Literature DB >> 26217714

Biochemical and computational analyses of two phenotypically related GALT mutations (S222N and S135L) that lead to atypical galactosemia.

Benjamin Cocanougher1, Umut Aypar2, Amber McDonald2, Linda Hasadsri2, Michael J Bennett3, W Edward Highsmith2, Kristin D׳Aco1.   

Abstract

Galactosemia is a metabolic disorder caused by mutations in the GALT gene [1,2]. We encountered a patient heterozygous for a known pathogenic H132Q mutation and a novel S222N variant of unknown significance [3]. Reminiscent of patients with the S135L mutation, our patient had loss of GALT enzyme activity in erythrocytes but a very mild clinical phenotype [3-8]. We performed splicing experiments and computational structural analyses to investigate the role of the novel S222N variant. Alamut software data predicted loss of splicing enhancers for the S222N and S135L mutations [9,10]. A cDNA library was generated from our patient׳s RNA to investigate for splicing errors, but no change in transcript length was seen [3]. In silico structural analysis was performed to investigate enzyme stability and attempt to understand the mechanism of the atypical galactosemia phenotype. Stability results are publicly available in the GALT Protein Database 2.0 [11-14]. Animations were created to give the reader a dynamic view of the enzyme structure and mutation locations. Protein database files and python scripts are included for further investigation.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26217714      PMCID: PMC4509990          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of the data Heterozygosity for novel S222N GALT mutation leads to atypical galactosemia similar to known S135L cases. • Splicing enhancers are predicted to be lost for both S222N and S135L mutations. In silico analyses predict stability/instability of dimers present in our patient and allow for visualization of mutation types.

Data, experimental design, materials and methods

Case report

Our data is based on a single case of atypical galactosemia caused by compound heterozygosity for a known pathogenic H132Q mutation and a novel S222N variant of unknown significance [3]. Briefly, our patient had a positive newborn screen for galactosemia with subsequent biochemical confirmation of absent GALT enzyme activity, was treated with a galactose-restricted diet until the age of 3 with no symptoms, and was later lost to follow-up. The patient presented to our clinic at age 17 with no stigmata of galactosemia (apart from mild anxiety) to determine his disease status [15]. Testing revealed nearly complete absence of GALT enzyme activity in erythrocytes without any increase in the clinical biomarkers of galactosemia, galactose-1-phosphate and galactitol [16,17]. Sequencing revealed compound heterozygosity for H132Q and S222N mutations. Given the ability of our patient to oxidize galactose in tissues other than red blood cells, as evidenced by galactose-1-phosphate and galactitol levels in the normal range, we suspected a splicing defect. Differential splicing seemed a reasonable explanation for differential tissue activity of the GALT enzyme.

Splicing experiments

We first examined the S222N mutation for changes in splice sites due to genomic c.665G>A. Fig. 1 is a screenshot of the Alamut software program showing that this mutation does not create or destroy a predicted splice site [9,10].
Fig. 1

Screenshot from the Alamut (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories) Splicing Effects window around the GALT c665G>A variant [9,10]. The top box represents the wild type sequence, with a G at position c.665, and the bottom panel representing the mutant sequences, with an A at c.665. In both panels the nucleotides boxed in lavender represent the 3′ end of exon 7. The mutant sequence is not predicted to create or destroy a predicted splice site.

Though this mutation does not directly lead to changes in a splice site, further investigation revealed a predicted loss of a cluster of exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) sites due to the c.665G>A mutation (Fig. 2). This could potentially explain the loss of activity only in erythrocytes if these enhancers were specific to red blood cells and unused in other tissues. Interestingly, the c.404C>T mutation, which leads to the S135L protein, also results in a predicted loss of ESE clusters (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Screenshot from the Alamut (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories) Splicing Predictor/ESE Predictions window around the GALT c665G>A variant [9,10]. The top box represents the wild type sequence, with a G at position c.665, and the bottom panel representing the mutant sequences, with an A at c.665. In both panels the nucleotides boxed in lavender represent the 3′ end of exon 7. The mutant sequence is predicted to lose binding sites for SRp40 (green box), SRp55 (yellow box), and SF2/ASF (pink/red box).

Fig. 3

Screenshot from the Alamut (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories) Splicing Predictor/ESE Predictions window around the GALT c.404 C>T variant responsible for the S135L mutation [8,9]. The top box represents the wild type sequence, with a G at position c.665, and the bottom panel representing the mutant sequences, with an A at c.665. In both panels the nucleotides boxed in lavender represent the 3′ end of exon 7. The mutant sequence is predicted to lose binding sites for SF2/ASF (pink/red box).

In order to further investigate this hypothesis, RNA was isolated from the whole blood sample, a cDNA library was created, and PCR was used to amplify the entire gene in several overlapping pieces. No shift in cDNA size was seen, which would be expected in the case of interrupted or aberrant splicing (Supplementary Fig. 1) [3]. The cDNA was sequenced to look for splicing defects that may not be apparent on gel electrophoresis, but there were no changes in exon structure from the reference or the father׳s cDNA sequence (Supplementary Fig. 2) [3]. The only base pair change identified was the c.665G>A variant itself.

