Literature DB >> 27308838

Variants of uncertain significance in newborn screening disorders: implications for large-scale genomic sequencing.

Alekhya Narravula1, Kathryn B Garber1, S Hussain Askree1, Madhuri Hegde1, Patricia L Hall1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As exome and genome sequencing using high-throughput sequencing technologies move rapidly into the diagnostic process, laboratories and clinicians need to develop a strategy for dealing with uncertain findings. A commitment must be made to minimize these findings, and all parties may need to make adjustments to their processes. The information required to reclassify these variants is often available but not communicated to all relevant parties.
METHODS: To illustrate these issues, we focused on three well-characterized monogenic, metabolic disorders included in newborn screens: classic galactosemia, caused by GALT variants; phenylketonuria, caused by PAH variants; and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency, caused by ACADM variants. In 10 years of clinical molecular testing, we have observed 134 unique GALT variants, 46 of which were variants of uncertain significance (VUS). In PAH, we observed 132 variants, including 17 VUS, and for ACADM, we observed 64 unique variants, of which 33 were uncertain.
CONCLUSION: After this review, 17 VUS (37%; 7 in ACADM, 9 in GALT, and 1 in PAH) were reclassified from uncertain (6 to benign or likely benign and 11 to pathogenic or likely pathogenic). We identified common types of missing information that would have helped make a definitive classification and categorized this information by ease and cost to obtain.Genet Med 19 1, 77-82.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27308838     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  31 in total

1.  Free the data: one laboratory's approach to knowledge-based genomic variant classification and preparation for EMR integration of genomic data.

Authors:  Lora J H Bean; Stuart W Tinker; Cristina da Silva; Madhuri R Hegde
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  FORGE Canada Consortium: outcomes of a 2-year national rare-disease gene-discovery project.

Authors:  Chandree L Beaulieu; Jacek Majewski; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Mark E Samuels; Bridget A Fernandez; Francois P Bernier; Michael Brudno; Bartha Knoppers; Janet Marcadier; David Dyment; Shelin Adam; Dennis E Bulman; Steve J M Jones; Denise Avard; Minh Thu Nguyen; Francois Rousseau; Christian Marshall; Richard F Wintle; Yaoqing Shen; Stephen W Scherer; Jan M Friedman; Jacques L Michaud; Kym M Boycott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A frequent splicing mutation and novel missense mutations color the updated mutational spectrum of classic galactosemia in Portugal.

Authors:  Ana I Coelho; Ruben Ramos; Ana Gaspar; Cláudia Costa; Anabela Oliveira; Luísa Diogo; Paula Garcia; Sandra Paiva; Esmeralda Martins; Elisa Leão Teles; Esmeralda Rodrigues; M Teresa Cardoso; Elena Ferreira; Sílvia Sequeira; Margarida Leite; Maria João Silva; Isabel Tavares de Almeida; João B Vicente; Isabel Rivera
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Correlation assessment among clinical phenotypes, expression analysis and molecular modeling of 14 novel variations in the human galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase gene.

Authors:  Manshu Tang; Angelo Facchiano; Rakesh Rachamadugu; Fernanda Calderon; Rong Mao; Luciano Milanesi; Anna Marabotti; Kent Lai
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Analysis of galactosemia-linked mutations of GALT enzyme using a computational biology approach.

Authors:  A Facchiano; A Marabotti
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.650

6.  Functional studies of 18 heterologously expressed medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) variants.

Authors:  Kira-Lee Koster; Marga Sturm; Diran Herebian; Sander H J Smits; Ute Spiekerkoetter
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.982

7.  Lack of genotype-phenotype correlations and outcome in MCAD deficiency diagnosed by newborn screening in New York State.

Authors:  Georgianne L Arnold; Carlos A Saavedra-Matiz; Patricia A Galvin-Parton; Richard Erbe; Ellen Devincentis; David Kronn; Shideh Mofidi; Melissa Wasserstein; Joan E Pellegrino; Paul A Levy; Darius J Adams; Matthew Nichols; Michele Caggana
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 4.797

8.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Mirjam Plantinga; Erwin Birnie; Marian A Verkerk; Anneke M Lucassen; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M Van Langen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency associated with a novel splice mutation in the ACADM gene missed by newborn screening.

Authors:  Sarah C Grünert; A Wehrle; P Villavicencio-Lorini; E Lausch; B Vetter; K O Schwab; S Tucci; U Spiekerkoetter
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.103

View more
  11 in total

1.  Value of genetic analysis for confirming inborn errors of metabolism detected through the Spanish neonatal screening program.

Authors:  Rosa Navarrete; Fátima Leal; Ana I Vega; Ana Morais-López; María Teresa Garcia-Silva; Elena Martín-Hernández; Pilar Quijada-Fraile; Ana Bergua; Inmaculada Vives; Inmaculada García-Jiménez; Raquel Yahyaoui; Consuelo Pedrón-Giner; Amaya Belanger-Quintana; Sinziana Stanescu; Elvira Cañedo; Oscar García-Campos; María Bueno-Delgado; Carmen Delgado-Pecellín; Isidro Vitoria; María Dolores Rausell; Elena Balmaseda; Mari Luz Couce; Lourdes R Desviat; Begoña Merinero; Pilar Rodríguez-Pombo; Magdalena Ugarte; Celia Pérez-Cerdá; Belén Pérez
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Array comparative genomic hybridization and genomic sequencing in the diagnostics of the causes of congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Krzysztof Szczałuba; Urszula Demkow
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Reassessment of Genomic Sequence Variation to Harmonize Interpretation for Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Kathryn B Garber; Lisa M Vincent; John J Alexander; Lora J H Bean; Sherri Bale; Madhuri Hegde
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  What Genomic Sequencing Can Offer Universal Newborn Screening Programs.

Authors:  Cynthia M Powell
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Characterization of variants of uncertain significance in isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase identified through newborn screening: An approach for faster analysis.

Authors:  Olivia M D'Annibale; Erik A Koppes; Ahmad N Alodaib; Catherine Kochersperger; Anuradha Karunanidhi; Al-Walid Mohsen; Jerry Vockley
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.204

6.  Characterization of exonic variants of uncertain significance in very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase identified through newborn screening.

Authors:  Olivia M D'Annibale; Erik A Koppes; Meena Sethuraman; Kaitlyn Bloom; Al-Walid Mohsen; Jerry Vockley
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.750

7.  Genomic newborn screening: public health policy considerations and recommendations.

Authors:  Jan M Friedman; Martina C Cornel; Aaron J Goldenberg; Karla J Lister; Karine Sénécal; Danya F Vears
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  The low excretor phenotype of glutaric acidemia type I is a source of false negative newborn screening results and challenging diagnoses.

Authors:  Adam J Guenzel; Patricia L Hall; Anna I Scott; Christina Lam; Irene J Chang; Jenny Thies; Carlos R Ferreira; Pavel Pichurin; William Laxen; Kimiyo Raymond; Dimitar K Gavrilov; Devin Oglesbee; Piero Rinaldo; Dietrich Matern; Silvia Tortorelli
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2021-04-05

9.  Two novel mutations in DNAJC12 identified by whole-exome sequencing in a patient with mild hyperphenylalaninemia.

Authors:  Mengting Li; Qi Yang; Sheng Yi; Zailong Qin; Jingsi Luo; Xin Fan
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.183

10.  Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lilian Downie; Jane Halliday; Sharon Lewis; David J Amor
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.