen), van A and van B (both related to vancomycin resistance), and for genes for amino acid decarboxylases: hdc 1 and hdc 2 (both related to histidine decarboxylase), tdc (tyrosine decarboxylase), and odc (ornithine decarboxylase) using PCR protocols from Martin-Platero , Rivas and Vankerckhoven . The amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on 0.8 to 2.0% (w/v) agarose gels in 0.5x TAE buffer. The gels were stained in TAE buffer containing 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich Co.). The primers are detailed in Table 1 .
Table 1

Primers sequences utilized in the investigation of presence/absence for virulence factors, vancomycin resistance and biogenic amine production.

Enterococcus faecium EM485 Enterococcus faecium EM925 Primers (5′ - 3′)Reference
Virulence genes *
gelE TATGACAATGCTTTTTGGGAT AGATGCACCCGAAATAATATA Vankerckhoven et al. , 2004
Hyl ACAGAAGAGCTGCAGGAAATG GACTGACGTCCAAGTTTCCAA Vankerckhoven et al. , 2004
asa1 GCACGCTATTACGAACTATGA TAAGAAAGAACATCACCACGA Vankerckhoven et al. , 2004
Esp AGATTTCATCTTTGATTCTTG AATTGATTCTTTAGCATCTGG Vankerckhoven et al. , 2004
cylA ACTCGGGGATTGATAGGC GCTGCTAAAGCTGCGCTT Vankerckhoven et al. , 2004
efaA GCCAATTGGGACAGACCCTC CGCCTTCTGTTCCTTCTTTGGC Martin-Platero et al. , 2009
Ace GAATTGAGCAAAAGTTCAATCG GTCTGTCTTTTCACTTGTTTC Martin-Platero et al. , 2009
Antibiotic resistance
Van A TCTGCAATAGAGATAGCCGC GGAGTAGCTATCCCAGCATT Martin-Platero et al. , 2009
Van B ++ GCTCCGCAGCCTGCATGGACA ACGATGCCGCCATCCTCCTGC Martin-Platero et al. , 2009
Biogenic amine
hdc 1 AGATGGTATTGTTTCTTATG AGACCATACACCATAACCTT Rivas et al. , 2005
hdc 2 AAYTCNTTYGAYTTYGARAARGARG ATNGGNGANCCDATCATYTTRTGNCC Rivas et al. , 2005
Tdc ++ GAYATNATNGGNATNGGNYTNGAYCARG CCRTARTCNGGNATAGCRAARTCNGTRTG Rivas et al. , 2005
odc GTNTTYAAYGCNGAYAARCANTAYTTYGT ATNGARTTNAGTTCRCAYTTYTCNGG Rivas et al. , 2005

Positive results (+) for genes for virulence and biogenic amines in E. faecium EM485 and EM925.

gel E (gelatinase), hyl (hyaluronidase), asa 1 (aggregation substance), esp (enterococcal surface protein), cyl A (cytolysin), efa A (endocarditis antigen), ace (adhesion of collagen), van A and van B (vancomycin resistance), hdc 1 and hdc 2 (histidine decarboxylase), tdc (tyrosine decarboxylase), and odc (ornithine decarboxylase).

Primers sequences utilized in the investigation of presence/absence for virulence factors, vancomycin resistance and biogenic amine production. Positive results (+) for genes for virulence and biogenic amines in E. faecium EM485 and EM925. gel E (gelatinase), hyl (hyaluronidase), asa 1 (aggregation substance), esp (enterococcal surface protein), cyl A (cytolysin), efa A (endocarditis antigen), ace (adhesion of collagen), van A and van B (vancomycin resistance), hdc 1 and hdc 2 (histidine decarboxylase), tdc (tyrosine decarboxylase), and odc (ornithine decarboxylase).

Hydrophobicity

To evaluate cell surface hydrophobicity, overnight stationary-phase cultures of E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 were centrifuged at 7000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C (Centrifuge 5810R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), washed twice with phosphate buffer (50 mM K 2 HPO 4 /KH 2 PO 4 , pH 6.5), and re-suspended in the same buffer until A 560 values (A 0 ) near 1.0 were obtained. N- hexadecane was then added to the cell suspension (1:5) and the mixture was vortexed for 120 s. After a period of 1 h at 37 °C, the A 560 value (A) of the aqueous layer was measured. Cell surface hydrophobicity was calculated according to the equation: %H = [(Ao − A)/Ao] × 100, where Ao and A are the absorbance values before and after extraction with the organic solvent, respectively. The assay was performed in sextuplicate.

