Jack L Ferracane1, Thomas J Hilton2. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA. Electronic address: ferracan@ohsu.edu. 2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA. Electronic address: hiltont@ohsu.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this article is to discuss the evidence for polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress of dental composite restoratives in terms of its potential relevance to the clinical situation METHODS: Articles relating to the issue of polymerization contraction stress generation in dental composite materials, and the factors that influence it, were reviewed and included. Particular attention was paid to evidence derived from clinical studies. Articles were identified through PubMed and through the bibliographies of other articles. RESULTS: There is extensive evidence for the presence of polymerization contraction stress in dental composites, as well as evidence for its deleterious effects, which include marginal leakage, gap formation, cuspal deflection, tooth cracking, reduced bond strength and lowered mechanical properties of the restorative. There is little, if any, direct evidence for the clinical effect of these contraction stresses. No study has directly established a link between these stresses and enhanced postoperative sensitivity or recurrent caries, for example. However, the concern over these stresses and the manner in which they influence the placement of current composite materials demonstrates that they are considered to be very important. CONCLUSION: Though no direct evidence exists to prove that the generation of contraction stress in dental composite restorations causes reduced clinical longevity, the indirect evidence from numerous in vitro studies and the concern over controlling their effects proves that they are clinically relevant.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this article is to discuss the evidence for polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress of dental composite restoratives in terms of its potential relevance to the clinical situation METHODS: Articles relating to the issue of polymerization contraction stress generation in dental composite materials, and the factors that influence it, were reviewed and included. Particular attention was paid to evidence derived from clinical studies. Articles were identified through PubMed and through the bibliographies of other articles. RESULTS: There is extensive evidence for the presence of polymerization contraction stress in dental composites, as well as evidence for its deleterious effects, which include marginal leakage, gap formation, cuspal deflection, tooth cracking, reduced bond strength and lowered mechanical properties of the restorative. There is little, if any, direct evidence for the clinical effect of these contraction stresses. No study has directly established a link between these stresses and enhanced postoperative sensitivity or recurrent caries, for example. However, the concern over these stresses and the manner in which they influence the placement of current composite materials demonstrates that they are considered to be very important. CONCLUSION: Though no direct evidence exists to prove that the generation of contraction stress in dental composite restorations causes reduced clinical longevity, the indirect evidence from numerous in vitro studies and the concern over controlling their effects proves that they are clinically relevant.
Authors: Marwa Abdelaziz; Andrés F Zuluaga; Francesco Betancourt; Daniel Fried; Ivo Krejci; Tissiana Bortolotto Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2020-02-19
Authors: Vilhelm G Ólafsson; André V Ritter; Edward J Swift; Lee W Boushell; Ching-Chang Ko; Gabrielle R Jackson; Sumitha N Ahmed; Terence E Donovan Journal: J Esthet Restor Dent Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 2.843
Authors: André L Faria-E-Silva; Andressa Dos Santos; Angela Tang; Emerson M Girotto; Carmem S Pfeifer Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 5.304