Structure analysis

Protein modeling was performed to evaluate the stability of the three types of dimers produced by our patient (H132Q homodimer, H132Q/S222N heterodimer, and S222N homodimer) and the phenotypically similar S135L homodimer (Supplementary Files 1–4). We submitted our mutation to the GALT protein database run by Dr. Anna Marabotti and the Laboratory of Bioinformatics at the Institute of Food Science. The models were mutated using the “mutate model” function in Modeller. Data on stability of each of the various GALT dimers are are accessible in the GALT Protein Database 2.0 [11,12]. Using the UCSF Chimera software, we investigated the residues involved in our four dimeric structures. As evidenced in the included animations, the mutations in the H132Q and S222N heterodimer are too far from one another in the structure to interact directly (Supplementary Movie 1) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Video stills of two movies generated to examine the structure of GALT enzyme variants. Supplementary Movie 1 examines the location and neighboring residues for the H132Q/S222N heterodimer. Supplementary Movie 2 examines the location of the S222N and S135L mutation residues.

A separate analysis was performed to visualize the S222N and S135L residue locations. The two are located on separate ends of the dimer, but both appear to be peripherally accessible for phosphorylation in the non-mutated state (Supplementary Movie 2). This animation was colored to match the original publication of the GALT enzyme structure [18]. Python scripts created to generate both of the animations above have been included (Supplementary Files 5,6). They can be opened and modified using the UCSF Chimera software [14].
Subject areaMedicine

More specific subject areaMedical genetics, galactosemia
Type of dataGraph, protein structure animation, pdb files, python scripts
How data was acquiredIn silico structural analyses performed with Chimera (UCSF) and modeller programs. Splicing studies performed with Alamut Splicing Predictor (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories). RNA studies performed on whole blood sample from patient.
Data formatAnalyzed molecular data, Analyzed computational data, and raw.pdb files for structural analysis
Experimental factorsComputational analyses were performed using Alamut software, Modeller, and UCSF Chimera.
Experimental featuresSplicing enhancer studies performed using Alamut software. Animations and structural analysis performed with Modeller and UCSF Chimera software.
Data source locationNot applicable
Data accessibilityStructural data available in GALT protein database (GALT Protein Database 2.0). Biochemical data available in article.
  13 in total

1.  UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.

Authors:  Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Identification of novel mutations in classical galactosemia.

Authors:  Annet M Bosch; Lodewijk Ijlst; Wendy Oostheim; Joyce Mulders; Henk D Bakker; Frits A Wijburg; Ronald J A Wanders; Hans R Waterham
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Homology modeling studies on human galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase and on its galactosemia-related mutant Q188R provide an explanation of molecular effects of the mutation on homo- and heterodimers.

Authors:  Anna Marabotti; Angelo M Facchiano
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  The molecular basis of transferase galactosaemia in South African negroids.

Authors:  N Manga; T Jenkins; H Jackson; D A Whittaker; A B Lane
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.982

5.  The adult galactosemic phenotype.

Authors:  Susan E Waisbren; Nancy L Potter; Catherine M Gordon; Robert C Green; Patricia Greenstein; Cynthia S Gubbels; Estela Rubio-Gozalbo; Donald Schomer; Corrine Welt; Vera Anastasoaie; Kali D'Anna; Jennifer Gentile; Chao-Yu Guo; Leah Hecht; Roberta Jackson; Bernadette M Jansma; Yijun Li; Va Lip; David T Miller; Michael Murray; Leslie Power; Nicolle Quinn; Frances Rohr; Yiping Shen; Amy Skinder-Meredith; Inge Timmers; Rachel Tunick; Ann Wessel; Bai-Lin Wu; Harvey Levy; Louis Elsas; Gerard T Berry
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Liver galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase: activity in normal and galactosemic subjects.

Authors:  S Segal; S Rogers; P G Holtzapple
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  GALT protein database: querying structural and functional features of GALT enzyme.

Authors:  Antonio d'Acierno; Angelo Facchiano; Anna Marabotti
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  A prevalent mutation for galactosemia among black Americans.

Authors:  K Lai; S D Langley; R H Singh; P P Dembure; L N Hjelm; L J Elsas
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Three-dimensional structure of galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase from Escherichia coli at 1.8 A resolution.

Authors:  J E Wedekind; P A Frey; I Rayment
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-09-05       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Endogenous synthesis of galactose in normal men and patients with hereditary galactosaemia.

Authors:  G T Berry; I Nissim; Z Lin; A T Mazur; J B Gibson; S Segal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Variants of uncertain significance in newborn screening disorders: implications for large-scale genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Alekhya Narravula; Kathryn B Garber; S Hussain Askree; Madhuri Hegde; Patricia L Hall
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 8.822

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.