Beneficial and technological properties

Viability in milk acidified with lactic acid

The growth in milk was evaluated as described by Vinderola with some modifications. E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 were activated in MRS broth for 16 h at 35 °C. The cultures (1 mL) were centrifuged (6000 × g , 15 min, 4 °C) and washed twice with buffered phosphate saline (PBS) solution, pH 7.4. The cells were re-suspended to 10 mL with reconstituted skim milk (10%, w/v) and incubated at 35 °C. Changes in milk pH were recorded after 6, 24 and 48 h of incubation. Each cell suspension (1.5%, v/v) was transferred to skim milk (10%, w/v) previously acidified with lactic acid to pH 4.0 or 5.0. The control was skim milk without added lactic acid. Cultures were incubated up to 30 days at 5 °C. Strains viability was tested by plating on MRS agar and counting colonies on days 0 and 30 as described by Vinderola .

Effect of simulated gastric and intestinal conditions on the viability of selected strains

To compare the survival of E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 throughout a simulated gastric and intestinal passage, an in vitro model was employed, adapted from Pinto . MRS broth was inoculated with approximately 2 × 10 8 cfu/mL of an overnight culture, and an aliquot of 1 mL was serially diluted in peptone water, pour-plated onto acidified MRS agar (pH 5.4), and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 72 h to determine the cfu/mL at time 0. To simulate gastric conditions, 6 mL of the cell suspension was diluted in 10 mL of an artificial gastric fluid consisting of a sterile electrolyte solution (6.2 g/L NaCl, 2.2 g/L KCl, 0.22 g/L CaCl 2 and 1.2 g/L NaHCO 3 , pH adjusted to 2.5) with 0.3% pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and incubated 1 h at 37 °C under agitation (150 rpm; Dubnoff Bath, Tecnal, Piracicaba, Brazil). After this period, a 1 mL aliquot was removed, serially diluted in peptone water, pour-plated onto acidified MRS agar, and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C. To simulate passage through the small intestine, 2 mL of the remaining suspension was diluted in 8 mL of artificial duodenal secretion (pH 7.2) consisting of 6.4 g/L NaHCO3, 0.239 g/L KCl, 1.28 g/L NaCl, 0.5% bile salts (Oxgall, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 0.1% pancreatin (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, USA). After 3 h of incubation at 37 °C under agitation (150 rpm), 1 mL aliquots were removed to determine the final cfu/mL. The assay was performed three times for each strain, and the enterococcus enumeration was performed in triplicate.

β-galactosidase activity

The β-galactosidase activity of E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 was assessed employing sterile filter paper disks impregnated with o -nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranose (ONPG Disks, Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer instructions. Overnight cultures of each strain were streaked on MRS agar plates and incubated anaerobically (GasPack System, Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) at 37 °C for 48 h. A colony of each strain was picked up and emulsified in a tube containing an ONPG disk with 0.1 mL of sterile 0.85% (w/v) sodium chloride solution. The tubes were incubated at 35 °C and observed at intervals of one hour for up to 6 h. The release of a yellow chromogenic compound, o -nitrophenol, indicates a positive colony. The test was performed twice for each strain, in duplicate.

Bile salt deconjugation

To evaluate the ability of E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 to perform bile salt deconjugation, overnight cultures of each isolate were streaked onto MRS agar plates containing 0.5% (w/v) of the sodium salt of taurocholic acid (TC), taurodeoxycholic acid (TDC), glycocholic acid (GC), or glycodeoxycholic acid (GDC), all from Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, USA. After anaerobic incubation (GasPack System, Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) at 37 °C for 72 h, the presence of opaque halos around colonies was considered positive for bile salt deconjugation . The test was performed two times for each strain, in duplicate.

Proteolytic activity

E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 were cultivated in 5 mL of MRS broth for 24 h at 37 °C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10 000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The pellets were washed three times with 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution, resuspended in 10 mL of sterile 10% (w/v) skim milk, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. A control group with 10 mL of sterile 10% skim milk, but without inoculum, was incubated under the same conditions. At the end of the incubation the fermented and control groups were centrifuged at 10 000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was designated as the extracellular enzymatic extract. After withdrawal of the extracellular enzymatic extract, the obtained pellets were washed with 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and submitted to a protocol of Tsakalidou to prepare a cell wall extract. In all steps, the protein content of the extracts was estimated using the method of Bradford (1976) . Bovine serum albumin was used as a standard. The protease assay was carried out as described previously by Church using o -phthaldialdehyde (OPA). The proteolytic activity of the stains in fermented milk was expressed as the absorbance of free amino groups measured at 340 nm, and specific activity was calculated by dividing the protease activity values by the protein content results. One unit of protease activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce an increase of 0.001 in the optical density at 340 nm of the fermented milk relative to that of the unfermented milk (milk blank). To investigate the locations of the proteolytic enzymes, 100 μg of protein from either the extracellular enzymatic extract or the cell wall extract was assayed by zymogram. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10.0% polyacrylamide gel) according to Laemmle (1970) with 0.1% gelatin included in the gel was applied. To re-nature the enzymes after SDS-PAGE, the gels were treated twice with Triton-X 100 for 30 min each time, washed with water and incubated with 20 mM CaCl 2 in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 at 37 °C for 72 h. The gels were stained with silver. All the analyses were carried out in triplicate. Multi-comparison of means was assessed by Student t -test at the 0.05 (p < 0.05) level of statistical significance.

