Girish S Munavalli1, Ratchathorn Panchaprateep. 1. *Dermatology, Laser, and Vein Specialists of the Carolinas, Charlotte, North Carolina; †Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina; ‡Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; §Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pseudogynecomastia refers to benign male breast enlargement due to excess subareolar fat. Standard treatment is surgical excision under general anesthesia, liposuction, or a combination of both. OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis was investigated for nonsurgical treatment of pseudogynecomastia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Enrollment consisted of 21 males with pseudogynecomastia. Subjects received a first treatment consisting of a 60-minute cryolipolysis cycle, followed by a two-minute massage, and a second 60-minute cycle with 50% treatment area overlap. At 60 days of follow-up, subjects received a second 60-minute treatment. Safety was evaluated by monitoring side effects and adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by ultrasound, clinical photographs, and subject surveys. RESULTS: Surveys revealed that 95% of subjects reported improved visual appearance and 89% reported reduced embarrassment associated with pseudogynecomastia. Ultrasound showed mean fat layer reduction of 1.6 ± 1.2 mm. Blinded reviewers correctly identified 82% of baseline photographs. Side effects included mild discomfort during treatment and transient paresthesia and tenderness. One case of paradoxical hyperplasia (PH) occurred but likelihood of PH in the male breast is not believed to be greater than in any other treatment area. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated feasibility of cryolipolysis for safe, effective, and well-tolerated nonsurgical treatment of pseudogynecomastia.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Pseudogynecomastia refers to benign male breast enlargement due to excess subareolar fat. Standard treatment is surgical excision under general anesthesia, liposuction, or a combination of both. OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis was investigated for nonsurgical treatment of pseudogynecomastia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Enrollment consisted of 21 males with pseudogynecomastia. Subjects received a first treatment consisting of a 60-minute cryolipolysis cycle, followed by a two-minute massage, and a second 60-minute cycle with 50% treatment area overlap. At 60 days of follow-up, subjects received a second 60-minute treatment. Safety was evaluated by monitoring side effects and adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by ultrasound, clinical photographs, and subject surveys. RESULTS: Surveys revealed that 95% of subjects reported improved visual appearance and 89% reported reduced embarrassment associated with pseudogynecomastia. Ultrasound showed mean fat layer reduction of 1.6 ± 1.2 mm. Blinded reviewers correctly identified 82% of baseline photographs. Side effects included mild discomfort during treatment and transient paresthesia and tenderness. One case of paradoxical hyperplasia (PH) occurred but likelihood of PH in the male breast is not believed to be greater than in any other treatment area. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated feasibility of cryolipolysis for safe, effective, and well-tolerated nonsurgical treatment of pseudogynecomastia.
Authors: Suzanne L Kilmer; Sue Ellen Cox; Brian D Zelickson; Eric P Bachelor; Sylvia Gamio; Rafael Ostrowski; Linda D Pham; W Grant Stevens Journal: Dermatol Surg Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.914