Aggregation of E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 with Escherichia coli INCQS 00033 and Clostridium perfringens INCQS 00130

To evaluate auto-aggregation, strains E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 were grown in MRS broth for 24 h at 37 °C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 7000 × g for 10 min at 20 °C, washed, resuspended and diluted in 0.85% sterile saline to OD 660nm = 0.3. One milliliter of the cell suspension was transferred to a 2 mL sterile plastic cuvette and the OD 660nm was recorded over 60 min using a spectrophotometer (Ultraspec 2000, Pharmacia Biotech). Auto-aggregation was determined using the following equation ( Todorov and Dicks, 2008 ): OD 0 refers to the initial OD and OD 60 refers to the OD determined after 60 min. For determination of OD 60 the cultures were centrifuged at 300 × g for 2 min at 20 °C. To evaluate co-aggregation, strains E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 were grown in 10 mL MRS and Escherichia coli INCQS 00033 and Clostridium ( C. ) perfringens INCQS 00130 were grown in BHI or MRS at 37 °C. Cells were harvested after 24 h (7000 × g , 10 min, 20 °C), washed, re-suspended and diluted in 0.85% sterile saline to OD 660nm = 0.3. Then, 500 μL of each suspension was mixed in a 2 mL sterile plastic cuvette and the OD 660nm was recorded over 60 min using a spectrophotometer (Ultraspec 2000, Pharmacia Biotech). The degree of co-aggregation was determined by OD readings of mixed cultures. Co-aggregation was calculated using the following equation ( Todorov and Dicks, 2008 ): OD tot refers to the initial OD, taken immediately after the tested strains were mixed, and OD S refers to the OD of the supernatant after 60 min. The experiments were conducted in triplicate on two separate occasions.

Results and Discussion

Effect of antibiotics on the growth of E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925

According to the results of the disc diffusion method (data not shown), the two studied E. faecium strains, EM485 and EM925, demonstrated susceptibility to penicillin G, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, erythromycin, and rifampicin. On the other hand, both strains showed high-level resistance to ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, and metronidazole (MIC values > 256.0 μg/mL), and also presented a MIC value for tetracycline (4.0 μg/mL) higher than the MIC breakpoint defined by EFSA (2008) for this antibiotic ( Table 2 ). Resistance to streptomycin, co-trimoxazole (the MICs for these two antibiotics were not determined in this study) and metronidazole were also detected for both strains with the disc diffusion method. In relation to gentamicin, although the two strains showed resistance in the disc diffusion method (inhibition zone < 12 mm), and the MIC values were 16.0 and 32.0 μg/mL for E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925, respectively, not exceeding the MIC breakpoint established for Enterococcus spp. ( EFSA 2008 ). Both strains presented MIC values of 4.0 μg/mL for oxacillin and 8.0 μg/mL for levofloxacin. The resistance of E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 to co-trimoxazole and metronidazole could be an acquired feature considering the resistance to antibiotics commonly reported for Enterococcus spp. in the literature, and it deserves further investigation. Favaro reported that four E. faecium strains isolated from feta cheese (from Bulgaria) were susceptible to ampicillin and penicillin and 2 of them were susceptible to vancomycin, which are the most clinically relevant antibiotics for curing infections involving multiple antibiotic-resistant enterococcus strains. In a study of Schirru , the majority of the tested antibiotics inhibited the growth of four E. faecium strains isolated from goat’s milk to some extent (from Sardenia, Italy). In the same study, five of the tested antibiotics (cotrimazin, cotrimixazol, nalidixic acid, oxacillin and sulphonamid) had no inhibitory effect on the studied E. faecium strains. In addition, variable results have been reported for interactions between E. faecium strains and cefalotin, cefpime, ceftiofur oflaxacin, tazobactam, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid and ampicillin + sulbactam ( Schirru ).
Table 2

Antimicrobial susceptibility.

Antibiotic MIC breakpoint recommendation of EUCAST (2011) and EFSA (2008) for Enterococcus spp. Enterococcus faecium EM485 Enterococcus faecium EM925 Sensitivity or resistance

EUCASTEFSA
AmoxicillinS ≤ 4 μg/mL, R ≥ 8 μg/mLNS0.12 μg/mL0.06 μg/mLS
Amoxicillin/clavulonic acidS ≤ 4 μg/mL, R ≥ 8 μg/mLNS0.12 μg/mL0.25 μg/mLS
AmpicillinS ≤ 4 μg/mL, R ≥ 8 μg/mL40.5 μg/mL0.12 μg/mLS
CefotaximeNSNS0.25 μg/mL0.25 μg/mLS
CeftriaxoneNSNS0.12 μg/mL0.06 μg/mLS
CiprofloxacinNSNS--R
Erythromycin40.25 μg/mL0.5 μg/mLS
Gentamicin> 128 μg/mL R > 32 μg/mL * 16.0 μg/mL32.0 μg/mLS
ImipenemS ≤ 4 μg/mL, R ≥ 8 μg/mLNS0.015 μg/mL0.015 μg/mLS
LevofloxacinNSNS8.0 μg/mL8.0 μg/mLS
LinezolidNSNS1.0 μg/mL1.0 μg/mLS
MeropenemNSNS0.015 μg/mL0.015 μg/mLS
MetronidazoleNSNS--R
OxacillinNSNS4.0 μg/mL4.0 μg/mLS
PenicillinNSNS1.0 μg/mL1.0 μg/mLS
TetracyclineNSR > 2 μg/mL4.0 μg/mL4.0 μg/mLR
VancomycinS ≤ 4 μg/mL, R > 4 μg/mLR > 4 μg/mL--R

− = growth of tested Enterococcus faecium strain was not effected by antibiotic;

with potential interference form the medium; NS = not specified by cited documents; R = resistant; S = sensitive.

Antimicrobial susceptibility. − = growth of tested Enterococcus faecium strain was not effected by antibiotic; with potential interference form the medium; NS = not specified by cited documents; R = resistant; S = sensitive. Antibiotic resistance is a fundamental issue in the safety evaluation of Enterococcus spp. for use in food products. Acquired resistance located in plasmids and transposons is the main concern ( Giraffa, 2002 ; Franz ). Moreover, intrinsic resistance to some antibiotics is a feature commonly found among Enterococcus strains isolated from foods, as reported by Franz . Antibiotic resistance in genus Enterococcus is controversial. Enterococci have a long history of application in food production ( Schillinger ) due to their favorable metabolic activities (lipolysis, esterolysis, citrate utilization, etc.) that contribute to the typical taste and flavor of fermented foods ( Centeno ; Giraffa and Carminati, 1997 ; Manolopoulou ). However, some Enterococcus strains are pathogens for humans and other animals, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. are frequently resistant to many antibiotics commonly used in veterinary and human medicine ( Landman and Quale, 1997 ). In the application of enterococci in foods, we need to pay special attention because of the possible spread of genetic determinants of resistance from these bacteria, which are generally located in conjugative plasmids or transposons prone to genetic exchange ( Hasman ; Zanella ). Multi-resistance has been more commonly reported for E. faecalis due to its notorious ability to acquire and transfer antibiotic-resistance genes ( Çitak ; McBride ). Moreover, Gomes reported that the prevalence of antibiotic resistance was higher for E. faecalis compared to E. faecium isolates. The results presented in the literature indicate that foods cannot be ruled out as a potential source for spreading antibiotic-resistant strains. ( Abriouel ). Tomé reported resistance to chloramphenicol by a strain of E. faecium isolated from cold-smoked salmon evaluated for its potential application as biopreservative. However, it is important to consider that starter cultures and potential probiotic LAB may be a potential reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes and that horizontal gene transfer to the other bacteria present in the human GIT is a possible scenario ( Dicks ; Teuber, 1999 ; Salyers ).

Genes for virulence, biogenic amines and antibiotic resistance

Verification of virulence factors in Enterococcus spp. by bio-molecular and bio-chemical approaches is important due to the risk of genetic transfer because these genes are usually located in conjugative plasmids ( Eaton and Gasson, 2001 ). In tests of the genes adhesion of collagen protein, aggregation substance, cytolysin, endocarditis antigen, enterococcal surface protein, gelatinase, hyaluronidase, histidine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, tyrosine decarboxylase, vancomycin A and vancomycin B, the only positive results were generated by PCR targeting the tyrosine decarboxylase and vancomycin B genes in E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 ( Table 1 ). In general, the observed frequency of positive results for the virulence factors studied was lower than that reported in other studies on Enterococcus isolated from foods ( Gomes ; Barbosa ) and lower when compared to studies with clinical isolates ( Eaton and Gasson, 2001 ; Franz ; Barbosa ). The investigation of virulence factors in Enterococci strains with potential application in food preservation is of foremost importance because such strains may contain several determinants of pathogenicity. Virulence factors may act as colonization factors by promoting the adhesion of bacteria to host cells, or as invasion factors that promote the invasion of epithelial cells, which disrupts the immune system ( de Souza, 2003 ). Several cell wall surface proteins play roles in enterococcal pathogenicity, including aggregation substance, enterococcal surface protein, and collagen-binding components ( Hendrickx ). Some extracellular proteins, such as hyaluronidase, may interact with lymphocyte receptors and be responsible for the induction of auto-immune diseases ( de Souza, 2003 ). Cytolysin is an exotoxin with bifunctional function as a bacteriocin and by presenting hemolytic effects ( Haas ). Expression of the aggregation substance protein facilitates close contact between cells, conjugation and possible transfer of virulence plasmids ( Hendrickx ). The aggregation substance protein may have a role in the translocation of enterococci into epithelial cells ( Franz and Holzapfel, 2004 ). Enterococcus surface protein is a cell wall-anchored protein with a special role in biofilm formation ( Hendrickx ). ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme) proteins facilitate the binding of Enterococcus spp. to collagen and are involved in pathogenicity in human infections ( Franz and Holzapfel, 2004 ). Gelatinase production is usually associated with enterococci from clinical samples, but it has also been detected in enterococci isolated from dairy and meat products ( Archimbaud ). The role of hyaluronidase in infections has been reviewed by Girish and Kemparaju (2007) . Hyaluronidase facilitates the spread of bacteria and toxins throughout host tissue by causing tissue damage ( Kayaoglu and Orstavik, 2004 ). In enterococci, six vancomycin resistance types have been phenotypically and genotypically identified, and two of them, VanA and VanB, may be located in transferable plasmids ( Courvalin, 2006 ). Several mechanisms are involved in the adhesion of microorganisms to intestinal epithelial cells. The hydrophobic nature of the outermost surface of microorganisms is involved in the attachment of bacteria to host tissue. The determination of microbial adhesion to hexadecane as a way to estimate the ability of a strain to adhere to epithelial cells is a valid qualitative phenomenological approach ( Kiely and Olson, 2000 ). Both strains presented low levels of hydrophobicity (8.18% for E. faecium EM485 and 11.33% for E. faecium EM925) determined as adhesion to n-hexadecane. Cell surface hydrophobicity is a non-specific interaction between microbial cells and their host. The initial interaction may be weak, is often reversible and it precedes subsequent adhesion processes mediated by more specific mechanisms involving cell-surface proteins and lipoteichoic acids ( Granato ; Rojas ; Ross and Jonsson, 2002 ). Bacterial cells with high hydrophobicity usually present strong interactions with mucosal cells. The same range of hydrophobicity has been reported for E. faecium isolated from feta cheese (from Bulgaria), presenting levels of hydrophobicity between 7.92% and 10.23% ( Favaro ). In another study ( Todorov ), hydrophobicity values between 12.6% and 14.7% were recorded for E. faecium ET05, ET12 and ET88. These values are lower than that recorded for L. rhamnosus GG (53.3%, Todorov ). Hydrophobicity may assist in adhesion, but it is not a prerequisite for strong adherence. Hydrophobicity varies among genetically closely related species and even among strains of the same species ( Schar-Zammaretti and Ubbink, 2003 ).

Growth in milk and viability in milk acidified with lactic acid

E. faecium EM485 and EM925 both grew in milk and were able to change milk’s pH after 6, 24 and 48 h of incubation. No decrease in cell counts was observed when E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 were maintained in milk acidified to pH 4.0 or to pH 5.0 at 5 °C for 30 days ( Table 3 ). These technological characteristics are interesting for posterior use in acidic products such as yogurts and acidified milk. The acidifying activity of E. faecium isolated from goat’s milk (from Sardenia, Italy) reported by Schirru was generally low. A good acid-producing starter culture needs to reduce the pH of milk from its normal value of approximately 6.6 to 5.3 in 6 h using an inoculum of 10%, and in general, enterococci exhibit low milk acidifying ability ( Schirru ).
Table 3

Growth in milk and viability in milk acidified with lactic acid.

MicroorganismMilk’s pH after Viability a (Δ log cfu/mL) in acidified milk at


6 h24 h48 hpH 4.0pH 5.0
E. faecium EM485 5.85.24.8 0.6 a 0.95 b
E. faecium EM925 5.34.84.80 0.47 b

Difference between counts at time 0 and after 30 days of cold storage (5 °C) in milk acidified at different pH values.

Increase of viable cell counts.

Growth in milk and viability in milk acidified with lactic acid. Difference between counts at time 0 and after 30 days of cold storage (5 °C) in milk acidified at different pH values. Increase of viable cell counts. When E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 was exposed to simulated gastric and small intestine conditions, good survival rates were recorded for both strains ( Figure 1 ). Such results are not surprising because Enterococcus spp. have a good chance of surviving acidic and bilious conditions ( Todorov ). A cell count reduction of 3.98 log cfu/mL was recorded for E. faecium EM485 after exposure to simulated gastric and small intestine conditions. Similar results were recorded for E. faecium EM925, with a reduction in cell number of 3.03 log cfu/mL ( Figure 1 ).
Figure 1

Effect of simulated gastric and intestinal conditions on the viability of selected strains. T0 = After 72 h in MRS broth; T1 = After 1 h in gastric model conditions; T3 = after 3 h in small intestine model conditions.

Effect of simulated gastric and intestinal conditions on the viability of selected strains. T0 = After 72 h in MRS broth; T1 = After 1 h in gastric model conditions; T3 = after 3 h in small intestine model conditions. Probiotics must survive in the acidic gastric environment if they are to reach the small intestine and colonize the host, thereby imparting their benefits. Enterococcus species are considered intrinsically resistant to acid ( Tannock, 2004 ). Although there are differences between species and strains, organisms generally exhibit increased sensitivity at pH values below 3.0 ( Ronka ). Hence, acid tolerance is accepted as one of the desirable properties used to select potentially probiotic strains. Gastric transit studies of probiotics have been conducted using both simulated gastric juice and animal and human gastric juices ( Charteris ; Gardiner ). Both of these approaches have limitations; the former fails to capture the influence of dietary and nonacidic constituents of gastric secretions on probiotic survival, and the latter is restricted by the availability of fresh material ( Charteris ). In addition, the exploitation of rich media, such as acidified MRS medium, may offer protection to bacteria by providing energy and metabolic precursors. The use of food ingredients to enhance probiotic survival through the GIT has been extensively studied ( Charteris ; Gardiner ). However, little data are available describing the effects of individual food components and the underlying mechanisms of action whereby they enhance the survival of LAB ( Charalampopoulus ).

Production of β-galactosidase

The ability of microorganisms to ferment lactose in milk is an important technological property of LAB with potential applications in the dairy industry. Hydrolysis of lactose, which confers taste, texture and nutritional value to milk and milk derivatives is carried out by the enzymes β-D-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23) and/or phospho-β-D-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.85), and it has been described in various organisms such as bacteria, yeasts and molds ( Zárate and Chaia, 2012 ). In addition to their technological importance, both the pure enzymes and the viable microorganisms that contain them have been used to alleviate intestinal disorders such as lactose intolerance. This condition occurs worldwide among the adult population and has been treated successfully by the incorporation of microorganisms, mainly lactobacilli and/or bifidobacteria, into dairy products as a source of β-galactosidase for the intra-intestinal hydrolysis of lactose and the modulation of colonic microbiota ( Zárate and Chaia, 2012 ). In this sense, β-galactosidase activity is a beneficial characteristic for probiotics or LAB with application in the dairy industry. The production of β-galactosidase by E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 was confirmed by employing sterile filter paper disks impregnated with o -nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranose (ONPG Disks, Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland). In previous studies, β-galactosidase production has been reported in different strains of Enterococcus spp. ( Todorov ; Favaro ).

Deconjugation of bile salts

In our study we found that E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 were similar in their ability to deconjugate bile salts. Both strains grow on MRS agar plates containing 0.5% (w/v) sodium salts of taurocholic acid (TC), taurodeoxycholic acid (TDC), glycocholic acid (GC), or glycodeoxycholic acid (GDC). However, deconjugation was recorded only for TDC and GDC. The major route of cholesterol excretion from humans and other mammals is through feces. Cholesterol is the precursor of primary bile salts that are formed in the liver and are stored as conjugated bile salts in the gall bladder for secretion in the gastrointestinal tract ( Corzo and Gilliland, 1999 ). A small fraction of bile salts that is not absorbed is lost as free bile salts in feces. Free bile salts are less soluble than conjugated bile salts, resulting in lower absorption in the intestinal lumen ( Center, 1993 ). At the physiological pH of the intestinal lumen, deconjugated bile salts can be transported through the epithelium ( Wong ) and into the blood stream of the host, or they can precipitate. Thus, in a steady-state situation, deconjugation of bile acids can reduce serum cholesterol levels by increasing the formation of new bile acids that are needed to replace those that have escaped the enterohepatic circulation ( Reynier ). Experiments with germ-free rats have shown that bile salt deconjugation by B. longum increases bile salt excretion ( Chikai ). The reduction in protein concentration in extracellular enzymatic extract by E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 grown in milk for 24 h in comparison with the control ( Figure 2 ) shows that the two strains display proteolytic activity. However, this enzymatic activity was very low when compared to that reported by Donkor for Lb. casei L26, which presented OD 340 nm above 1.80 after 24 h of fermentation in MRS at 42 °C. Church observed OD 340 nm above of 0.40 after Streptococcus ( St. ) lactis C2 fermentation in milk for 24 h at 22 °C.
Figure 2

Proteolytic activity (A) Extracellular proteolytic activity measured from two Enterococcus faecium strains compared with that of unfermented milk (milk blank). The strains were grown in milk for 24 h at 37 °C and the samples were assayed using the o -phthaldialdehyde method in a spectrophotometer at 340 nm. The data are reported as the mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). Different letters show significant difference (p < 0.05, t -test). (B) Protein concentration in extracellular enzymatic extract of two Enterococcus faecium strains compared with that of unfermented milk (milk blank). The strains were grown in milk for 24 h at 37 °C. The data are reported as the mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). Different letters show significant difference (p < 0.05, t -test).

Proteolytic activity (A) Extracellular proteolytic activity measured from two Enterococcus faecium strains compared with that of unfermented milk (milk blank). The strains were grown in milk for 24 h at 37 °C and the samples were assayed using the o -phthaldialdehyde method in a spectrophotometer at 340 nm. The data are reported as the mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). Different letters show significant difference (p < 0.05, t -test). (B) Protein concentration in extracellular enzymatic extract of two Enterococcus faecium strains compared with that of unfermented milk (milk blank). The strains were grown in milk for 24 h at 37 °C. The data are reported as the mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). Different letters show significant difference (p < 0.05, t -test). The specific proteolytic activity of E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925, calculated from the proteolytic activity and protein concentration values, were 18.73 ± 3.90 U/mg protein and 24.55 ± 2.57 U/mg protein, respectively, without a significance difference between them (p > 0.05, t -test). As shown in Figure 2 , the enzymatic activity of both strains is located in the extracellular extract. This finding is consistent with Arizcum reporting that the enzymatic activity of Enterococcus spp. was located mainly in the extracellular extract fraction. The importance of the protease activity is that it is related to the good growth of LAB in milk and to casein hydrolysis during cheese ripening. A study of Schirru reported low proteolytic activity in 2 of 4 tested E. faecium strains isolated from goat’s milk (from Sardenia, Italy). However, even though lower values have been reported for other Enterococcus spp. strains ( Pepe ), the result was similar to those produced by several LAB strains described in Madrau as promising autochthonous starter cultures for the production of Pecorino sardo cheese.

Aggregation

Auto-aggregation proved to be strain-specific and may vary inside the same taxonomic group. The value recorded for E. faecium EM485 was 80 ± 2% and for E. faecium EM925 it was 78 ± 3% ( Figure 3 ). Favaro reported much lower levels of auto-aggregation for E. faecium isolated from feta cheese (from Bulgaria) ranging from 8 ± 1 to 10 ± 2. In another study conducted by Todorov , strain-specificity in auto-aggregation was also observed for L. pentosus ST712BZ and L. paracasei ST284BZ. High levels of co-aggregation were observed between E. faecium EM485 and both Escherichia coli INCQS 00033 (78 ± 2%) and C. perfringens INCQS 00130 (81 ± 2%) and also between E. faecium EM925 and both Escherichia coli INCQS 00033 (74 ± 4%) and C. perfringens INCQS 00130 (84 ± 3%) ( Figure 3 ). Different degrees of co-aggregation have been measured with L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119, L. innocua ATCC 33090, L. monocytogens ATCC 7644 and E. faecium strains as reported by Favaro . High auto-aggregation would facilitate the exclusion of these pathogenic species from the GIT. Low levels of co-aggregation with pathogens may play an important role in preventing the formation of biofilms, in this way eliminating the pathogen from the GIT. On the other hand, higher co-aggregation levels with pathogens will facilitate antibacterial action by E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 and facilitate pathogen exclusion from the human GIT.
Figure 3

Aggregation properties (auto-aggregation and co-aggregation) for E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 with Escherichia coli INCQS 00033 and C . perfringens INCQS 00130.

Aggregation properties (auto-aggregation and co-aggregation) for E. faecium EM485 and E. faecium EM925 with Escherichia coli INCQS 00033 and C . perfringens INCQS 00130.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting on the properties of E. faecium strains isolated from artisanal Coalho cheeses from Brazil that addresses their technological potential, beneficial properties, and safety with respect to the presence of genes encoding virulence factors, biogenic amines and antibiotic resistance. Considering the results, E. faecium strains EM485 and EM925 are safe regarding the presence of genes associated with virulence factors and biogenic amine production, and they present technological properties compatible with use in a mixed starter culture for dairy products. However, the resistance to antimicrobials that was detected deserves further investigation.
  58 in total

Review 1.  Enterococci from foods.

Authors:  Giorgio Giraffa
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  Pathogenicity mechanisms of prokaryotic cells: an evolutionary view.

Authors:  Cristina Paiva de Souza
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.949

Review 3.  Functionality of enterococci in dairy products.

Authors:  Giorgio Giraffa
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Can the gut microflora of infants be modified by giving probiotics to mothers?

Authors:  G W Tannock
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.839

5.  Probiotic and milk technological properties of Lactobacillus brevis.

Authors:  Elina Rönkä; Erja Malinen; Maria Saarela; Merja Rinta-Koski; Johannes Aarnikunnas; Airi Palva
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-05-25       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 6.  Enterococci in foods--a conundrum for food safety.

Authors:  Charles M A P Franz; Michael E Stiles; Karl Heinz Schleifer; Wilhelm H Holzapfel
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Effect of proteolytic starter cultures as leavening agents of pizza dough.

Authors:  O Pepe; F Villani; D Oliviero; T Greco; S Coppola
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 5.277

8.  Evolution of microbial populations during traditional Feta cheese manufacture and ripening.

Authors:  Eugenia Manolopoulou; Panagiotis Sarantinopoulos; Evagelia Zoidou; Anastasios Aktypis; Ekaterini Moschopoulou; Ioannis G Kandarakis; Emmanuel M Anifantakis
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Evaluation of the effect of malt, wheat and barley extracts on the viability of potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria under acidic conditions.

Authors:  D Charalampopoulos; S S Pandiella; C Webb
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  The cell wall of lactic acid bacteria: surface constituents and macromolecular conformations.

Authors:  Prisca Schär-Zammaretti; Job Ubbink
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  11 in total

1.  Assessment of some metabolic activities and potential probiotic properties of eight Enterococcus bacteria isolated from white cheese microbiota.

Authors:  Rasta Hajikhani; Derya Onal Darilmaz; Zehra Nur Yuksekdag; Yavuz Beyatli
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  Influence of a Co-culture of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus casei on the Proteolysis and ACE-Inhibitory Activity of a Beverage Based on Reconstituted Goat Whey Powder.

Authors:  Áurea Marcela de Souza Pereira; Daniely Rayane Bezerra de Farias; Blenda Brito de Queiroz; Michelangela Suelleny de Caldas Nobre; Mônica Tejo Cavalcanti; Hévila Oliveira Salles; Karina Maria Olbrich Dos Santos; Ana Claudia Dantas de Medeiros; Eliane Rolim Florentino; Flávia Carolina Alonso Buriti
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Safety profiles of beneficial lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy systems.

Authors:  Monique Colombo; Luis Augusto Nero; Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  Beneficial and Safety Properties of a Corynebacterium vitaeruminis Strain Isolated from the Cow Rumen.

Authors:  M Colombo; N P A Castilho; S D Todorov; L A Nero
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Evaluation of Probiotic Properties and Safety of Enterococcus faecium Isolated From Artisanal Tunisian Meat "Dried Ossban".

Authors:  Mohamed Zommiti; Mélyssa Cambronel; Olivier Maillot; Magalie Barreau; Khaled Sebei; Marc Feuilloley; Mounir Ferchichi; Nathalie Connil
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Lactic Acid Bacteria as Biological Control of Staphylococcus aureus in Coalho Goat Cheese.

Authors:  Rânmilla Cristhina Santos Castro; Anay Priscilla David de Oliveira; Eline Almeida Rodrigues de Souza; Tayla Marielle Antunes Correia; Jane Viana de Souza; Francesca Silva Dias
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  Effects of Quercetin and Resveratrol on in vitro Properties Related to the Functionality of Potentially Probiotic Lactobacillus Strains.

Authors:  Aldeir Sabino Dos Santos; Thatyane Mariano Rodrigues de Albuquerque; José Luiz de Brito Alves; Evandro Leite de Souza
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  In vitro assessment of metabolic profile of Enterococcus strains of human origin.

Authors:  Ashlesha Bhagwat; Uday S Annapure
Journal:  J Genet Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-25

Review 9.  Multi-Strain Probiotics: Synergy among Isolates Enhances Biological Activities.

Authors:  Iliya D Kwoji; Olayinka A Aiyegoro; Moses Okpeku; Matthew A Adeleke
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-13

10.  Comparative genome analysis reveals key genetic factors associated with probiotic property in Enterococcus faecium strains.

Authors:  Vikas C Ghattargi; Meghana A Gaikwad; Bharati S Meti; Yogesh S Nimonkar; Kunal Dixit; Om Prakash; Yogesh S Shouche; Shrikant P Pawar; Dhiraj P Dhotre
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.